A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study.

[1]  D. Vanel.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? , 2002, Radiology.

[7]  J. Elmore,et al.  Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography? , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Helen C. Cowley,et al.  Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  L. Liberman,et al.  Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  R. Warren,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study , 2000 .

[12]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M O Leach,et al.  Rationale for a national multi-centre study of magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer. , 2000, Breast.

[14]  E. Grabbe,et al.  A multipurpose phantom for quality assurance of contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast , 2000, European Radiology.

[15]  M S Soo,et al.  Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  T W Redpath,et al.  Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI using two‐ and three‐dimensional variable flip angle fast low‐angle shot , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  D. Mitchell,et al.  MR imaging: quality assessment method and ratings at 33 centers. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[22]  P. J. Huber.  The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[23]  G. Irvine.  ROYAL HOSPITAL, HASLAR.: A CASE OF CEREBRAL HÆMORRHAGE PRESENTING SEVERAL UNUSUAL FEATURES ; NECROPSY , 1900 .

[24]  A. Prichard.  Bristol Royal Infirmary , 1857, British medical journal.