Transfer components between subjects for EEG-based emotion recognition

Addressing the structural and functional variability between subjects for robust affective brain-computer interface (aBCI) is challenging but of great importance, since the calibration phase for aBCI is time-consuming. In this paper, we propose a subject transfer framework for electroencephalogram (EEG)-based emotion recognition via component analysis. We compare two state-of-the-art subspace projecting approaches called transfer component analysis (TCA) and kernel principle component analysis (KPCA) for subject transfer. The main idea is to learn a set of transfer components underlying source domain (source subjects) and target domain (target subject). When projected to this subspace, the difference of feature distributions of both domains can be reduced. From the experiments, we show that the two proposed approaches, TCA and KPCA, can achieve an improvement on performance with the best mean accuracies of 71.80% and 79.83%, respectively, in comparison of the baseline of 58.95%. The significant improvement shows the feasibility and efficiency of our approaches for subject transfer emotion recognition from EEG signals.

[1]  Martin Buss,et al.  Feature Extraction and Selection for Emotion Recognition from EEG , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[2]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Learning a common dictionary for subject-transfer decoding with resting calibration , 2015, NeuroImage.

[3]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[4]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Investigating Critical Frequency Bands and Channels for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition with Deep Neural Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[5]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem , 2006, NIPS.

[6]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Emotional state classification from EEG data using machine learning approach , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Yifei Lu,et al.  Combining Eye Movements and EEG to Enhance Emotion Recognition , 2015, IJCAI.

[8]  Christian Kothe,et al.  Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: applying brain–computer interface technology to human–machine systems in general , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  R. Ward,et al.  EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: A survey , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  EEG-based emotion recognition during watching movies , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[11]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Emotional brain-computer interfaces , 2009, ACII.

[12]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[13]  D. O. Bos,et al.  EEG-based Emotion Recognition The Influence of Visual and Auditory Stimuli , 2007 .

[14]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  Domain Adaptation via Transfer Component Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[15]  Yuan-Pin Lin,et al.  EEG-Based Emotion Recognition in Music Listening , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Bao-Liang Lu,et al.  Differential entropy feature for EEG-based emotion classification , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[17]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[18]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2008, PloS one.

[19]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[20]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[21]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  Domain Adaptation from Multiple Sources : A Domain-Dependent Regularization Approach , 2012 .

[22]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[23]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Transferring Subspaces Between Subjects in Brain--Computer Interfacing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  A. Nijholt,et al.  A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges , 2014 .

[25]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..