MORPH—An individual-based model to predict the effect of environmental change on foraging animal populations

This paper describes an individual-based model, MORPH, that has been designed to predict the effect of environmental change on foraging animal populations. The key assumptions of MORPH are that individuals within populations behave in order to maximise their perceived fitness, but that perceived fitness may not always be positively related to the actual chances of survival and reproduction. MORPH has been parameterised for coastal birds on several European sites and predicted the effect of environmental change, caused by factors such as habitat loss, disturbance from humans and sea-level rise, on the survival and body condition of these species. However, MORPH contains a basic framework to describe animal physiology and foraging behaviour, and the distribution and abundance of the resources required by these animals. Therefore, MORPH is not restricted to coastal birds, and is potentially applicable to a wider range of systems. To be applied to a forager system, MORPH requires parameters describing (i) the distribution of the food supply and how food quality and abundance changes through time; (ii) the rate at which foragers consume food given the abundance of food and competitors; (iii) the amount of food the forager must consume each day to survive; (iv) the distribution and seasonal changes in other factors which influence the foraging behaviour and survival of foragers. The purpose of this paper is to (i) describe MORPH, (ii) give examples of its application, (iii) describe the types of systems to which MORPH can be applied, and (iv) publish its source code and a user guide.

[1]  J. Goss‐Custard The oystercatcher : from individuals to populations , 1996 .

[2]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Modelling the efficacy of proposed mitigation areas for shorebirds: a case study on the Seine estuary, France , 2005 .

[3]  J. Battin When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal Populations , 2004 .

[4]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[5]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management , 1994 .

[6]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Intertidal habitat loss and wildfowl numbers: applications of a spatial depletion model , 1998 .

[7]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[8]  Bruno J. Ens,et al.  Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators , 1997 .

[9]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I: Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis , 1995 .

[10]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Changes in commercially fished shellfish stocks and shorebird populations in the Wash, England , 2003 .

[11]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling , 2001 .

[12]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Modelling the effect of environmental change on shorebirds: A case study on Poole Harbour, UK , 2006 .

[13]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  An individual behaviour‐based model can predict shorebird mortality using routinely collected shellfishery data , 2003 .

[14]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[15]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Spatially explicit, individual-based, behavioural models of the annual cycle of two migratory goose populations , 2000 .

[16]  Matthieu Guillemain,et al.  Carrying capacity in overwintering birds: when are spatial models needed? , 2003 .

[17]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  From Individual Dispersal to Species Ranges: Perspectives for a Changing World , 2006, Science.

[18]  R. Stewart,et al.  Use of habitat-contamination spatial correlation to determine when to perform a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment , 2007 .

[19]  Machelle D. Wilson,et al.  Habitat and exposure modelling for ecological risk assessment: A case study for the raccoon on the Savannah River Site , 2005 .

[20]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Conserving Bird Biodiversity: Predicting the impact of environmental change , 2002 .

[21]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model , 2000 .