New strategies for planning and performance evaluation of wireless networks: case studies based on the cross-layer approach

The use of wireless local area networks, called WLANs, as well as the proliferation of the use of multimedia applications have grown rapidly in recent years. Some factors affect the quality of service (QoS) received by the user and interference is one of them. This work presents strategies for planning and performance evaluation through an empirical study of the QoS parameters of a voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) application in an interference network, as well as the relevance in the design of wireless networks to determine the coverage area of an access point, taking into account several parameters such as power, jitter, packet loss, delay, and PMOS. Another strategy is based on a hybrid approach that considers measuring and Bayesian inference applied to wireless networks, taking into consideration QoS parameters. The models take into account a cross layer vision of networks, correlating aspects of the physical environment, on the signal propagation (power or distance) with aspects of VoIP applications (e.g., jitter and packet loss). Case studies were carried out for two indoor environments and two outdoor environments, one of them displaying main characteristics of the Amazon region (e.g., densely arboreous environments). This last test bed was carried out in a real system because the Government of the State of Para has a digital inclusion program called NAVEGAPARA.

[1]  Alex Hills,et al.  Large-scale wireless LAN design , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[2]  Fabrice Valois,et al.  Performance evaluation of 802.11 WLAN in a real indoor environment , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[3]  Marcos José Santana,et al.  Performance evaluation based on system modeling using Statecharts extensions , 2005, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[4]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Providing statistical QoS guarantee for voice over IP in the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  Stephen R. Gulliver,et al.  The Perceptual and Attentive Impact of Delay and Jitter in Multimedia Delivery , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[6]  Fabio Kon,et al.  Is IEEE 802.11 ready for VoIP? , 2006, 2006 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.

[7]  Nandamudi Lankalapalli Vijaykumar,et al.  The Influence of Interference Networks in QoS Parameters in a WLAN 802.11g Environment , 2007, ISPA.

[8]  METHODS FOR SUBJECTIVE DETERMINATION OF TRANSMISSION QUALITY Summary , 2022 .

[9]  Toshikazu Kodama,et al.  Voice capacity of IEEE 802.11b, 802.11a and 802.11g wireless LANs , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[10]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  Providing statistical QoS guarantee for voice over IP in the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs , 2006, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[11]  L.E.N. Diaz,et al.  A Model for Designing WLAN's 802.11 for VoIP , 2006, Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'06).

[12]  Fabrice Valois,et al.  Indoor wLAN Planning with a QoS constraint based on a Markovian Performance Evaluation Model , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[13]  Herminio S. Gomes,et al.  The influence of interference networks in QoS parameters in a WLAN 802.11g: a Bayesian approach , 2007, SPIE Optics East.

[14]  Irina Cotanis Speaker bias in speech quality evaluation over end-to end communication links , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[15]  Laurie G. Cuthbert,et al.  Intelligent radio resource management for IEEE 802.11 WLAN , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[16]  Ádamo L. de Santana,et al.  Strategies for improving the modeling and interpretability of Bayesian networks , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..