A UNIFIED APPROACH TO STRUCTURAL WEIGHT MINIMIZATION

Abstract It is shown that the two classical approaches to structural optimization have now reached a stage where they employ the same basic principles. Indeed, the well-known optimality criteria approach can be viewed as transforming the initial problem in a sequence of simple explicit problems in which the constraints are approximated from virtual work considerations. On the other hand, the mathematical programming approaches have progressively evoluated to a linearization method using the reciprocals of the design variables — this powerful method is proven here to be identical to a generalized optimality criteria approach. Finally, new efficient methods are proposed: (a) a hybrid optimality criterion based on first-order approximations of the most critical stress constraints and zeroth-order approximations of the others and (b) a mixed method which lies between a strict primal mathematical programming method and a pure optimality criteria (or linearization) approach. Simple numerical problems illustrate the concepts established in the paper.

[1]  Claude Fleury,et al.  Le dimensionnement automatique des structures élastiques , 1978 .

[2]  Olaf O. Storaasli,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Taylor Approximation for Structure Resizing , 1974 .

[3]  Thomas P. Kicher,et al.  Optimum Design — Minimum Weight Versus Fully Stressed , 1966 .

[4]  R. L. Barnett,et al.  High performance structures , 1968 .

[5]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Iterative Design and Structural Optimization , 1966 .

[6]  R. Karnes,et al.  The impact of automated structural optimization on actual design , 1971 .

[7]  C. Fleury,et al.  Structural Optimization by Finite Element. , 1978 .

[9]  Claude Fleury,et al.  A mixed method in structural optimization , 1978 .

[10]  L. A. Schmit,et al.  An integrated approach to structural synthesis and analysis , 1965 .

[11]  R. Fox,et al.  Constraint surface normals for structural synthesis techniques , 1965 .

[12]  C. Fleury.  Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming , 1979 .

[13]  Roman Baldur,et al.  Structural Optimization by Inscribed Hyperspheres , 1972 .

[14]  Fred Moses,et al.  Minimum weight design of structures with application to elastic grillages , 1969 .

[15]  R. A. Gellatly,et al.  Optimal Structural Design. , 1971 .

[16]  R. A. Gellatly,et al.  Application of the Created Response Surface Technique to Structural Optimization , 1968 .

[17]  M. Géradin,et al.  Optimality criteria and mathematical programming in structural weight optimization , 1978 .

[18]  V. Venkayya.  Design of optimum structures , 1971 .

[19]  Ralph L. Barnett,et al.  Minimum-Weight Design of Beams for Deflection , 1961 .

[20]  W. Lansing,et al.  Application of Fully Stressed Design Procedures to Wing and Empennage Structures , 1971 .

[21]  Lucien A. Schmit,et al.  Structural Synthesis and Design Parameter Hierarchy , 1963 .

[22]  Anthony V. Fiacco,et al.  Nonlinear programming;: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques , 1968 .

[23]  Daniel M. Brown,et al.  Structural Optimization by Nonlinear Programming , 1966 .

[24]  William Prager,et al.  Problems of Optimal Structural Design , 1968 .

[25]  L. Schmit,et al.  Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis , 1974 .

[26]  Fred Moses,et al.  Optimum Structural Design Using Linear Programming , 1964 .

[27]  Reza Razani,et al.  Behavior of fully stressed design of structures and its relationshipto minimum-weight design. , 1965 .

[28]  William Prager,et al.  Minimum-weight design of statically determinate trusses subject to multiple constraints , 1971 .

[29]  L. Schmit,et al.  Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis , 1976 .

[30]  J. C. Nagtegaal,et al.  A new approach to optimal design of elastic structures , 1973 .