An Example for the “Transit-Heterosis” in the Non-Return Rate of Upgraded Dairy Genotypes

The research aim of the authors was to evaluate the success of the heterosis manifested in the non-return rate regarding an upgrading breeding system in Serbia. The data base contains altogether 27,241 records of the initial purebred Simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows as well as of the six intermediate Holstein-Frisian crossed genotypes, from the last four decades (1971-2008). In the non-return rate calculated by pp day 70 and 210 the Simmentals, together with the F1-R3 genotypes, regularly reached higher values than the purebred Holsteins, together with the R4-R5 genotypes, to a significant degree (p<0.001). The heterosis appeared at dissimilar direction and extent in the non-return rate calculated by different pp days. With regards to the success of re-breeding by pp day 70, a statistically proven, positive complementary effect, which was emerging in R2, occurred in all the crossed generations. Evaluating the re-breeding by pp days 210, the recombination along with the heterosis became negative in R5 generation, while the heterosis remained positive, also favourable in all the other genotypes. The authors presented the transit-heterosis in case of R2 and R5, where the previous superiority became lost and the advantage became negative over time, respectively.

[1]  R. Miller,et al.  Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  E. Norberg,et al.  Invited review: crossbreeding in dairy cattle: a Danish perspective. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Verena Schichtl Einfluss der Kreuzung von Deutschen Holsteins und Deutschem Fleckvieh auf Milchleistung, Milchqualität und allgemeine Gesundheitsmerkmale in einem automatischen Melksystem , 2007 .

[4]  C. Dechow,et al.  Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  L. Hansen,et al.  Fertility and survival of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J. Santos,et al.  Impact of age at calving on lactation, reproduction, health, and income in first-parity Holsteins on commercial farms. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. Abdallah,et al.  Genetic parameters and trends of milk, fat, days open, and body weight after calving in North Carolina experimental herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  P. Berger,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  D. Funk,et al.  Relationship between production and days open at different levels of herd production. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  R. W. Touchberry Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: the Illinois Experiment, 1949 to 1969. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  L. D. Vanvleck,et al.  Reproductive Efficiency of Purebred and Crossbred Dairy Cattle , 1974 .

[13]  H. Norman,et al.  Trends in calving ages and calving intervals for dairy cattle breeds in the United States. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  O. Szenci,et al.  ROLE OF EARLY PREGNANCY DIAGNOSIS BY MEANS OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN IMPROVINGREPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY IN A DAIRY HERD : A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY , 1999 .

[15]  M. Guttfeld The dairy industry in Israel. , 1967 .