Construction des modèles radiobiologiques de type TCP (tumor control probability) et NTCP (normal tissue complication probability) : de la dose à la prédiction des effets cliniques

In radiotherapy, the dose prescription is currently based on discretized dose-effects records that do not take into fully account for the complexity of the patient-dose-response relationship. Their predictive performance on both anti-tumour efficacy and toxicity can be optimized by integrating radiobiological models. It is with this in mind that the calculation models TCP (Tumor Control Probability) and NTCP (Normal Tissue Complication Probability) have been developed. Their construction involves several important steps that are necessary and important to understand. The first step is based on radiobiological models allowing to calculate according to more or less complexity the rate of surviving cells after irradiation. Two additional steps are required to convert the physical dose into an equivalent biological dose, in particular a 2Gy equivalent biological dose (EQD2): first to take into account the effect of the fractionation of the dose for both the target volume and the organs at risk; second to convert an heterogeneous dose to an organ into an homogeneous dose having the same effect (Niemierko generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)). Finally, the process of predicting clinical effects based on radiobiological models transform doses into tumour control (TCP) or toxicity (NTCP) probabilities using parameters that reflect the radiobiological characteristics of the tissues in question. The use of these models in current practice is still limited, but since the radiotherapy softwares increasingly integrate them, it is important to know the principle and limits of application of these models.

[1]  P. Bondiau,et al.  Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[2]  J F Fowler,et al.  21 years of biologically effective dose. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  H D Thames,et al.  An 'incomplete-repair' model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. , 1985, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[5]  A. Niemierko Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[6]  A Brahme,et al.  Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  Fowler Jf Half-times of irradiation recovery in accelerated partialbreast irradiation: Incomplete recovery as a potentially dangerous enhancer of radiation damage , 2013 .

[8]  F. Stewart,et al.  Does incomplete repair explain the apparent failure of the basic LQ model to predict spinal cord and kidney responses to low doses per fraction? , 1988, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  G Noël,et al.  [Delineation of organs at risk and dose constraints]. , 2016, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[10]  A. Barrett,et al.  The linear-quadratic transformation of dose-volume histograms in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  A. Puisieux,et al.  L’énigme de l’interprétation biologique du modèle linéaire-quadratique enfin résolue ? Une synthèse pour les non-mathématiciens , 2016 .

[12]  M. Spang‐Thomsen,et al.  Growth curves of three human malignant tumors transplanted to nude mice. , 1980, Experimental cell biology.

[13]  A. Nahum,et al.  Mechanistic simulation of normal-tissue damage in radiotherapy—implications for dose–volume analyses , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  M Goitein,et al.  Generalization of a model of tissue response to radiation based on the idea of functional subunits and binomial statistics. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H. Withers,et al.  Treatment volume and tissue tolerance. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  R. Oliver A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACUTE AND PROTRACTED GAMMA-RADIATION ON THE GROWTH OF SEEDLINGS OF VICIA FABA. II. THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS. , 1964, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[17]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  E. Yorke,et al.  Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  C. Burman,et al.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J. Lyman Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms , 1985 .

[21]  Marco D'Andrea,et al.  Modeling Radiotherapy Induced Normal Tissue Complications: An Overview beyond Phenomenological Models , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[22]  J F Fowler,et al.  A review of alpha/beta ratios for experimental tumors: implications for clinical studies of altered fractionation. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  H. Withers,et al.  Tissue repair capacity and repair kinetics deduced from multifractionated or continuous irradiation regimens with incomplete repair. , 1984, The British journal of cancer. Supplement.

[24]  R G Dale,et al.  Time-dependent tumour repopulation factors in linear-quadratic equations--implications for treatment strategies. , 1989, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  A. Niemierko,et al.  A Model for Optimizing Normal Tissue Complication Probability in the Spinal Cord Using a Generalized Incomplete Repair Scheme , 2001, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[26]  A Brahme,et al.  Optimization of uncomplicated control for head and neck tumors. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J. Thariat,et al.  Dosimetrical and radiobiological approach to manage the dosimetric shift in the transition of dose calculation algorithm in radiation oncology: how to improve high quality treatment and avoid unexpected outcomes? , 2018, Radiation oncology.