Application of Image Compression Ratio Analysis as a Method for Quantifying Complexity of Dental Enamel Microstructure

It is well recognized that enamel microanatomy in mammals reflects biomechanical demands placed upon teeth, as determined by mechanical properties of species' diets, use of teeth as weapons, and so forth. However, there are limited options for researchers wishing to perform large‐scale comparisons of enamel microstructure with adaptive questions in mind. This is because to date there has been no efficient method for quantification and statistical analysis of enamel complexity. Our study proposes to apply a method previously developed for quantification of 3D tooth cusp morphology to the problem of quantifying microstructural enamel complexity. Here, we use image compression ratio (ICR) as a proxy variable for enamel complexity in 2D enamel photomicrographs taken using circularly polarized transmitted light microscopy. ICR describes the relationship between a digital image captured in an uncompressed file format and the identical image that has had its file size compressed using computer algorithms; more complex images receive less compression. In our analyses, ICR analysis is able to distinguish between images of teeth with simple, radial enamel and teeth with complex decussating enamel. Moreover, our results show a significant correlation between ICR and enamel complexity ranks assigned via visual assessment. Therefore, our results demonstrate that ICR analysis provides a viable methodology for efficient comparison of overall enamel complexity among dental samples. Anat Rec, 302:2279–2286, 2019. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy

[1]  M. Ferretti Structure and evolution of mammoth molar enamel , 2003 .

[2]  S. Risnes Growth tracks in dental enamel. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[3]  Russell T Hogg,et al.  The functional morphology of the anterior masticatory apparatus in tree‐gouging marmosets (cebidae, primates) , 2011, Journal of morphology.

[4]  Alan Boyde,et al.  Circularly polarized light standards for investigations of collagen fiber orientation in bone. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[5]  J. Rensberger Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth: Pathways to functional differentiation in mammalian enamel , 2000 .

[6]  S. Herring,et al.  Enamel microstructure and microstrain in the fracture of human and pig molar cusps. , 2004, Archives of oral biology.

[7]  Paul J. Constantino,et al.  Sea otter dental enamel is highly resistant to chipping due to its microstructure , 2014, Biology Letters.

[8]  Lawrence B. Martin,et al.  Enamel thickness and microstructure in pitheciin primates, with comments on dietary adaptations of the middle Miocene hominoid Kenyapithecus. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[9]  Mikael Fortelius,et al.  High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents , 2007, Nature.

[10]  Dwayne Arola,et al.  Role of prism decussation on fatigue crack growth and fracture of human enamel. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Theodore George Rochow,et al.  Copyright: Second Edition , 2013 .

[12]  L. T. Nash,et al.  The Evolution of Exudativory in Primates , 2011, Folia Primatologica.

[13]  Russell T Hogg,et al.  Exudativory and Primate Skull Form , 2010 .

[14]  Iain R Spears,et al.  Enamel microstructure--a truly three-dimensional structure. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[15]  Paul J. Constantino,et al.  Dental enamel as a dietary indicator in mammals. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[16]  John Tomes,et al.  XXVIII. On the structure of the dental tissues of the order rodentia , 1850, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[17]  E. Dumont,et al.  Built to last: The structure, function, and evolution of primate dental enamel , 1999 .

[18]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[19]  J. Thewissen,et al.  Enamel microstructure of Pakicetus (Mammalia: Archaeoceti) , 1995, Journal of Paleontology.

[20]  J. Mckenzie,et al.  Light and Electron Microscopy: Elizabeth M. Slayter & Henry S. Slayter; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1992; 312pp.; GBP 35.00 and $64.95 (Hardback), GBP 14.95 and $ 27.95 (Paperback); ISBN 0-521-32714-8 (Hardback), 0-521-33948-0 (Paperback) , 1993 .

[21]  W. Koenigswald,et al.  Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity , 1987, Nature.