Computed Tomography Image Compressibility and Limitations of Compression Ratio-Based Guidelines

Finding optimal compression levels for diagnostic imaging is not an easy task. Significant compressibility variations exist between modalities, but little is known about compressibility variations within modalities. Moreover, compressibility is affected by acquisition parameters. In this study, we evaluate the compressibility of thousands of computed tomography (CT) slices acquired with different slice thicknesses, exposures, reconstruction filters, slice collimations, and pitches. We demonstrate that exposure, slice thickness, and reconstruction filters have a significant impact on image compressibility due to an increased high frequency content and a lower acquisition signal-to-noise ratio. We also show that compression ratio is not a good fidelity measure. Therefore, guidelines based on compression ratio should ideally be replaced with other compression measures better correlated with image fidelity. Value-of-interest (VOI) transformations also affect the perception of quality. We have studied the effect of value-of-interest transformation and found significant masking of artifacts when window is widened.

[1]  B Likar,et al.  The effect of image content on detail preservation and file size reduction in lossy compression. , 2007, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[2]  April Khademi,et al.  Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Irreversible Compression Ratios (“Lossy” Compression) for Development of National Guidelines , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  Lossy Compression of Noisy Images Based on Visual Quality: A Comprehensive Study , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[4]  J A Brink,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  Kim F. Nimon,et al.  Tools to Support Interpreting Multiple Regression in the Face of Multicollinearity , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[7]  A. Manduca,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images. , 1998, Radiology.

[8]  Armando Manduca,et al.  An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images , 1997, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  W G Geraets,et al.  Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  Hosik Choi,et al.  Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  Alexander C. Flint Determining optimal medical image compression: psychometric and image distortion analysis , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[12]  Euclid Seeram Using irreversible compression in digital radiology: a preliminary study of the opinions of radiologists , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Evis Sala,et al.  Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[16]  U. Grömping Estimators of Relative Importance in Linear Regression Based on Variance Decomposition , 2007 .

[17]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Entropy-Based Distortion Measure and Bit Allocation for Wavelet Image Compression , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[19]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[21]  European Society of Radiology Usability of irreversible image compression in radiological imaging. A position paper by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) , 2011, Insights into imaging.

[22]  J. Bushberg The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2001 .

[23]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Definition of compression ratio: difference between two commercial JPEG2000 program libraries. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[24]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom◊ , 2010, Optics express.

[25]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression. , 2006, Medical physics.

[27]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.