Nonequilibrium phase diagrams for actomyosin networks.

Living cells dynamically modulate the local morphologies of their actin networks to perform biological functions, including force transduction, intracellular transport, and cell division. A major challenge is to understand how diverse structures of the actin cytoskeleton are assembled from a limited set of molecular building blocks. Here we study the spontaneous self-assembly of a minimal model of cytoskeletal materials, consisting of semiflexible actin filaments, crosslinkers, and molecular motors. Using coarse-grained simulations, we demonstrate that by changing concentrations and kinetics of crosslinkers and motors, as well as filament lengths, we can generate three distinct structural phases of actomyosin assemblies: bundled, polarity-sorted, and contracted. We introduce new metrics to distinguish these structural phases and demonstrate their functional roles. We find that the binding kinetics of motors and crosslinkers can be tuned to optimize contractile force generation, motor transport, and mechanical response. By quantitatively characterizing the relationships between the modes of cytoskeletal self-assembly, the resulting structures, and their functional consequences, our work suggests new principles for the design of active materials.

[1]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Interplay of active processes modulates tension and drives phase transition in self-renewing, motor-driven cytoskeletal networks , 2016, Nature Communications.

[2]  L. Blanchoin,et al.  The myosin passenger protein Smy1 controls actin cable structure and dynamics by acting as a formin damper. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[3]  A. Bausch,et al.  Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[4]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state , 2013, Nature Physics.

[5]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Measurement of the persistence length of polymerized actin using fluorescence microscopy. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Instabilities and oscillations in isotropic active gels , 2010, 1006.1445.

[7]  Margaret L. Gardel,et al.  Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  R. Rock,et al.  Unconventional myosin traffic in cells reveals a selective actin cytoskeleton , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Broedersz,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity of stiff biopolymers connected by flexible linkers. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  G. Salbreux,et al.  Role of Turnover in Active Stress Generation in a Filament Network. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[11]  A C Maggs,et al.  Dynamic concentration of motors in microtubule arrays. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  S. Leibler,et al.  Physical Properties Determining Self-Organization of Motors and Microtubules , 2001, Science.

[13]  L Mahadevan,et al.  A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Margaret L. Gardel,et al.  Filament turnover tunes both force generation and dissipation to control long-range flows in a model actomyosin cortex , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[16]  David G. Drubin,et al.  Building Distinct Actin Filament Networks in a Common Cytoplasm , 2011, Current Biology.

[17]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  P. Jelenkovic,et al.  Design Principles of Length Control of Cytoskeletal Structures. , 2016, Annual review of biophysics.

[19]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Robust pore size analysis of filamentous networks from three-dimensional confocal microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[20]  A. Kuznetsov,et al.  Intracellular transport of insulin granules is a subordinated random walk , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  M. Gardel,et al.  F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Patrick W. Oakes,et al.  Disordered actomyosin networks are sufficient to produce cooperative and telescopic contractility , 2016, Nature Communications.

[23]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Morphological Transformation and Force Generation of Active Cytoskeletal Networks , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Martin Lenz,et al.  Contractile units in disordered actomyosin bundles arise from F-actin buckling. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[25]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Equilibrium phase diagram of semi-flexible polymer networks with linkers , 2013 .

[26]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  D. Boal Mechanics of the Cell: Membranes , 2012 .

[28]  F. Nédélec,et al.  Collective Langevin dynamics of flexible cytoskeletal fibers , 2007, 0903.5178.

[29]  Margaret L. Gardel,et al.  Actomyosin sliding is attenuated in contractile biomimetic cortices , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[30]  M. Betterton,et al.  Microscopic origins of anisotropic active stress in motor-driven nematic liquid crystals. , 2016, Soft matter.

[31]  N. Levernier,et al.  The dynamics of filament assembly define cytoskeletal network morphology , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Justin E. Molloy,et al.  Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[35]  M. Leptin,et al.  A theory that predicts behaviors of disordered cytoskeletal networks , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[37]  G. Charras,et al.  Actin kinetics shapes cortical network structure and mechanics , 2016, Science Advances.

[38]  A. Bausch,et al.  Structure formation in active networks. , 2011, Nature materials.

[39]  Daniel T. N. Chen,et al.  Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter , 2012, Nature.

[40]  J. Tinevez,et al.  Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow , 2011, Nature.

[41]  S. Leibler,et al.  Self-organization of microtubules and motors , 1997, Nature.

[42]  M. Gardel,et al.  Requirements for contractility in disordered cytoskeletal bundles , 2011, New journal of physics.

[43]  S. Edwards,et al.  The computer study of transport processes under extreme conditions , 1972 .

[44]  Michael F Hagan,et al.  Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics. , 2015, Nature materials.

[45]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Competition of two distinct actin networks for actin defines a bistable switch for cell polarization , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[46]  M. C. Marchetti,et al.  Mechanical response of active gels , 2008, 0807.3031.

[47]  Konstantin Popov,et al.  MEDYAN: Mechanochemical Simulations of Contraction and Polarity Alignment in Actomyosin Networks , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  F. Nédélec,et al.  Architecture and Connectivity Govern Actin Network Contractility , 2016, Current Biology.

[49]  M. Gardel,et al.  Filament rigidity and connectivity tune the deformation modes of active biopolymer networks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Aaron R. Dinner,et al.  Distribution of directional change as a signature of complex dynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  C. Broedersz,et al.  Fiber networks amplify active stress , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Fred C. MacKintosh,et al.  Active multistage coarsening of actin networks driven by myosin motors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Turning statistical physics models into materials design engines , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Aaron R Dinner,et al.  A Versatile Framework for Simulating the Dynamic Mechanical Structure of Cytoskeletal Networks. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[55]  J. Priess,et al.  Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[56]  François Nédélec,et al.  Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[57]  F C MacKintosh,et al.  Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[58]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[59]  F. Nédélec,et al.  Effects of Confinement on the Self-Organization of Microtubules and Motors , 2009, Current Biology.

[60]  Mark E. Schneider,et al.  When size matters: the dynamic regulation of stereocilia lengths. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[61]  J. Joanny,et al.  Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[62]  Suriyanarayanan Vaikuntanathan,et al.  Liquid behavior of cross-linked actin bundles , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  D. Boal,et al.  Mechanics of the cell , 2001 .

[64]  Gaëlle Letort,et al.  Geometrical and Mechanical Properties Control Actin Filament Organization , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  C. Santangelo,et al.  Contractility in an extensile system. , 2017, Soft matter.