A system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care.

The availability of psychometrically sound and clinically relevant screening, diagnosis, and outcome evaluation tools is essential to high-quality palliative care assessment and management. Such data will enable us to improve patient evaluations, prognoses, and treatment selections, and to increase patient satisfaction and quality of life. To accomplish these goals, medical care needs more precise, efficient, and comprehensive tools for data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and management. We describe a system for interactive assessment and management in palliative care (SIAM-PC), which is patient centered, model driven, database derived, evidence based, and technology assisted. The SIAM-PC is designed to reliably measure the multiple dimensions of patients' needs for palliative care, and then to provide information to clinicians, patients, and the patients' families to achieve optimal patient care, while improving our capacity for doing palliative care research. This system is innovative in its application of the state-of-the-science approaches, such as item response theory and computerized adaptive testing, to many of the significant clinical problems related to palliative care.

[1]  N M Laird,et al.  Analysing incomplete longitudinal binary responses: a likelihood-based approach. , 1994, Biometrics.

[2]  D. Cella,et al.  Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: A Discussion of Item Response Theory and Its Applications in Health Status Assessment , 2000, Medical care.

[3]  David Clark,et al.  The changing model of palliative care , 2008 .

[4]  C. V. von Gunten,et al.  The Academic Hospice , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  N. Christakis,et al.  The role of prognosis in clinical decision making , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  H. Wainer,et al.  Toward a Psychometrics for Testlets , 1989 .

[7]  B. Reeve,et al.  Item Response Theory and its Applications to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[8]  D. Cella,et al.  Real-time clinical application of quality-of-life assessment in advanced lung cancer. , 2002, Clinical lung cancer.

[9]  C H Brown,et al.  Protecting against nonrandomly missing data in longitudinal studies. , 1990, Biometrics.

[10]  D. Weiss Computerized Adaptive Testing for Effective and Efficient Measurement in Counseling and Education , 2004 .

[11]  A. Dowson,et al.  Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  J. Morris,et al.  The RAI-PC: An assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings , 2003, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[13]  J Bochner,et al.  A computerized adaptive testing system for speech discrimination measurement: the Speech Sound Pattern Discrimination Test. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Stephen G. Sireci,et al.  ON THE RELIABILITY OF TESTLET‐BASED TESTS , 1991 .

[15]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer , 2000 .

[16]  L H Janda,et al.  IVR Test & Survey: A computer program to collect data via computerized telephonic applications , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  William A. Sands,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. , 1997 .

[18]  T. Payne Computer decision support systems. , 2000, Chest.

[19]  D. D. Gruijter,et al.  Applications of Item Response Theory , 2007 .

[20]  Comprehensive assessment of patients in palliative care: a descriptive study utilizing the INTERMED. , 2000, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[21]  H. Wainer Computerized adaptive testing: A primer, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[22]  L. Schilder,et al.  Assessment of the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. , 1983, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[23]  Maria Fenech Adami,et al.  The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. , 2005, Nurse researcher.

[24]  H. Alpert,et al.  Concise screening questions for clinical assessments of terminal care: the needs near the end-of-life care screening tool. , 2001, Journal of palliative medicine.

[25]  B. Mount,et al.  Quality of Life in Terminal Illness: Defining and Measuring Subjective Well-Being in the Dying , 1992, Journal of palliative care.

[26]  S G Baker,et al.  Marginal regression for repeated binary data with outcome subject to non-ignorable non-response. , 1995, Biometrics.

[27]  I. Finlay,et al.  Quality of life assessment in palliative care. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[29]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice , 2000 .

[30]  Theodore W. Frick,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing in instructional settings , 1993 .