Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Pattanittum | B. Lojanapiwat | A. Srisubat | Somkiat Potisat | Vasun Setthawong | Porjai Pattanittum
[1] A. Bosio,et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2022, European urology focus.
[2] A. Abolyosr,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency , 2021, World Journal of Urology.
[3] Abul-fotouh Ahmed,et al. Mini‐percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high‐density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial , 2021, BJU international.
[4] E. Mayo-Wilson,et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2020, BMJ.
[5] D. Sarkar,et al. Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of nonlower calyceal 10–20 mm size kidney stone , 2021, Urological Science.
[6] A. Budia,et al. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary stones smaller than 2 cm: a cost-utility analysis in the Spanish clinical setting , 2021, World Journal of Urology.
[7] T. Hermanns,et al. Effectiveness of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi of 5–15 mm: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2021, European urology open science.
[8] C. Schmoor,et al. Feasibility of an Updated Randomised Controlled Trial on Surgical Urolithiasis Treatments: The Pilot Trial for the German Endoscopic versus Shock Wave Therapy Study (GESS). , 2021, European urology focus.
[9] J. Lee,et al. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Medicina.
[10] J. Švihra,et al. Is health-related quality of life of patients after single-use flexible ureteroscopy superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A randomised prospective study , 2020, Urolithiasis.
[11] A. Yıldırım,et al. The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10–20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study , 2020, Urolithiasis.
[12] A. Bosio,et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones < 2 cm: results from a single centre randomized controlled trial , 2020 .
[13] A. El-Azab,et al. Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy the Modality of Choice versus Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a 20-30 mm Single Renal Pelvic Stone with ≤1000 Hounsfield Unit in Adults? A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. , 2020, Journal of endourology.
[14] E. Paul,et al. Shock-wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1–2 cm renal stones: A randomised pilot study , 2020 .
[15] A. Bosio,et al. PD15-07 IS FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY SUPERIOR TO ESWL IN THE TREATMENT OF 6-20 MM RENAL STONES? PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A RCT , 2020 .
[16] T. Knoll,et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones <2cm in Maximum Diameter. , 2020, The Journal of urology.
[17] Y. Tu,et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones , 2020, Medicine.
[18] P. Dahm,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults , 2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
[19] P. Dahm,et al. Alpha-blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults , 2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
[20] Liu Junbo,et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. , 2019, Urology journal.
[21] A. Yıldırım,et al. The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20mm renal stones: A prospective randomized study , 2019, European urology. Supplement.
[22] J. Lee,et al. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis , 2019, PloS one.
[23] B. Chung,et al. Changing Trends in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis in the Real World. , 2019, Journal of endourology.
[24] Y. Kohjimoto,et al. Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases , 2018, BioMed research international.
[25] Tianyu Hong,et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1–2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi , 2018, Urologia Internationalis.
[26] K. Pummer,et al. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience , 2017, World Journal of Urology.
[27] S. Chhatre,et al. Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review. , 2017, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
[28] Mohammed T Ansari,et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[29] H. Schünemann,et al. Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect , 2017, Evidence-Based Medicine.
[30] Y. Lotan,et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world , 2017, World Journal of Urology.
[31] K. Ghani,et al. Burden of Urolithiasis: Trends in Prevalence, Treatments, and Costs. , 2017, European urology focus.
[32] BadawyHesham,et al. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. , 2016 .
[33] SolimanTarek,et al. Miniperc vs Shockwave Lithotripsy for Average-Sized, Radiopaque Lower Pole Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study. , 2016 .
[34] A. Ayman,et al. PD23-06 OUTCOME OF MINI-PCNL VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN TREATMENT OF SINGLE LOWER CALYCEAL STONE 10-20MM WITH FAVORABLE LOWER CALYCEAL ANATOMY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY , 2016 .
[35] J. J. de la Rosette,et al. ‘Mini, ultra, micro’ – nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques , 2016, Therapeutic advances in urology.
[36] M. Razaghi,et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Pelvis Stones of 10-20 mm in Obese Patients. , 2015, Journal of lasers in medical sciences.
[37] N. Chaiyakunapruk,et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of various treatment procedures for lower pole renal calculi: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis , 2015, BJU international.
[38] Yinghao Sun,et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. , 2015, Journal of endourology.
[39] A. Shokeir,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20–30 mm single renal pelvic stone , 2015, Arab journal of urology.
[40] Phil Edwards,et al. The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[41] R. Ledezma,et al. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study. , 2015 .
[42] S. McClinton,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. , 2015, European urology.
[43] A. Ruffion,et al. Efficacité de l’urétéroscopie souple versus lithotritie extracorporelle dans le traitement des calculs du rein , 2015 .
[44] M. Laopaiboon,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[45] M. Das,et al. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. , 2014, Journal of endourology.
[46] A. Goel,et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes. , 2014, Urology.
[47] N. C. Şener,et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm , 2014, Urolithiasis.
[48] A. Unsal,et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones , 2013, World Journal of Urology.
[49] T. Wilt,et al. Medical Management to Prevent Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[50] A. Emran,et al. 1829 LASER LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS ESWL FOR LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONES , 2013 .
[51] R. Youssef,et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm , 2012, BJU international.
[52] P. Devereaux,et al. Emerging designs in orthopaedics: expertise-based randomized controlled trials. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[53] G. Zeng,et al. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy , 2012, Urological Research.
[54] V. Koo,et al. Cost‐effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium‐aluminium‐garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi , 2011, BJU international.
[55] G. Guyatt,et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[56] A. Modak,et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones. , 2010, Urology.
[57] E. Altinyay,et al. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi. , 2010, The Journal of urology.
[58] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. GrADe : what is “ quality of evidence ” and why is it important to clinicians ? rATING quALITY of evIDeNCe AND STreNGTH of reCommeNDATIoNS , 2022 .
[59] M. Laopaiboon,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones , 2008 .
[60] A. Bush,et al. Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics. , 2007, Urology.
[61] D. Tolley,et al. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long‐term outcome , 2007, BJU international.
[62] Min Eui Kim,et al. Comparison of the Cost and Effectiveness of Different Medical Options for Treating Lower Calyceal Stones Less than 2cm: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy , 2006 .
[63] G. Preminger. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy , 2006, Urological Research.
[64] Manoj Monga,et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[65] D. Altman,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[66] R. Clayman,et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. , 2001, The Journal of urology.
[67] L. Liou,et al. Long-term renal functional effects of shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combination therapy: a comparative study of patients with solitary kidney. , 2001, The Journal of urology.
[68] A. Trinchieri,et al. Cardiac dysrhythmias induced by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. , 1999, Journal of endourology.
[69] O. Gofrit,et al. Complete staghorn calculi: random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. , 1997, The Journal of urology.
[70] N. Mays,et al. Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi. , 1988, BMJ.
[71] C. Charig,et al. Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. , 1986, British medical journal.
[72] M. Dadfar,et al. Comparison of success rate and complications of mini PCNL with ESWL in treatment of <2cm lower pole kidney stones , 2019, International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports.
[73] A. Shaikh,et al. Comparison of outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus percutaneous lithotripsy in partial staghorn renal stone , 2019 .
[74] M. Pearle,et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[75] Harbinder Singh,et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. , 2015, The Journal of urology.
[76] O. Baş,et al. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial. , 2015, Urology.
[77] S. Çelik,et al. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease , 2014, International Urology and Nephrology.
[78] U. Nagele,et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. , 2012, European urology.
[79] M. Laopaiboon,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[80] D. Eterović,et al. A decrease in blood pressure following pyelolithotomy but not extracorporeal lithotripsy , 2004, Urological Research.
[81] V. Maker,et al. Gastrointestinal injury secondary to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a review of the literature since its inception. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[82] H. Tiselius,et al. Cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized kidney stones. A randomised clinical trial. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.