Wasted Density? The Impact of Toronto's Residential-Density-Distribution Policies on Public-Transit Use and Walking

Although the Toronto metropolitan region performs well relative to its North American counterparts in terms of density and public-transit use, it does not derive as much walking and public-transit patronage benefit from its high-residential-density areas as it could. The impact of residential density on journey patterns is limited by an imperfect juxtaposition of density and public-transit service peaks. Another impediment is the difficulty of associating density with other variables needed for it to translate into increased walking and public-transit modal shares. We attribute this situation to insufficient planning capacity owing in large part to generalized neighbourhood opposition to high-density residential developments and disagreement between levels of government. In this paper we both narrate events of relevance to the distribution of high residential density over the last five decades and analyze present relationships between high-density areas and journey patterns. We conclude by discussing the possibility of achieving residential-density layouts and distributions that are more conducive to walking and public-transit use than the tower-in-the-park model and the scattering of high-density pockets, both of which predominate in Toronto.

[1]  D. Levinson,et al.  Density and the Journey to Work , 1997, Growth and change.

[2]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection , 1993 .

[3]  R. Cervero MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[4]  Robert Cervero,et al.  TRANSIT-BASED HOUSING IN CALIFORNIA: EVIDENCE ON RIDERSHIP IMPACTS , 1994 .

[5]  Michael N. Bagley,et al.  The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach , 2001 .

[6]  David Banister,et al.  Sustainable Cities: Transport, Energy, and Urban Form , 1997 .

[7]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[8]  M. Bernick THE BAY AREA'S EMERGING TRANSIT-BASED HOUSING. , 1993 .

[9]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY: THE INCREMENTAL IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLANNING IDEA , 1999 .

[10]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Pretest-Posttest Strategy for Researching Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form and Travel Behavior , 2000 .

[11]  Randall Crane,et al.  The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review , 2000 .

[12]  Pierre Filion,et al.  Suburban Mixed-Use Centres and Urban Dispersion: What Difference do they Make? , 2001 .

[13]  Albert Gan,et al.  FSUTMS Mode Choice Modeling: Factors Affecting Transit Use and Access , 2002 .

[14]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey , 1989 .

[15]  Gwyndaf Williams Institutional capacity and metropolitan governance: the Greater Toronto Area , 1999 .

[16]  E. Isin Governing Toronto Without Government: Liberalism and Neoliberalism , 1998 .

[17]  B. Pushkarev,et al.  Public Transportation and Land Use Policy , 1977 .

[18]  Ruth L. Steiner,et al.  RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND TRAVEL PATTERNS: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 1994 .

[19]  P. Newman,et al.  The land use—transport connection: An overview , 1996 .

[20]  F. Frisken The Contributions of Metropolitan Government to the Success of Toronto's Public Transit System , 1991 .

[21]  J. C. Juergensmeyer American Planning Association , 2005 .

[22]  L. Bourne Private redevelopment of the central city : spatial processes of structural change in the City of Toronto , 1967 .

[23]  J. Pucher,et al.  Transit in Trouble? The Policy Challenge Posed by Canada's Changing Urban Mobility , 1995 .

[24]  R. Keil Toronto in the 1990s: Dissociated Governance? , 1998 .

[25]  Nicholas S. Compin,et al.  TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY: INCREMENTALLY IMPLEMENTING A COMPREHENSIVE IDEA , 1996 .

[26]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[27]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[28]  K. Krizek Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? , 2003 .

[29]  G. Stewart,et al.  Downtown population growth and commuting trips - recent experience in Toronto , 1991 .

[30]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[31]  L. Bourne,et al.  Self-Fulfilling Prophecies?: Decentralization, Inner City Decline, and the Quality of Urban Life , 1992 .

[32]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[33]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis , 2002 .

[34]  T. Bunting,et al.  Canada-U.S. Metropolitan Density Patterns: Zonal Convergence and Divergence1 , 2004 .

[35]  P. Waddell,et al.  Analysis of Lifestyle Choices: Neighborhood Type, Travel Patterns, and Activity Participation , 2002 .

[36]  L. Bourne The Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography Recycling Urban Systems and Metropolitan Areas: A Geographical Agenda for the 1990s and beyond , 1991 .