REPORTING OF MANAGEMENT FORECASTS: AN EIGENVECTOR MODEL FOR ELICITATION AND REVIEW OF FORECASTS

Increasingly, business firms will be disclosing management forecasts in financial reports to investors. Single estimates based on a consensus view (e.g., Delphi estimates) may be used. It seems logical, however, to consider methods that seek formally to derive internally consistent subjective views regarding the sensitivity of assumptions and interacting events on forecasts. The major purpose of this paper is to extend micro-level cross-impact analysis to a macro-level eigenvalue analysis approach that elicits views of the effects of assumptions and interaction events on entire scenarios. Both methods are illustrated and contrasted. They are complementary rather than alternative methods. In particular, each method offers some potential in the development of operational guidelines for elicitation and reporting of management forecasts. In addition, the eigenvalue analysis offers several key advantages that make it potentially useful in preparing entire scenario forecasts.

[1]  D. Eppink,et al.  Corporate planning in the Netherlands , 1976 .

[2]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  Cross-impact gaming☆ , 1972 .

[3]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  Problems in futures research: Delphi and causal cross-impact analysis , 1977 .

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The forward and backward processes of conflict analysis , 1977 .

[5]  P. Kelly,et al.  Further comments on cross-impact analysis , 1976 .

[6]  T. L. Saaty The Sudan Transport Study , 1977 .

[7]  M. Bloom Time-dependent event cross-impact analysis: Results from a new model , 1977 .

[8]  Selwyn Enzer,et al.  Cross-impact analysis and classical probability: The question of consistency , 1978 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess , 1980 .

[10]  N. Dalkey An elementary cross-impact model , 1971 .

[11]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Assumptional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem Solving , 1979 .

[12]  J. Tydeman,et al.  Scenario generation: limitations and developments in cross-impact analysis , 1977 .

[13]  M. Godet,et al.  SMIC 74—A method for constructing and ranking scenarios ☆ ☆☆ , 1975 .

[14]  Selwyn Enzer,et al.  Cross-impact techniques in technology assessment , 1972 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Higher education in the united states (1985–2000): Scenario construction using a hierarchical framework with eigenvector weighting , 1976 .

[16]  Michel Godet,et al.  Scenarios of air transport development to 1990 by SMIC 74—A new cross-impact method , 1976 .

[17]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[18]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  A Measure of World Influence , 1976 .

[19]  Yoichi Kaya,et al.  A revised cross-impact method and its applications to the forecast of urban transportation technology , 1979 .

[20]  D. McFadden MEASUREMENT OF URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND , 1974 .

[21]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi conferencing: Computer-based conferencing with anonymity , 1971 .

[22]  J. Tydeman,et al.  Subjective Information Modelling , 1977 .

[23]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure , 1979 .

[24]  T. Gordon,et al.  Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting , 1968 .