The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning

This study investigated second language metalinguistic knowledge, or explicit knowledge about the second language, in English-speaking university-level learners of German and Spanish. The status of metalinguistic knowledge in relation to the individual difference variables of language-learning aptitude, working memory for language, and participants' language-learning history was identified. Language-learning experience in formal settings was found to be the strongest predictor for levels of metalinguistic knowledge attained by the participants. Moreover, it was found that despite a significant relationship with language-learning aptitude, metalinguistic knowledge is separable and distinct from both aptitude and working memory. In conclusion, suggestions for further research are put forward.

[1]  R. Corston.  A Crash course in SPSS for Windows , 2000 .

[2]  John Hajek,et al.  Metalinguistic knowledge: How important is it in studying a language at university? , 1999 .

[3]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Phonological Short-term Memory and Foreign Language Learning , 1999 .

[4]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual Differences in Second-Language Proficiency , 2006, Psychology Science.

[5]  Leila Ranta.  8. The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom , 2002 .

[6]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT JUDGEMENTS OF L2 GRAMMATICALITY , 1979 .

[7]  David Birdsong.  Metalinguistic Performance and Interlinguistic Competence , 1989 .

[8]  Birgit Harley,et al.  LANGUAGE APTITUDE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY IN CLASSROOM LEARNERS OF DIFFERENT STARTING AGES , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. , 2001 .

[10]  K. Bailey.  The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics , 1991 .

[11]  Catherine Elder,et al.  The Relationship between Metalinguistic Knowledge and Learning Outcomes among Undergraduate Students of Chinese , 2004 .

[12]  R. Oxford,et al.  Cognition Plus: Correlates Of Language Learning Success , 1995 .

[13]  Karen Roehr,et al.  Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Ability in University-Level L2 Learners , 2008 .

[14]  Joseph Collentine.  Insights into the Construction of Grammatical Knowledge Provided by User-Behavior Tracking Technologies , 2000 .

[15]  Ulrike Jessner,et al.  Metalinguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: Cognitive Aspects of Third Language Learning. , 1999 .

[16]  J. Hulstijn.  THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT SECOND-LANGUAGE LEARNING: Introduction , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  R. Dekeyser.  Implicit and Explicit Learning , 2008 .

[18]  R. Ellis.  The Definition and Measurement of L2 Explicit Knowledge , 2004 .

[19]  P. Robinson.  APTITUDE AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[20]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory: The multiple-component model , 1999 .

[21]  N. Ellis,et al.  Working Memory in the Acquisition of Vocabulary and Syntax: Putting Language in Good Order , 1996 .

[22]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Chapter 18. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning , 2008 .

[24]  Barry McLaughlin,et al.  Aptitude from an information-processing perspective , 1995 .

[25]  Mark Sawyer,et al.  L2 Working Memory Capacity and L2 Reading Skill , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[26]  Ulrike Jessner,et al.  Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language , 2006 .

[27]  John Carroll,et al.  A crash course. , 2009, Biotechnology healthcare.

[28]  Ernesto Macaro,et al.  Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? , 2006 .

[29]  G. Hu.  PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE UTILITY OF METALINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE IN SECOND LANGUAGE PRODUCTION , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[30]  Julie F. Pallant,et al.  SPSS Survival Manual , 2020 .

[31]  Rosemary Erlam,et al.  Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition , 2005 .

[32]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[33]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[34]  Karlheinz Hecht,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Grammar:An Empirical Study , 1992 .

[35]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The Prediction of Success in Intensive Foreign Language Training. , 1964 .

[36]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Use in Acquisition-poor Environments* , 1985 .

[37]  Paul J. Angelis.  SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY, FOREIGN LANGUAGE APTITUDE, AND INTELLIGENCE: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSES. Miyuki Sasaki. New York: Peter Lang, 1996. Pp. xii + 155. $40.95 cloth. , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of second language acquisition , 1999 .

[39]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Toward a Definition of Metalinguistic Skill. , 1985 .

[40]  R. Dekeyser.  WHAT MAKES LEARNING SECOND-LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DIFFICULT? AREVIEW OF ISSUES , 2005 .

[41]  Leila Ranta,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design , 2001 .

[42]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Analysis and Control in the Development of Second Language Proficiency , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[43]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Modern language aptitude test. , 1959 .

[44]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[45]  C. Clapham,et al.  Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency , 1997 .

[46]  Karen Roehr,et al.  Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning , 2008 .

[47]  Janet M. Renou.  Learner Accuracy and Learner Performance: The Quest for a Link , 2000 .

[48]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[49]  P. Skehan.  Individual Differences in Second Language Learning , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[50]  Paula M. Winke,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LANGUAGE LEARNER: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[51]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. , 1990 .

[52]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[53]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[54]  Karen Roehr,et al.  Metalinguistic Knowledge in L2 Task Performance: A Verbal Protocol Analysis , 2006 .

[55]  Priti Shah,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Models of Working Memory: An Introduction , 1999 .

[56]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition , 2001 .

[57]  Leonore Ganschow,et al.  Aptitude for learning a foreign language , 2001, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[58]  Yuko Goto Butler,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS' THEORIES ON THE USE OF ENGLISH ARTICLES , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[59]  J. Ellis,et al.  Retrieval Cue Specificity and the Realization of Delayed Intentions , 1996 .