Conditional Independence, the Mantel-Haenszel Test, and the Yates Correction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Barnard,et al. On alleged gains in power from lower P-values. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.
[2] W. G. Cochran. Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .
[3] F. Yates. Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the χ2 Test , 1934 .
[4] G. Upton. A Comparison of Alternative Tests for the 2 Times 2 Comparative Trial , 1982 .
[5] W. Haenszel,et al. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[6] J. V. Howard,et al. The $2\times2$ table: a discussion from a Bayesian viewpoint , 1998 .
[7] David E. Hapeman. Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data , 2000, Technometrics.
[8] Nathan Mantel,et al. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .
[9] M. G. Haviland. Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.
[10] G. Upton. Fisher's Exact Test , 1992 .
[11] M. W. Birch. The Detection of Partial Association, I: The 2 × 2 Case , 1964 .
[12] W. Conover. Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2×2 Contingency Tables , 1974 .
[13] P. Bickel,et al. Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data from Berkeley , 1975, Science.
[14] W. J. Conover,et al. Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: Rejoinder , 1974 .
[15] F. Yates,et al. Tests of Significance for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables , 1984 .
[16] E. S. Pearson,et al. The choice of statistical tests illustrated on the interpretation of data classed in a 2 X 2 table. , 1947, Biometrika.