Vertical linear self-motion perception during visual and inertial motion: more than weighted summation of sensory inputs.

We evaluated visual and vestibular contributions to vertical self motion perception by exposing subjects to various combinations of 0.2 Hz vertical linear oscillation and visual scene motion. The visual stimuli presented via a head-mounted display consisted of video recordings of the test chamber from the perspective of the subject seated in the oscillator. In the dark, subjects accurately reported the amplitude of vertical linear oscillation with only a slight tendency to underestimate it. In the absence of inertial motion, even low amplitude oscillatory visual motion induced the perception of vertical self-oscillation. When visual and vestibular stimulation were combined, self-motion perception persisted in the presence of large visual-vestibular discordances. A dynamic visual input with magnitude discrepancies tended to dominate the resulting apparent self-motion, but vestibular effects were also evident. With visual and vestibular stimulation either spatially or temporally out-of-phase with one another, the input that dominated depended on their amplitudes. High amplitude visual scene motion was almost completely dominant for the levels tested. These findings are inconsistent with self-motion perception being determined by simple weighted summation of visual and vestibular inputs and constitute evidence against sensory conflict models. They indicate that when the presented visual scene is an accurate representation of the physical test environment, it dominates over vestibular inputs in determining apparent spatial position relative to external space.

[1]  H. Gurnee Thresholds of vertical movement of the body. , 1934 .

[2]  E. Walsh THE PERCEPTION OF RHYTHMICALLY REPEATED LINEAR MOTION IN THE VERTICAL PLANE. , 1964, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[3]  L R Young,et al.  Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  R. Malcolm,et al.  Erroneous perception of vertical motion by humans seated in the upright position. , 1974, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  W. Bles,et al.  Differential effects of ambivalent visual-vestibular-somatosensory stimulation on the perception of self-motion , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  A Straube,et al.  Importance of the visual and vestibular cortex for self-motion perception in man (circularvection). , 1987, Human neurobiology.

[7]  G. Paige,et al.  Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Delorme,et al.  Roll, pitch, longitudinal and yaw vection visually induced by optical flow in flight simulation conditions. , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  B J Frost,et al.  Linear Vection in the Central Visual Field Facilitated by Kinetic Depth Cues , 1992, Perception.

[10]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  B J Frost,et al.  Factors affecting the onset and magnitude of linear vection , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  M. Ohmi Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  A Weindl,et al.  Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations. A PET activation study. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  T. Brandt,et al.  Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  D E Angelaki,et al.  Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. III. Responses To translation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  T. Brandt,et al.  The Vestibular Cortex: Its Locations, Functions, and Disorders , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  L. Harris,et al.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  W. Bles,et al.  Cognitive Suppression of Tilt Sensations during Linear Horizontal Self-Motion in the Dark , 2001, Perception.

[19]  M. Tonoike,et al.  Magnetic cortical responses evoked by visual linear forward acceleration , 2002, Neuroreport.

[20]  L. R. Young,et al.  Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  L. R. Young,et al.  Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions , 1975, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration: the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.