Visualizing the Core-Periphery Distinction in Theory Domains

As specific parts of a theory are refined over time, the aggregated set of variables and associations of multiple theory instances provide the identity of a theory domain. This research applies a meta-theoretical analysis to the problem of theory identity and the core-periphery distinction. The theoretico-empirical network for quantitative publications over a 20 year span of two top Information Systems journals is analysed and visualized to illustrate these aspects of theory. The analysis provides insight into the density of research in specific theory domains, the verisimilitude and explanatory ubiquity of core versus peripheral postulates, and suggests opportunities for increasing explanatory depth and integration in select theory domains.

[1]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1953, Nature.

[2]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[4]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[5]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1974, Nature.

[6]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[7]  L. Darden,et al.  Interfield Theories , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[10]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[11]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[12]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[13]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[15]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  The State of Theoretical Diversity , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[19]  Todd A. Grantham,et al.  Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science* , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  Zoonky Lee,et al.  The Evolving Intellectual Diversity of the IS Discipline: Evidence from the Referent Disciplines , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Gregory T. Smith.  On construct validity: issues of method and measurement. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[22]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline , 2008, MIS Q..

[23]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  Thirty Years of IS Research: Core Artifacts and Academic Identity , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Michael Wade,et al.  Theoretical Constructs and Relationships in Information Systems Research , 2009 .

[27]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[28]  Jingjing Li,et al.  Establishing Nomological Networks for Behavioral Science: a Natural Language Processing Based Approach , 2011, ICIS.

[29]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Detmar Straub,et al.  Does MIS Have Native Theories , 2012 .