Mixed-Initiative Optimization in Security Games: A Preliminary Report

Stackelberg games have been widely used to model patrolling or monitoring problems in security. In a Stackelberg security game, the defender commits to a strategy and the adversary makes its decision with knowledge of the leader’s commitment. Algorithms for computing the defender’s optimal strategy are used in deployed decision-support tools in use by the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), the Federal Air Marshals Service, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Those algorithms take into account various resource usage constraints defined by human users. However, those constraints may lead to poor (even infeasible) solutions due to users’ insufficient information and bounded rationality. A mixed-initiative approach, in which human users and software assistants (agents) collaborate to make security decisions, is needed. Efficient human-agent interaction process leads to models with higher overall solution quality. This paper preliminarily analyzes the needs and challenges for such a mixed-initiative approach.

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  An efficient heuristic approach for security against multiple adversaries , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[2]  Manish Jain,et al.  Software Assistants for Randomized Patrol Planning for the LAX Airport Police and the Federal Air Marshal Service , 2010, Interfaces.

[3]  Manish Jain,et al.  Security Games with Arbitrary Schedules: A Branch and Price Approach , 2010, AAAI.

[4]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Adjustable Autonomy for the Real World , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[5]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Security and Game Theory: IRIS – A Tool for Strategic Security Allocation in Transportation Networks , 2011, AAMAS 2011.

[6]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Intelligent Personal Assistant for Task and Time Management , 2007, AI Mag..

[7]  James F. Allen,et al.  Mixed-Initiative Systems for Collaborative Problem Solving , 2007, AI Mag..

[8]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Using multiagent teams to improve the training of incident commanders , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[9]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Deployed ARMOR protection: the application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport , 2008, AAMAS 2008.

[10]  Gheorghe Tecuci,et al.  Seven Aspects of Mixed-Initiative Reasoning: An Introduction to this Special Issue on Mixed-Initiative Assistants , 2007, AI Mag..

[11]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  Manish Jain,et al.  Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games , 2009, AAMAS.

[13]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  DiamondHelp: A Generic Collaborative Task Guidance System , 2007, AI Mag..

[14]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Improving adjustable autonomy strategies for time-critical domains , 2009, AAMAS.