BackgroundIt is difficult to systematically search for literature relevant to palliative care in general medical journals. A previously developed search filter for use on OVID Medline validated using a gold standard set of references identified through hand searching, achieved an unacceptably low sensitivity (45.4%). Retrieving relevant literature is integral to support evidence based practice, and understanding the nature of the incorrectly excluded citations (false negatives) using the filter may lead to improvement in the filter's performance.MethodsThe objectives were to describe the nature of subjects reflected in the false negative citations and to empirically improve the sensitivity of the search filter. A thematic analysis of MeSH terms by three independent reviewers was used to describe the subject coverage of the missed records. Using a frequency analysis of MeSH terms, those headings which could individually contribute at least 2.5% to sensitivity (occurring 19 or more times) were added to the search filter. All previously run searches were rerun at the same time as the revised filter, and results compared.ResultsThematic analysis of MeSH terms identified thirteen themes reflected in the missing records, none of them intrinsically palliative. The addition of six MeSH terms to the existing search filter (physician-patient relations, prognosis, quality of life, survival rate, treatment outcome and attitude to health) led to an increase in sensitivity from 46.3% to 64.7%, offset by a decrease in precision from 72.6% to 21.9%.ConclusionThe filter's sensitivity was successfully increased using frequency analysis of MeSH terms, offset by a decrease in precision. A thematic analysis of MeSH terms for the false negative citations confirmed the absence of any intrinsically palliative theme or term, suggesting that future improvements to search filters for palliative care literature will first depend on better identifying how clinicians and researchers conceptualise palliative care. It is suggested that a constellation of parameters: stage of disease (advanced or active), prospect of cure (little or none), and treatment goals (primarily quality of life) may ultimately inform search strategies. This may be similarly true for chronic diseases, which share the inherent passage of time which marks them apart from acute, and therefore more readily identifiable, episodes of care.
[1]
Robert Gordon,et al.
An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study
,
2004,
Palliative medicine.
[2]
S. Golder,et al.
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth.
,
2000,
Health technology assessment.
[3]
Irene J. Higginson,et al.
Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: Research Evidence
,
2004
.
[4]
Amy P Abernethy,et al.
Development of a subject search filter to find information relevant to palliative care in the general medical literature.
,
2006,
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[5]
Cindy Farquhar,et al.
3 The Cochrane Library
,
1996
.
[6]
R. Brian Haynes,et al.
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE.
,
1994,
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.
[7]
A J Sutton,et al.
Publication and related biases.
,
2000,
Health technology assessment.
[8]
Alex J. Sutton,et al.
Publication and related biases: a review
,
2000
.
[9]
Michelle Jenkins,et al.
Evaluation of methodological search filters--a review.
,
2004,
Health information and libraries journal.
[10]
Amy P Abernethy,et al.
CareSearch: finding and evaluating Australia's missing palliative care literature
,
2005,
BMC palliative care.