Cognitive style factors affecting database query performance

Abstract As end-user computing becomes more pervasive, an organization's success increasingly depends on the ability of end-users, usually in managerial positions, to extract appropriate data from both internal and external sources. Many of these data sources include or are derived from the organization's accounting information systems. Managerial end-users with different personal characteristics and approaches are likely to compose queries of differing levels of accuracy when searching the data contained within these accounting information systems. This research investigates how cognitive style elements of personality influence managerial end-user performance in database querying tasks. A laboratory experiment was conducted in which participants generated queries to retrieve information from an accounting information system to satisfy typical information requirements. The experiment investigated the influence of personality on the accuracy of queries of varying degrees of complexity. Relying on the Myers–Briggs personality instrument, results show that perceiving individuals (as opposed to judging individuals) who rely on intuition (as opposed to sensing) composed queries more accurately. As expected, query complexity and academic performance also explain the success of data extraction tasks.

[1]  Hilmar Nordvik Relationships between Holland's vocational typology, Schein's career anchors and Myers—Briggs' types , 1996 .

[2]  P. L. Ferdinandi Facilitating communications , 1998 .

[3]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success , 1995, MIS Q..

[4]  A. Furnham The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality , 1996 .

[5]  D. D. Wheeler,et al.  The Myers-Briggs Personality Type and Its Relationship to Computer Programming , 1994 .

[6]  Rendel D. de Jong,et al.  Personality, Self‐Efficacy and Functioning in Management Teams: A Contribution to Validation , 1999 .

[7]  G. W. Dickson,et al.  The behavioral side of MIS Some aspects of the "people problem" , 1970 .

[8]  W. Paul Jones,et al.  Computer Use and Cognitive Style , 1994 .

[9]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Client/Server System Success: Exploring the Human Side , 1997 .

[10]  Boon Wan Tan,et al.  The impact of interface customization on the effect of cognitive style on information system success , 1991 .

[11]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Implications of User Characteristics in Information Seeking on the World Wide Web , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  C. Schewe The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis , 1976 .

[13]  T. Reponen,et al.  Personality's impact on information management strategy formulation , 1996 .

[14]  Chaya Garg,et al.  Connecting Culture, User Characteristics and User Interface Design , 1999, HCI.

[15]  Annabel M. Johnson,et al.  A Higher Order Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 2001 .

[16]  Rob Feltham,et al.  Interim Managers: Distinguishing Personality Characteristics of Managers on Short-term Contracts , 1999 .

[17]  Paul G. Schloemer,et al.  The Personality Types and Preferences of CPA Firm Professionals: An Analysis of Changes in the Profession , 1997 .

[18]  Roger W. Harris Attitudes towards end-user computing: A structural equation model , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[20]  Ron Weber,et al.  An Ontological Model of an Information System , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[21]  Patricia L. Ferdinandi Facilitating Communication , 1998, IEEE Softw..

[22]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Converging end-user and corporate computing , 1993, CACM.

[23]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[24]  Joy Teague,et al.  Personality type, career preference and implications for computer science recruitment and teaching , 1998, ACSE '98.

[25]  M. M. Capraro,et al.  Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Score Reliability Across: Studies a Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study , 2002 .

[26]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[27]  Robin Milner,et al.  Elements of interaction: Turing award lecture , 1993, CACM.

[28]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s , 1991, MIS Q..

[29]  Maurice H. Halstead,et al.  Elements of software science , 1977 .

[30]  Richard J. Koubek,et al.  An empirical evaluation of knowledge, cognitive style, and structure upon the performance of a hypertext task , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Thomas Redman,et al.  The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise , 1998, CACM.

[32]  S. Fukuda,et al.  Development of man-machine interfaces based on user preferences , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA'01) (Cat. No.01CH37204).

[33]  Patrick R. Wheeler The Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator and Applications to Accounting Education and Research , 2001 .

[34]  J. Isaak Standards should be set by officially recognized bodies , 1998, IEEE Software.