Characterizing the Accuracy of a Self-Synchronized Reverse-GPS Wildlife Localization System

We characterize the accuracy of a wildlife localization system that is based on the reverse-GPS or time-of-arrival (TOA) principle, in which radio receivers at known locations collaborate to determine the location of a transmitter attached to a wild animal. We describe the system in detail and show that it produces accurate location estimates in real settings and over long periods of time. Localization errors of wild animals carrying our transmitters have standard deviation of about 5m and mean of 5-15m. If we restrict the system to operate in the center of the receiver's band-pass filters, the mean error drops to about 5m. We also show how to reliably quantify the error in each individual location estimate. In addition to the characterization of accuracy, we introduce three technical innovations in the system. First, a method to model the error of individual time-of- arrival measurements, enabling correct weighing of the data to estimate locations and allowing estimation of the covariance matrix of each location estimate. Second, extensive use of known- position beacon transmitters, to synchronize the clocks of receivers (radio-frequency TOA localization require accurate clocks), to characterize and continuously monitor the performance of the system, and to model arrival- time-estimation errors. Third, we estimate the covariance matrix of each localization.

[1]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[2]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  Martin Čížek,et al.  The BAARA (Biological AutomAted RAdiotracking) System: A New Approach in Ecological Field Studies , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Don Torrieri,et al.  Statistical Theory of Passive Location Systems , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  J. J. Moré,et al.  Levenberg--Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory , 1977 .

[6]  Sivan Toledo Evaluating batteries for advanced wildlife telemetry tags , 2015, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..

[7]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  G. Strang,et al.  Linear Algebra, Geodesy, and GPS , 1997 .

[9]  T. Zohary,et al.  Lakes Hula and Agmon: destruction and creation of wetland ecosystems in northern Israel , 1998, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[10]  Michael A. Lombardi,et al.  The Use of GPS Disciplined Oscillators as Primary Frequency Standards for Calibration and Metrology Laboratories , 2008 .

[11]  Sivan Toledo,et al.  Lightweight low-cost wildlife tracking tags using integrated transceivers , 2014, 2014 6th European Embedded Design in Education and Research Conference (EDERC).

[12]  Rajesh K. Gupta,et al.  Path Planning of Data Mules in Sensor Networks , 2011, TOSN.

[13]  Robert MacCurdy,et al.  Automatic Animal Tracking Using Matched Filters and Time Difference of Arrival , 2009, J. Commun..

[14]  A. Markham,et al.  EcoLocate: A heterogeneous wireless network system for wildlife tracking , 2008 .

[15]  Agathoniki Trigoni,et al.  Revealing the hidden lives of underground animals using magneto-inductive tracking , 2010, SenSys '10.

[16]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  VoxNet: An Interactive, Rapidly-Deployable Acoustic Monitoring Platform , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ipsn 2008).

[17]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[18]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  WILDSENSING , 2012, ACM Trans. Sens. Networks.

[19]  Paul Denys,et al.  Lightweight GPS-Tags, One Giant Leap for Wildlife Tracking? An Assessment Approach , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  Tony Fountain,et al.  Tracking Animal Location and Activity with an Automated Radio Telemetry System in a Tropical Rainforest , 2011, Comput. J..