Electrophysiological correlates of eye gaze adaptation.

Recent research shows a strong effect of adaptation on gaze perception: Adaptation to faces with eye gaze constantly diverted in one direction subsequently impairs the perception of that gaze direction. A previous study on the neural correlates of this effect found that N170 amplitudes to test faces were strongly attenuated following adaptation. ERP modulations as a function of gaze direction adaptation, however, were found only later (250-350 ms). Here, we used a new paradigm to study the exact nature of both the gaze direction-invariant N170 attenuation effect and the direction-specific effects in later time windows. We compared the ability to classify gaze direction before and after adaptation to direct gaze (control condition) or to eye gaze diverted to the right (adaptation condition). Behavioral results clearly replicated earlier findings of an impaired perception of eye gaze directed to the adapted side. The ERP analysis confirmed an insensitivity of the N170 to gaze adaptation, suggesting that reported attenuations resulted from adaptation to generic face information irrespective of gaze direction. Occipitotemporal ERPs ∼250-350 ms showed direction-specific modulations with most positive amplitudes in response to stimuli gazing in the direction of adaptation. Finally, there was an effect in the parietal late positive component ∼400-600 ms, which we interpret as a neural correlate of adaptation-induced novelty detection.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans , 2004, Neuroreport.

[4]  C. Clifford,et al.  Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The temporal decay of eye gaze adaptation effects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  About Turn , 2009, Psychological science.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Kohn.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A. Calder,et al.  Neural mechanisms of social attention , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The motion aftereffect , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Huynh,et al.  Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs , 1976 .

[14]  P. Schyns,et al.  A principled method for determining the functionality of brain responses , 2003, Neuroreport.

[15]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Seyama,et al.  Eye direction aftereffect , 2006, Psychological research.

[17]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  In the ear of the beholder: neural correlates of adaptation to voice gender , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  G. Kovács,et al.  Position-specificity of facial adaptation , 2005, Neuroreport.

[19]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  G. Kovács,et al.  Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects , 2007, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Hai-Qing Gong,et al.  Luminance adaptation increased the contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells , 2005, Neuroreport.

[24]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Neural Correlates of Generic versus Gender-specific Face Adaptation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[29]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[31]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation , 2007, Neuroreport.

[32]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Category Specificity in Early Perception: Face and Word N170 Responses Differ in Both Lateralization and Habituation Properties , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[34]  R. Jenkins,et al.  I Thought You Were Looking at Me , 2006, Psychological science.

[35]  F. Fang,et al.  Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[36]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[37]  R. Dolan,et al.  Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule , 2007, Current Biology.

[38]  S. Langton.  The Mutual Influence of Gaze and Head Orientation in the Analysis of Social Attention Direction , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002 .

[41]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  N Kanwisher,et al.  THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF FACE PROCESSING: AN INTRODUCTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[43]  E. Donchin.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Patrick Berg,et al.  Artifact Correction of the Ongoing EEG Using Spatial Filters Based on Artifact and Brain Signal Topographies , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.