When Soft Spaces Harden: The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

This paper investigates the first ever so-called ‘macroregional strategy’ developed under the aegis of the European Commission: the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR). Through a drawing together of elements of actor-network theory and regionalization theory, it is argued that the adoption of the EUSBSR can be seen as a milestone within a wider process towards Baltic Sea regionalization, whereby the Baltic Sea region is increasingly ‘solidified’ through the positioning of the European Commission as a spokesperson for the interests of the region. It is further suggested that, if not seriously contested, the possible acceptance of the European Commission as a designated regional spokesperson might be a crucial step in a process whereby the soft space of the Baltic Sea Region may gradually become more formalized. Nonetheless, caution must be taken so as not to confuse degrees of formal institutional fixity with degrees of durability.

[1]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[2]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[3]  J. Morphet.  The New Spatial Planning Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries , 2010 .

[4]  A. Faludi.  Centenary paper: European spatial planning: past, present and future , 2010 .

[5]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance , 2007 .

[6]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space , 2005 .

[7]  A. Pike.  Editorial: Whither Regional Studies? , 2007 .

[8]  Graham Haughton,et al.  Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces , 2010 .

[9]  Alex Lord,et al.  From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State , 2006 .

[10]  B. Latour.  On Technical Mediation , 1994 .

[11]  N. Thrift.  Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[12]  Claire Colomb,et al.  European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation , 2010 .

[13]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[14]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[15]  Antje Matern,et al.  Metropolregionen: Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsfähigkeit , 2009 .

[16]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity , 2003 .

[17]  P. Healey.  Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times , 2006 .

[18]  Patsy Healey Obe.  Making choices that matter: the practical art of situated strategic judgement in spatial strategy-making , 2008 .

[19]  Anssi Paasi,et al.  The institutionalization of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity , 1986 .

[20]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro- structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so , 2014 .

[21]  Anssi Paasi,et al.  Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing 'regional identity' , 2002 .

[22]  Peter Schmitt,et al.  EU macro-regions and macro-regional strategies – A scoping study , 2009 .

[23]  Anssi Paasi,et al.  Regions are social constructs, but who or what 'constructs' them? Agency in question , 2010 .

[24]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[25]  Переосмысляя территорию,et al.  RETHINKING TERRITORY , 2014 .

[26]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  Some new instructions for travellers: The geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres , 2000 .

[27]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[28]  A. Faludi,et al.  The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan , 2002 .

[29]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces , 2002 .

[30]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 1999 .

[31]  Joe Painter.  Cartographic Anxiety and the Search for Regionality , 2008 .

[32]  Dominic Stead,et al.  Policy & Planning Brief , 2011 .

[33]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[34]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[35]  A. Mol.  Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[36]  J. Murdoch.  The spaces of actor-network theory , 1998 .

[37]  J. Law,et al.  Materialities, spatialities, globalities. , 2000 .

[38]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[39]  M. Wise.  From Atlantic Arc to Atlantic Area: A Case of Subsidiarity Against the Regions? , 2000 .

[40]  G. Macleod,et al.  Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question , 2004 .

[41]  Patsy Healey Obe.  Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times , 2007 .

[42]  A. Donaldson.  Performing Regions: Territorial Development and Cultural Politics in a Europe of the Regions , 2006 .

[43]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[44]  Gordon MacLeod,et al.  Renewing the Geography of Regions , 2001 .

[45]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Multi-level Governance and Multi-level Metagovernance Changes in the European Union as Integral Moments in the Transformation and Reorientation of Contemporary Statehood. , 2004 .

[46]  J. Metzger.  Neither Revolution, Nor Resignation: (Re)Democratizing Contemporary Planning Praxis: A Commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton's “Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces” , 2011 .

[47]  N. Thrift,et al.  Spatial Formations , 1998 .

[48]  M. Wise.  The Atlantic Arc: Transnational European Reality or Regional Mirage? , 2000 .

[49]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  The Place of Complexity , 1999 .

[50]  D. Harvey,et al.  Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference , 1997 .

[51]  A. Paasi.  Place and region: regional worlds and words , 2002 .

[52]  U. J. Rivolin.  European spatial planning and territorial cooperation , 2010 .

[53]  Geoff Vigar,et al.  The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries , 2009 .

[54]  François Cooren.  Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism , 2010 .

[55]  Phil Allmendinger,et al.  Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway , 2009 .

[56]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..