Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Melvin J Yap,et al. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.
[2] M. Brysbaert,et al. Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting : A review and empirical validation , 2017 .
[3] Daiker. An Abundance of Riches , 2017 .
[4] Felix Hill,et al. SimVerb-3500: A Large-Scale Evaluation Set of Verb Similarity , 2016, EMNLP.
[5] Michael N. Jones,et al. Graph-Theoretic Properties of Networks Based on Word Association Norms: Implications for Models of Lexical Semantic Memory , 2016, Cogn. Sci..
[6] Ashley N. Danguecan,et al. Semantic Neighborhood Effects for Abstract versus Concrete Words , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[7] Francisco Pereira,et al. A comparative evaluation of off-the-shelf distributed semantic representations for modelling behavioural data , 2016, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[8] Gerrit Storms,et al. Structure and organization of the mental lexicon: A network approach derived from syntactic dependency relations and word associations , 2016 .
[9] Alexander Panchenko,et al. Noun Sense Induction and Disambiguation using Graph-Based Distributional Semantics , 2016, KONVENS.
[10] Akira Utsumi,et al. A Complex Network Approach to Distributional Semantic Models , 2015, PloS one.
[11] Alexander Mehler,et al. Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks , 2015 .
[12] Michael N. Jones,et al. Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[13] Paul D. Siakaluk,et al. Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] P. Hoffman,et al. Opposing Effects of Semantic Diversity in Lexical and Semantic Relatedness Decisions , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[15] Felix Hill,et al. SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models With (Genuine) Similarity Estimation , 2014, CL.
[16] Jeffrey Pennington,et al. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.
[17] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.
[18] Georgiana Dinu,et al. Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors , 2014, ACL.
[19] Carina Silberer,et al. Learning Grounded Meaning Representations with Autoencoders , 2014, ACL.
[20] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Get rich quick: The signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition , 2014, Cognition.
[21] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[22] Elia Bruni,et al. Multimodal Distributional Semantics , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[23] T. Rogers,et al. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[24] Alberto Testolin,et al. Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: a tutorial overview , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[25] Lenka Zdrazilova,et al. Grasping the invisible: Semantic processing of abstract words , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[26] Kirsty Kitto,et al. How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory , 2013, Memory & cognition.
[27] Nick Chater,et al. Networks in Cognitive Science , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[28] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.
[29] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.
[30] Danielle J. Navarro,et al. Better explanations of lexical and semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single-word associations , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[31] Michael N. Jones,et al. The semantic richness of abstract concepts , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[32] Paul D. Siakaluk,et al. Effects of Emotional and Sensorimotor Knowledge in Semantic Processing of Concrete and Abstract Nouns , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[33] Gemma Boleda,et al. Distributional Semantics in Technicolor , 2012, ACL.
[34] Brendan T. Johns,et al. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[35] M. Brysbaert,et al. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.
[36] Mark J. Huff,et al. An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[37] D. Mirman,et al. Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. , 2012, Psychological review.
[38] Thomas T. Hills,et al. Optimal foraging in semantic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.
[39] John A Bullinaria,et al. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: stop-lists, stemming, and SVD , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[40] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[41] Chris Biemann. Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation , 2012 .
[42] Amy Perfors,et al. Strong structure in weak semantic similarity: A graph based account , 2012, CogSci.
[43] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[44] Lidia Suárez,et al. Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[45] Michael N. Jones,et al. Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[46] Marc W. Howard,et al. Constructing Semantic Representations From a Gradually Changing Representation of Temporal Context , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[47] James L. McClelland,et al. Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] J. Tenenbaum,et al. Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[49] Petr Sojka,et al. Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora , 2010 .
[50] Alexandre Arenas,et al. Semantic Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2010, Entropy.
[51] Patrick Pantel,et al. From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[52] Massimo Poesio,et al. Strudel: A Corpus-Based Semantic Model Based on Properties and Types , 2010, Cogn. Sci..
[53] Ricard V. Solé,et al. Language networks: Their structure, function, and evolution , 2007, Complex..
[54] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. The Hidden Markov Topic Model: A Probabilistic Model of Semantic Representation , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[55] Peter Bruza,et al. Is There Something Quantum-Like about the Human Mental Lexicon? , 2009, INEX.
[56] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.
[57] D. Balota,et al. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[58] Gert Storms,et al. Word associations: Network and semantic properties , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[59] Gert Storms,et al. Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[60] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[61] Daniel Mirman,et al. Attractor Dynamics and Semantic Neighborhood Density: Processing Is Slowed by near Neighbors and Speeded by Distant Neighbors We Thank Ann Kulikowski for Her Help with Data Collection And , 2022 .
[62] T. Griffiths,et al. Google and the Mind , 2007, Psychological science.
[63] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[64] J. Bullinaria,et al. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[65] Mirella Lapata,et al. Dependency-Based Construction of Semantic Space Models , 2007, CL.
[66] Mark Steyvers,et al. Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.
[67] Michael N Jones,et al. Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. , 2007, Psychological review.
[68] H. Stadthagen-González,et al. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.
[69] D. Nelson,et al. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[70] Richard M. Shiffrin,et al. Word Association Spaces for Predicting Semantic Similarity Effects in Episodic Memory. , 2005 .
[71] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[72] R. Clark,et al. Competition and Cooperation , 2004 .
[73] James L. McClelland,et al. Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .
[74] Stefan Richter,et al. Centrality Indices , 2004, Network Analysis.
[75] M. Kahana. Associative symmetry and memory theory , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[76] R. Shillcock,et al. Rethinking the Word Frequency Effect: The Neglected Role of Distributional Information in Lexical Processing , 2001, Language and speech.
[77] Curt Burgess,et al. Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[78] N. Gee,et al. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998, Psychological review.
[79] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[80] Curt Burgess,et al. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .
[81] Geoffrey Leech,et al. CLAWS4: The Tagging of the British National Corpus , 1994, COLING.
[82] A. Roelofs,et al. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.
[83] G S Dell,et al. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.
[84] John R. Anderson. A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .
[85] R. Logie,et al. Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .
[86] A. Tversky. Features of Similarity , 1977 .
[87] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[88] Allan Collins,et al. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .
[89] Zellig S. Harris,et al. Distributional Structure , 1954 .