Asynchronous classification of MFSK signals using the higher order correlation domain

The problem of asynchronous classification of M-ary frequency-shift keying (MFSK) signals when contaminated by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is addressed. Two approaches are adopted. The first is based on the classical likelihood-ratio theory, which provides performance that is optimal, but sensitive to unknown frequency offsets. The second completely eliminates the fixed-frequency structure and instead utilizes measurements made strictly in the higher order correlation (HOC) domain. Assessed are the sensitivity gaps in performance incurred by the synchronous rules when the unknown signal time of arrival or epoch offsets are introduced. This sensitivity is ameliorated by averaging over a reduced-uncertainty epoch model. Fairly satisfactory results are reported with a small number of the discretized epoch uncertainty levels.

[1]  Charles L. Weber,et al.  Detection Performance Considerations for Direct-Sequence and Time-Hopping LPI Waveforms , 1985, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[2]  L. Franks,et al.  Carrier and Bit Synchronization in Data Communication - A Tutorial Review , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  N. Krasner Optimal Detection of Digitally Modulated Signals , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[4]  Janet Aisbett Automatic modulation recognition using time domain parameters , 1987 .

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[6]  F. F. Liedtke,et al.  Computer simulation of an automatic classification procedure for digitally modulated communication signals with unknown parameters , 1984 .

[7]  Andreas Polydoros,et al.  Statistical models for evaluating the performance of noncoherent slow frequency-hopped M-FSK intercept receivers , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  J. E. Hipp Modulation Classification based on Statistical Moments , 1986, MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's.

[9]  C. Helstrom,et al.  Statistical theory of signal detection , 1968 .

[10]  Charles L. Weber,et al.  Higher-Order Correlation-Based Approach to Modulation Classification of Digitally Frequency-Modulated Signals , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[11]  R. F. Schneider,et al.  Modulation recognition of spread spectrum signals using modulation domain measurements , 1991, MILCOM 91 - Conference record.

[12]  Donald Jansky,et al.  Definition of a Measurement Capability for Spectrum Managers , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  Andreas Polydoros,et al.  Likelihood methods for MPSK modulation classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  S. S. Soliman,et al.  Automatic modulation recognition of digitally modulated signals , 1989, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 'Bridging the Gap. Interoperability, Survivability, Security'.