Correspondence Mapping Induced State and Action Metrics for Robotic Imitation

This paper addresses the problem of body mapping in robotic imitation where the demonstrator and imitator may not share the same embodiment [degrees of freedom (DOFs), body morphology, constraints, affordances, and so on]. Body mappings are formalized using a unified (linear) approach via correspondence matrices, which allow one to capture partial, mirror symmetric, one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many associations between various DOFs across dissimilar embodiments. We show how metrics for matching state and action aspects of behavior can be mathematically determined by such correspondence mappings, which may serve to guide a robotic imitator. The approach is illustrated and validated in a number of simulated 3-D robotic examples, using agents described by simple kinematic models and different types of correspondence mappings

[1]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Learning by watching: extracting reusable task knowledge from visual observation of human performance , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Mapping between dissim ilar bodies: Affordances and the algebraic foundations of imitation , 1998 .

[3]  B. Scassellati.  Imitation and mechanisms of joint attention: a developmental structure for building social skills on a humanoid robot , 1999 .

[4]  J. Nadel,et al.  The evolving nature of imitation as a format for communication. , 1999 .

[5]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv.  Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Aude Billard,et al.  LEARNING MOTOR SKILLS BY IMITATION: A BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED ROBOTIC MODEL , 2001, Cybern. Syst..

[8]  Monica N. Nicolescu,et al.  Learning and interacting in human-robot domains , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[9]  C. Breazeal,et al.  Robots that imitate humans , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  W. Prinz,et al.  Goal representations in imitative actions , 2002 .

[11]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Imitation as a Dual-Route Process Featuring Predictive and Learning Components: A Biologically Plausible Computational Model , 2002 .

[12]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Imitation with ALICE: learning to imitate corresponding actions across dissimilar embodiments , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Three sources of information in social learning , 2002 .

[14]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Vocal, Social, and Self-Imitation by Bottlenosed Dolphins , 2002 .

[15]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Generating whole body motions for a biped humanoid robot from captured human dances , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[16]  José Santos-Victor,et al.  Visual transformations in gesture imitation: what you see is what you do , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[17]  G. Butterworth.  Pointing Is the Royal Road to Language for Babies , 2003 .

[18]  Masaki Ogino,et al.  Imitation Learning Based on Visuo-Somatic Mapping , 2004, ISER.

[19]  J. Saunders,et al.  An experimental comparison of imitation paradigms used in social robotics , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[20]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Discovering optimal imitation strategies , 2004, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Towards robot cultures?: Learning to imitate in a robotic arm test-bed with dissimilarly embodied agents , 2004 .

[22]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  A Correspondence Metric for Imitation , 2004, AAAI.

[23]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Achieving Corresponding Effects on Multiple Robotic Platforms: Imitating in Context Using Different Effect Metrics , 2005 .

[24]  Estela Bicho,et al.  Action Understanding and Imitation Learning in a Robot-Human Task , 2005, ICANN.