Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials with capacity selection and congestion

The current literature in the rail–truck intermodal transportation of hazardous materials (hazmat) domain ignores congestion at intermodal yards. We attempt to close that gap by proposing a bi-objective optimization framework for managing hazmat freight that not only considers congestion at intermodal yards, but also determines the appropriate equipment capacity. The proposed framework, i.e., a non-linear MIP and a multi-objective genetic algorithm based solution methodology, is applied to a realistic size problem instance from existing literature. Our analysis indicates that terminal congestion risk is a significant portion of the network risk; and, that policies and tools involving number of cranes, shorter maximum waiting times, and tighter delivery times could have a positive bearing on risk.

[1]  Samir Elhedhli,et al.  A Lagrangean Heuristic for Hub-and-Spoke System Design with Capacity Selection and Congestion , 2010, INFORMS J. Comput..

[2]  Sampath Rajagopalan,et al.  Capacity planning with congestion effects , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Rafay Ishfaq,et al.  Design of intermodal logistics networks with hub delays , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Modeling of Transport Risk for Hazardous Materials , 1998, Oper. Res..

[5]  Azedine Boulmakoul,et al.  Advanced Technologies and Methodologies for Risk Management in the Global Transport of Dangerous Goods , 2008 .

[6]  Vladimir Marianov,et al.  Location–Allocation of Multiple-Server Service Centers with Constrained Queues or Waiting Times , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Vedat Verter,et al.  A lead-time based approach for planning rail-truck intermodal transportation of dangerous goods , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Giuseppe Maschio,et al.  Risk management of road and rail transport of hazardous materials in Sicily , 2006 .

[9]  Rajan Batta,et al.  Optimal Obnoxious Paths on a Network: Transportation of Hazardous Materials , 1988, Oper. Res..

[10]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  Simultaneous Siting and Routing in the Disposal of Hazardous Wastes , 1991, Transp. Sci..

[12]  Vedat Verter,et al.  A bi-objective model for planning and managing rail-truck intermodal transportation of hazardous materials , 2012 .

[13]  Wpm Wim Nuijten,et al.  Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Wei Lu,et al.  A multimodal location and routing model for hazardous materials transportation. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Linda K. Nozick,et al.  A model for medium-term operations planning in an intermodal rail-truck service , 1997 .

[16]  E. K. Morlok,et al.  Approaches to improving drayage in rail-truck intermodal service , 1995, Pacific Rim TransTech Conference. 1995 Pacific Rim TransTech Conference Proceedings. A Ride into the Future.

[17]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  Optimization in operations research , 1997 .

[18]  Vedat Verter,et al.  A BI-OBJECTIVE MODEL FOR RAIL-TRUCK INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS , 2008 .

[19]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[20]  S. Arya Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion , 1998 .

[21]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Barbara Mazzarotta Risk reduction when transporting dangerous goods: road or rail? , 2002 .

[23]  James C Barton,et al.  Developing a Proposal for a Multi-User Intermodal Freight Terminal as a Public-Private Partnership: Lessons Learned About Public and Private Perspectives, Timing, and Roles , 1999 .