The influence of transport on industrial location choice: a stated preference experiment

Stated preference experiments are introduced and applied to an investigation of the influence of road transport and other factors on industrial location in terms of the ex ante decision making process. The experiments, based upon repeated hypothetical discrete choices between pairs of locations, involved respondents from firms making trade-offs between the various characteristics in a fractional factorial, orthogonal survey design. In each defined case, a clear hierarchy of location factors emerged. These were found to vary according to the origin of the firm - classified as local relocations, foreign inward investors, and branch plants sourced from national bases. The importance of road links to location choice varied considerably between these groups with the latter rating motorway links the highest of any of the groups of firms. In contrast, overseas sourced branch firms found road links largely unimportant, being outweighed primarily by considerations of workforce and premises. Local relocations fell into two distinct groups with respect to the importance attached to road links (between relatively important and non-important), whilst considering the other factors similarly. Good public transport provision emerged as a statistically significant factor only in certain scenarios. Finally, the paper discusses implications for location choice models in transport and further research.

[1]  W. Clark Scale effects in international migration to the United States. , 1996, Regional studies.

[2]  Marco Antonio Farah Caldas,et al.  Formulating a methodology for modelling revealed preference discrete choice data—the selectively replicated logit estimation , 1997 .

[3]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Stated preference methods and travel demand forecasting: An examination of the scale factor problem , 1991 .

[4]  Paul Krugman,et al.  WHAT'S NEW ABOUT THE NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY? , 1998 .

[5]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  Making Business Location Decisions , 1982 .

[6]  Michael R Couture,et al.  ANALYZING TRAVELER ATTITUDES TO RESOLVE INTENDED AND ACTUAL USE OF A NEW TRANSIT SERVICE , 1981 .

[7]  Peter O. Barnard,et al.  THE ROLE OF STATED PREFERENCE METHODS IN STUDIES OF TRAVEL CHOICE , 1987 .

[8]  E P Kroes,et al.  STATED PREFERENCE TECHNIQUES: A GUIDE TO PRACTICE , 1990 .

[9]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change , 1996 .

[10]  Ronald W McQuaid,et al.  Accessibility and Location Decisions in a Peripheral Region of Europe: A Logit Analysis , 1996 .

[11]  M. Storper The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[12]  A. Daly,et al.  Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data , 1994 .

[13]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[15]  D. Hensher Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice , 1994 .

[16]  Randall G. Chapaaan,et al.  Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility Model , 1982 .

[17]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice analysis , 1989 .

[18]  Ronald W McQuaid,et al.  Transport and industrial and commercial location , 1995 .

[19]  P. Rietveld Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure supply , 1994 .

[20]  P. Rietveld Infrastructure and regional development , 1989 .

[21]  Mark Wardman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR , 1988 .

[22]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice , 1994 .

[23]  Cynthia Chen,et al.  Stated choice: a study in predictive validity using an aggregate truth set , 1998 .

[24]  Peter Mackie,et al.  Induced traffic and economic appraisal , 1996 .

[25]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Stated Choice Experiments with Repeated Observations , 1996 .

[26]  G Kocur,et al.  GUIDE TO FORECASTING TRAVEL DEMAND WITH DIRECT UTILITY ASSESSMENT , 1981 .

[27]  D. McFadden Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments , 1977 .

[28]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  Logistical restructuring and road freight traffic growth , 1996 .

[29]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[30]  R. Sheldon,et al.  STATED PREFERENCE METHODS. AN INTRODUCTION , 1988 .

[31]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  The External Validity of Choice Models Based on Laboratory Choice Experiments , 1990 .

[32]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The barely revealed preference behind road investment priorities , 1997 .

[33]  Joseph Berechman Urban and regional economic impacts of transportation investment: A critical assessment and proposed methodology , 1994 .

[34]  Kenneth Button,et al.  What Can Meta-analysis Tell Us about the Implications of Transport? , 1995 .