Instantaneous EEG coherence analysis during the Stroop task

Objective: In the present study the Stroop effect is analyzed by means of EEG coherence analysis in addition to traditional analysis of behavioral data (reaction time) and ERP analysis. Data from 10 normal subjects are examined. Methods: In particular, a special dynamic approach for a continuous coherence estimation is applied to investigate the procedural evolution of functional cortical relationships during the Stroop task. Results: The frequency band of 13±20 Hz is found to be sensitive to the discrimination between the congruent and the incongruent task conditions on the basis of instantaneous coherence analysis. The magnitude of coherence values within the time interval of late potentials and the maximal coherence values are used to assess the strength of interaction between distinct areas of the cortex. Higher coherences are observed within the left frontal and left parietal areas, as well as between them for the incongruent situation in comparison with the congruent situation. Furthermore, the time-points of maximal coherence allows a procedural discrimination between both situations. The peak synchrony described by the time-points of maximal coherence correlates strongly with the reaction times mainly within the frontal area and between fronto-parietal areas in the incongruent case, whereas this correlation is restricted to the right hemisphere in the congruent case. q 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. Morton,et al.  Categories of interference: verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[2]  H Egeth,et al.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Stimulus encoding and memory. , 1972 .

[4]  S. Keele.  Attention demands of memory retrieval. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  P H Seymour,et al.  Stroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages in a sentence-picture comparison task , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[6]  B. Hjorth.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[8]  P H Seymour,et al.  Conceptual Encoding and Locus of the Stroop Effect , 1977, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  G R Marsh,et al.  Changes in event related potentials during processing of Stroop stimuli. , 1979, The International journal of neuroscience.

[10]  E. J. Hannan,et al.  Multivariate linear time series models , 1984, Advances in Applied Probability.

[11]  Olivier Bertrand,et al.  Scalp Current Density Mapping: Value and Estimation from Potential Data , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  G Fein,et al.  Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  H Petsche,et al.  [The EEG and thinking]. , 1990, EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete.

[15]  G Fein,et al.  Artifactually high coherences result from using spherical spline computation of scalp current density. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Event-related potentials in a lexical stroop task. , 1991, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Karl Bättig,et al.  Action profiles of smoking and caffeine: Stroop effect, EEG, and peripheral physiology , 1992, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[18]  F. Perrin,et al.  Comments on article by Biggins et al. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  A Heathcote,et al.  Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  G. Fein,et al.  Spline computation of scalp current density and coherence: a reply to Perrin , 1992 .

[22]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[23]  R. Pascual-Marqui.  The spherical spline Laplacian does not produce artifactually high coherences: comments on two articles by Biggins et al. , 1993, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Nunez,et al.  High-resolution EEG using spline generated surface Laplacians on spherical and ellipsoidal surfaces , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  H Petsche,et al.  Brain electrical mechanisms of bilingual speech management: an initial investigation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  J. E. McDonald,et al.  Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Porto Carras,et al.  Approaches to verbal, visual and musical creativity by EEG coherence analysis , 1994 .

[30]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  T. Lagerlund,et al.  Interelectrode coherences from nearest-neighbor and spherical harmonic expansion computation of laplacian of scalp potential. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Habituation of auditory N100 correlates with amygdaloid volumes and frontal functions in age-associated memory impairment , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[33]  Jurgen Lauter,et al.  Exact t and F Tests for Analyzing Studies with Multiple Endpoints , 1996 .

[34]  Jürgen Läuter,et al.  New multivariate tests for data with an inherent structure , 1996 .

[35]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  F. W. Black,et al.  Barbiturate Anticonvulsants: A Neuropsychological and Quantitative Electroencephalographic Study , 1997, Journal of child neurology.

[37]  R. West,et al.  Stroop color-word interference and electroencephalogram activation: evidence for age-related decline of the anterior attention system. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[38]  H. Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  B Schack,et al.  Concept activation and coordination of activation procedure require two different networks , 1998, Neuroreport.

[40]  B Schack,et al.  The sensitivity of instantaneous coherence for considering elementary comparison processing. Part II: Similarities and differences between EEG and MEG coherences. , 1999, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  B Schack,et al.  The sensitivity of instantaneous coherence for considering elementary comparison processing. Part I: The relationship between mental activities and instantaneous EEG coherence. , 1999, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[42]  Bärbel Schack,et al.  Dynamic Topographic Spectral Analysis of Cognitive Processes , 1999 .