Early Stages of Technology-Intensive Companies in Southern California

Purpose: Numerous stage models have attempted to clarify management priorities during the early stages of companies. However, a need for more focused and context-specific studies exists. This study seeks to clarify the early stages of technology- intensive companies in Southern California. To summarise the research questions, the authors ask: What early stages do technology-intensive companies face based on empirically based stage literature? How do the experiences of managers in early-stage technology-intensive companies relate to assumptions of such stage framework? What viewpoints should be considered when using stage framework in context of Southern California? Design/methodology/approach: To answer these questions, this retrospective multiple case study devises a four-stage framework describing early stages of technology-intensive companies and reflects it through nine case studies. The study utilises sequential incident technique (SIT) and semi-structured interviews in data collection. Three perspectives were analysed in each case company for triangulation purposes – one from company management, one from operations management, and one from marketing management. Findings: The applicability of the framework will be clarified in this study; moreover, an analysis of context-specific viewpoints will be provided. It is necessary to recognise these viewpoints when using this framework in Southern California. Research limitations/implications: The research focus of this study is limited to the context studied. This limits the applicability of the explorative and descriptive results to other contexts. Practical implications: The results of the study may be effectively used in intermediary organisations and companies as framework for predicting the early-stages of technology intensive companies. Originality/value: The context specific viewpoints and their affect to the early stages of company have not been broadly studied - this study takes the context into account and provides new insights into growth-management of technology-intensive companies in the studied context.

[1]  Besrat Tesfaye,et al.  Patterns of Formation and Development of High-Technology Entrepreneurs , 1997 .

[2]  Dwayne D. Gremler.  The Critical Incident Technique in Service Research , 2004 .

[3]  Johan Wiklund.  Small Firm Growth and Performance : Entrepreneurship and Beyond , 1998 .

[4]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  The Determinants of New Venture Success , 2003 .

[5]  Bo Edvardsson,et al.  Critical incident techniques: Towards a framework for analysing the criticality of critical incidents , 2001 .

[6]  David C. McClelland,et al.  The Achieving Society. , 1964 .

[7]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[8]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[9]  O. Williamson.  Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[10]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[11]  V. Simões,et al.  Born Globals: Evolution and Revolution as Organisations Grow , 2012 .

[12]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[13]  Shelagh Fisher,et al.  The Critical Incident Technique in Library and Information Management Research , 1999, Educ. Inf..

[14]  N. Churchill,et al.  The Five Stages of Small Business Growth , 1983 .

[15]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Pekka Kess,et al.  Business growth models: review of past 60 years , 2010 .

[17]  David J. Storey,et al.  Public Policy Measures to Support New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union , 1998 .

[18]  Matti Muhos.  Early stages of technology intensive companies , 2011 .

[19]  Bernd Stauß,et al.  Process‐oriented measurement of service quality: Applying the sequential incident technique , 1997 .