Effects of repetition and configural changes on the development of face recognition processes.

We investigated the effect of repetition on recognition of upright, inverted and contrast-reversed target faces in children from 8 to 15 years when engaged in a learning phase/test phase paradigm with target and distractor faces. Early (P1, N170) and late ERP components were analysed Children across age groups performed equally well, and were better at recognizing upright faces. However, teenagers and adults were equally accurate for all three face types. The neurophysiological responses to upright, inverted and negative faces matured until adulthood and showed different effects at different ages. P1 and N170 components were affected by face type at all ages, suggesting early configural disruption on encoding processes regardless of age. Frontal ERPs reflected the difficulty of processing these stimuli. Distinct repetition effects were seen at frontal, temporal frontal and parietal sites, suggesting differential involvement of these brain regions underlying working memory and recognition processes. Thus, a learning phase was sufficient (a) for 8-year-olds to perform as accurately as 15-year-olds and (b) to eliminate face type effects in teenagers and adults, but not in younger children.

[1]  C Ranganath,et al.  Brain waves following remembered faces index conscious recollection. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  H. Ellis The development of face processing skills. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  H. Leder Line Drawings of Faces Reduce Configural Processing , 1996, Perception.

[6]  A. Johnston,et al.  Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal , 1992, Perception.

[7]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[8]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[9]  D. Thomson,et al.  Development of face recognition. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[10]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Activation of Prefrontal Cortex in Children during a Nonspatial Working Memory Task with Functional MRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of rapid memory mechanisms in humans , 1994, Neuroreport.

[12]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[13]  Rugg,et al.  Memory retrieval: an electrophysiological perspective , 1999 .

[14]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Absence of Any Developmental Trend in Right Hemisphere Superiority for Face Recognition , 1980, Cortex.

[16]  C. Nelson,et al.  Discrimination and categorization of facial expressions of emotion during infancy , 1998 .

[17]  M. Baenninger The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? , 2001 .

[20]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[21]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  Margot J. Taylor Non-spatial attentional effects on P1 , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face Recognition Memory and Configural Processing: A Developmental ERP Study using Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reversed Faces , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Slater,et al.  Visual Processing of Stimulus Compounds in Newborn Infants , 1991, Perception.

[26]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[28]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Recollecting Faces of Known and Unknown Individuals , 2000, NeuroImage.

[29]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Set-and Code-Specific Activation in the Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study of Encoding and Retrieval of Faces and Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[31]  M. White,et al.  Effect of Photographic Negation on Matching the Expressions and Identities of Faces , 2001, Perception.

[32]  P. Huttenlocher Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  C. Bernard,et al.  Event-Related Potentials for Category-Specific Information During Passive Viewing of Faces and Objects , 2001, The International journal of neuroscience.

[35]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect , 1995 .

[38]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[39]  J L Dannemiller,et al.  A critical test of infant pattern preference models. , 1988, Child development.

[40]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[41]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[42]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[43]  Yael M. Cycowicz,et al.  Memory development and event-related brain potentials in children , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[44]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[45]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[46]  A. Freire,et al.  Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  W. Sommer,et al.  Differential localization of brain systems subserving memory for names and faces in normal subjects with event-related potentials. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[49]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[50]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study , 1967 .

[51]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face inversion and contrast-reversal effects across development: in contrast to the expertise theory. , 2004, Developmental science.

[52]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Configural Processing at Birth: Evidence for Perceptual Organisation , 2000, Perception.

[53]  C. Frith,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of episodic memory , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[55]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[56]  R. Kestenbaum,et al.  The recognition and categorization of upright and inverted emotional expressions by 7-month-old infants , 1990 .

[57]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[58]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[59]  W. Sommer,et al.  Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[60]  R Kemp,et al.  Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.

[61]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory for words. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[62]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .

[63]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[64]  D. Maurer,et al.  Face Perception During Early Infancy , 1999 .

[65]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[66]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[67]  R. Buxton,et al.  The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study , 2003 .

[68]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  The contributionof task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[69]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[70]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[71]  M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[72]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of human memory , 1995 .

[73]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[74]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[75]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[76]  V Bruce,et al.  The Use of Pigmentation and Shading Information in Recognising the Sex and Identities of Faces , 1994, Perception.

[77]  J. Bullinaria,et al.  Reviews: The Race for Consciousness, Fleeting Memories: Cognition of Brief Visual Stimuli, Evolving Thoughts on Thought and its Evolution, An Anatomy of Thought: The Origin and Machinery of the Mind , 2000 .

[78]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Recognition of faces of different species: a developmental study between 5 and 8 years of age , 2001 .

[79]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[80]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Thatcher Illusion as a Test of Configural Disruption , 1997, Perception.

[81]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[82]  David Friedman,et al.  ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words , 1990, Biological Psychology.

[83]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[84]  G. Pike,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Effect of Inversion: Using a Picture Book to Investigate Face Recognition , 2001, Perception.

[85]  M J Taylor,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of verbal and nonverbal short-term memory in children: repetition of words and faces. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[86]  E. Wilding In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[87]  D. Hay,et al.  Developmental changes in the recognition of faces and facial features. , 2000 .

[88]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[89]  H. Ellis,et al.  Encoding and storage effects in 7‐year‐olds' and 10‐year‐olds' memory for faces , 1990 .

[90]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.