Are unnecessary follow-up procedures induced by computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography? Comparison of mammographic diagnosis with and without use of CAD.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rate of unnecessary follow-up procedures recommended by radiologists using a CAD-system. MATERIALS AND METHODS 185 patients (740 images) were consecutively selected from three groups (36 histologically proven cancers = group 1; 49 histologically proven benign lesions = group 2 and 100 screening cases (4 years-follow up = group 3). Mammograms were evaluated by a CAD system (Second Look, CADx, Canada). Five blinded radiologists assessed the images without/with CAD outputs. Diagnostic decisions were ranked from surely benign to surely malignant according to BIRADS classification, follow-up procedures were recommended for each observed lesion (a, screening; b, short interval follow-up examination in 6 months; c, pathologic clarification). RESULTS CAD-system detected 32/36 cancers (88.9%) (FP-rate: 1.04 massmarks and 0.27 calcmarks/image). The following values were reached by all observers without/with CAD in the mean: Sensitivity 80.6/80.0%, specificity 83.2/86.4%, PPV 53.1/58.1%, and NPV 94.6/94.7%. Observers described a similar number of additional lesions without/with the use of CAD (325/326). Whereas the number of unnecessary short-time follow up recommendations increased in all case-subgroups with CAD: 40.8/42.9% (group 1), 35.6/38.1% (group 2), 44.7/46.8% (group 3), respectively, the number of recommended biopsies decreased in all subgroups: group 1: 34.7/27.1%; group 2: 47.4/41.5%, group 3: 33.3/22.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION In this rather small population additional usage of CAD led to a lower rate of unnecessary biopsies. The observed decrease of recommended unnecessary biopsies due to the usage of CAD in the screening group suggests a potential financial benefit by using CAD as diagnostic aid.

[1]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system , 2001, European Radiology.

[2]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Mammography , 2000 .

[3]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  M. Reiser,et al.  Computerassistierte Analyse von Mammographien in der klinischen Routinediagnostik , 1998, Der Radiologe.

[5]  G Wolf,et al.  [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography: the R2 ImageChecker System in detection of spiculated lesions]. , 1998, Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift.

[6]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  N Ibrahim,et al.  Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: CAD system application to MIAS database , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  F. Winsberg,et al.  Detection of Radiographic Abnormalities in Mammograms by Means of Optical Scanning and Computer Analysis , 1967 .

[9]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[10]  Emily White,et al.  Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R. Anderson,et al.  Use of electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of sonographically suspicious and highly suspicious lymph nodes of the head–neck region , 2002, European Radiology.

[12]  K Doi,et al.  Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. , 1994, Medical physics.

[13]  A. Kavanagh,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer incidence: is the increase due entirely to mammographic screening? , 1999, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  I. Olivotto,et al.  Ten years of breast screening in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia, 1988–97 , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[15]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[16]  R. Bird.  Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. , 1990, Radiology.

[17]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[18]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[19]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.

[20]  M J Schell,et al.  Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  G. Wolf,et al.  Evaluierung eines computerassistierten Diagnosesystems in der Erkennung des Mammakarzinoms , 2001 .

[22]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digitized mammograms: a robustness experiment. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[23]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.