Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the image quality at different tube potential (kV) settings using anteroposterior lumbar spine radiography as a model. An Alderson phantom was used with a flat-panel detector. The tube potential varied between 48 and 125 kV while the tube charge (mAs) was adjusted to keep an effective dose of 0.11 mSv. Image quality was assessed with a visual grading analysis and with a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom together with a computer program. The VGA showed inferior image quality for the higher kV settings, > or =96 kVwith similar results for the contrast-detail phantom. When keeping the effective dose fixed, it seems beneficial to reduce kV to get the best image quality despite the fact that the mAs is not as high as with automatic exposure. However, this cannot be done with automatic exposure, which is set for a constant detector dose.

[1]  E. Vañó,et al.  Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Markus Völk,et al.  Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature , 2004, European Radiology.

[3]  R. F. Bury,et al.  Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography , 2001, European Radiology.

[4]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations , 1997 .

[5]  B Geiger,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Håkan Geijer,et al.  A Clinical Evaluation of the Image Quality Computer Program, CoCIQ , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[8]  D R Dance,et al.  A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  D R Dance,et al.  Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  M Zankl,et al.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  L. G. Månsson.  Methods for the Evaluation of Image Quality: A Review , 2000 .

[12]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Brennan,et al.  Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool? , 2003, European Radiology.