A New Hybrid Decision Making Framework for Prioritising Port Performance Improvement Strategies

ABSTRACT This study aims to propose a conceptual decision making framework for prioritising port performance improvement strategies. It can be achieved by the concepts of benchmarking-best practices using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) incorporating a fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) method. The leading performer (i.e. Busan New Port) and the poor performer (i.e. Busan North Port) are analysed as real cases to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology. The findings from the case study reveal that the terminal operating company (TOC) 2 represents a strong desire to choose the given strategies to improve its performance, followed by TOC3, while TOC1 has the least intention to adopt the given strategies. Amongst the 30 strategies of a benefit feature, optimisation of yard stacking planning (S4) is ascertained as the most crucial one to be implemented, followed by optimisation of berth to yard operations (S27) and optimising crane availability (S2). On the other hand, the formal training/education programmes from external professionals (S7) is identified as the most useful strategy among the 8 cost items. The results yielded by the framework present the ranking of strategy options in terms of their preference to different TOCs, which enables decision makers to find optimal solutions to improve performance under their own dynamic business environments.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[2]  S. Bonsall,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and multiple criteria in vessel selection , 2009 .

[3]  Carol J. McNair,et al.  Benchmarking : A Tool for Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[4]  Da Ruan,et al.  Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  A. Rizzi,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services , 2006 .

[7]  Kap Hwan Kim,et al.  Container terminals and terminal operations , 2006, OR Spectr..

[8]  Tsz Leung Yip,et al.  Joint planning for yard storage space and home berths in container terminals , 2013 .

[9]  Z. Irani,et al.  Total quality management and corporate culture: constructs of organisational excellence , 2004 .

[10]  E. Parry,et al.  The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms , 2008 .

[11]  Peter Rousseeuw,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Seaports , 2000 .

[12]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures , 2002 .

[13]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach , 1999 .

[14]  Zaili Yang,et al.  Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency , 2017 .

[15]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Fourth generation ports – a question of agility? , 2003 .

[16]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  Determining What to Benchmark: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach , 1994 .

[17]  Chung Yu,et al.  A STUDY ON INTEGRATED PORT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF BALANCED SCORECARD , 2003 .

[18]  Jin Wang,et al.  Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Evangelos Psomas,et al.  Quality systems and competitive performance of food companies , 2013 .

[20]  B. M. Pulat,et al.  Process Improvements through Benchmarking , 1994 .

[21]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Measuring port effectiveness in user service delivery: What really determines users' evaluations of port service delivery? , 2013 .

[22]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[23]  Melanie Older Gray,et al.  The use and effectiveness of benchmarking in SMEs , 2001 .

[24]  R C Camp,et al.  Learning from the best leads to superior performance. , 1992, The Journal of business strategy.

[25]  Chandra Lalwani,et al.  Port‐centric logistics , 2008 .

[26]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Port integration in global supply chains: measures and implications for maritime logistics , 2009 .

[27]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments , 2011 .

[30]  D. Elmuti,et al.  An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage , 1997 .

[31]  Gi-Tae Yeo,et al.  Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China , 2008 .

[32]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.