Sorting out inherent features of head-to-head gene pairs by evolutionary conservation

BackgroundA ‘head-to-head’ (h2h) gene pair is defined as a genomic locus in which two adjacent genes are divergently transcribed from opposite strands of DNA. In our previous work, this gene organization was found to be ancient and conserved, which subjects functionally related genes to transcriptional co-regulation. However, some of the biological features of h2h pairs still need further clarification.ResultsIn this work, we assorted human h2h pairs into four sequentially inclusive sets of gradually incremental conservation, and examined whether those previously asserted features were conserved or sharpened in the more conserved h2h pair sets in order to identify the inherent features of the h2h gene organization. The features of TSS distance, expression correlation within h2h pairs and among h2h genes, transcription factor association and functional similarities of h2h genes were examined. Our conservation-based analyses found that the bi-directional promoters of h2h gene pairs are most likely shorter than 100 bp; h2h gene pairs generally have only significant positive expression correlation but not negative correlation, and remarkably high positive expression correlations exist among h2h genes, as well as between h2h pairs observed in our previous study; h2h paired genes tend to share transcription factors. In addition, expression correlation of h2h pairs is positively related with the TF-sharing and functional coordination, while not related with TSS distance.ConclusionsOur findings remove the uncertainties of h2h genes about TSS distance, expression correlation and functional coordination, which provide insights into the study on the molecular mechanisms and functional consequences of the transcriptional regulation based on this special gene organization.

[1]  Dekang Lin,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity , 1998, ICML.

[2]  J. Issa,et al.  Silencing of bidirectional promoters by DNA methylation in tumorigenesis. , 2006, Cancer research.

[3]  Mary Yang,et al.  Comprehensive Annotation of Bidirectional Promoters Identifies Co-Regulation among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  R. Myers,et al.  An abundance of bidirectional promoters in the human genome. , 2003, Genome research.

[5]  Mary Qu Yang,et al.  Prediction-based approaches to characterize bidirectional promoters in the mammalian genome , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[6]  Hui Yu,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Head-to-Head Gene Organization: Evolutionary Conservation and Potential Biological Relevance , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Why Is the Correlation between Gene Importance and Gene Evolutionary Rate So Weak? , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Transcription factor binding and modified histones in human bidirectional promoters. , 2007, Genome research.

[9]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Whole-Genome Shotgun Assembly and Analysis of the Genome of Fugu rubripes , 2002, Science.

[10]  Mary Yang,et al.  Comparative analyses of bidirectional promoters in vertebrates , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy , 1995, IJCAI.

[12]  M. Lieber,et al.  Bidirectional Gene Organization A Common Architectural Feature of the Human Genome , 2002, Cell.

[13]  Qing Yang,et al.  ITFP: an integrated platform of mammalian transcription factors , 2008, Bioinform..

[14]  J. T. Kadonaga,et al.  The RNA polymerase II core promoter. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[15]  K. Kinoshita,et al.  Rank of Correlation Coefficient as a Comparable Measure for Biological Significance of Gene Coexpression , 2009, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[16]  Tim Hulsen,et al.  Evolution of closely linked gene pairs in vertebrate genomes. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  COXPRESdb: a database of coexpressed gene networks in mammals , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Holger Fröhlich,et al.  GOSim – an R-package for computation of information theoretic GO similarities between terms and gene products , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  Xiang Shen,et al.  DBH2H: vertebrate head-to-head gene pairs annotated at genomic and post-genomic levels , 2009, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.