Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture

Abstract Identifying and classifying feeding behaviour in free-ranging ruminants will help improve efficiency of animal production. Another potential benefit would be in understanding the role behaviour has in determining heritability of methane measurement. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision with which tri-axial accelerometers can identify sheep behaviour at pasture. Two studies, the first over six days and the other over two days were conducted using South African Meat Merino × Merino ewes averaging 55 (±5) kg and 22 months of age, respectively. The animals were located in either a semi-improved pasture (0.3 ha) or in a small (30 m 2 ) area with access to water to observe five mutually exclusive behaviours, grazing, lying, running, standing and walking. A tri-axial accelerometer was attached to a halter on the under-jaw of each animal. Three epochs (3 s, 5 s and 10 s) with forty-four features calculated from acceleration signals were used to classify behaviours. The five most important features for each epoch were determined using random forest and the five behaviours were classified using a decision-tree algorithm to determine model accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision. The decision-tree algorithm correctly classified 90.5, 92.5 and 91.3% of the evaluation data set for grazing behaviour for the 3, 5 and 10 s epochs, respectively. There was no difference in the accuracy between the evaluation and validation data sets for grazing behaviour at each epoch. The model predicted grazing and running behaviour highly accurately and with the highest precision, sensitivity and specificity for the validation data set for the 10 s epoch. The 5 s epoch for both the evaluation and validation data sets was selected as the most suitable epoch based on the Kappa values. We successfully identified from the distribution of component populations that the natural log-transformation of the mean of X-axis accelerations for each epoch could identify grazing and non-grazing states. Therefore, this methodology will be useful in identifying sheep activity for research applications such as before methane measurement using portable accumulation chambers or other applications addressing temporal grazing patterns.

[1]  P. D. Penning,et al.  A technique to record automatically some aspects of grazing and ruminating behaviour in sheep , 1983 .

[2]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[3]  Albert Sundrum,et al.  Technical note: Evaluation of a new system for measuring feeding behavior of dairy cows , 2014 .

[4]  Greg Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Behavioral classification of data from collars containing motion sensors in grazing cattle , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[5]  David G. Renter,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle , 2009 .

[6]  J. A. Lines,et al.  A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems , 1997 .

[7]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and environmental variation in methane emissions of sheep at pasture. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Eugene D. Ungar,et al.  Classifying cattle jaw movements: Comparing IGER Behaviour Recorder and acoustic techniques , 2006 .

[9]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[10]  W. C. Ellis,et al.  Fragmentation and ruminal escape of particles as related to variations in voluntary intake, chewing behavior and extent of digestion of potentially digestible NDF in heifers. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  Kensuke Kawamura,et al.  Development of an automatic classification system for eating, ruminating and resting behavior of cattle using an accelerometer , 2008 .

[13]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Classification of behaviour in housed dairy cows using an accelerometer-based activity monitoring system , 2015, Animal Biotelemetry.

[14]  Klaus Manfred Scheibe,et al.  Application testing of a new three-dimensional acceleration measuring system with wireless data transfer (WAS) for behavior analysis , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[16]  Yukinori Tani,et al.  Automatic recognition and classification of cattle chewing activity by an acoustic monitoring method with a single-axis acceleration sensor , 2013 .

[17]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Estimates of repeatability and heritability of methane production in sheep using portable accumulation chambers , 2016 .

[18]  J. P. Holland,et al.  An automated sensor-based method of simple behavioural classification of sheep in extensive systems , 2008 .

[19]  Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  GeneSrF and varSelRF: a web-based tool and R package for gene selection and classification using random forest , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  J Dijkstra,et al.  Technical note: Evaluation of an ear-attached movement sensor to record cow feeding behavior and activity. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Transforming Agriculture through Pervasive Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[22]  J. Hancock Studies in grazing behaviour of dairy cattle: II. Bloat in relation to grazing behaviour , 1954, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Creating a behavioural classification module for acceleration data: using a captive surrogate for difficult to observe species , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  I Kyriazakis,et al.  The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.