Functionalizing the Tumor Microenvironment with Microfluidics for Anti-cancer Drug Development

Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. The complex and disorganized tumor microenvironment makes it very difficult to treat this disease. The most common in vitro drug screening method now is based on 2D culture which poorly represents actual tumors. Therefore, many 3D tumor models which are more physiologically relevant, have been developed to conduct in vitro drug screening and alleviate this situation. Among all these methods, microfluidic tumor model has the unique advantage of recapitulating tumor microenvironment in a comparatively easier and representative fashion. While there are many review papers available on the related topic of microfluidic tumor model, in this review we aim to focus more on the possibility of generating “clinically actionable information” from these microfluidic systems, besides scientific insight. Our topics cover the tumor microenvironment, conventional 2D and 3D cultures, animal model, and microfluidic tumor model, emphasizing their link to anti-cancer drug discovery and personalized medicine. We hope it can guide new researchers into this area to find their direction as well as showcase recent progress to readers of interest.

[1]  Yoshitaka J. Sei,et al.  Probing the Effect of Bioinspired Nanomaterials on Angiogenic Sprouting With a Microengineered Vascular System , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[2]  R. Jain,et al.  Reengineering the Tumor Vasculature: Improving Drug Delivery and Efficacy. , 2018, Trends in cancer.

[3]  Jaap M. J. den Toonder,et al.  Metastasis in context: modeling the tumor microenvironment with cancer-on-a-chip approaches , 2018, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[4]  Jongyoon Han,et al.  Expansion of patient-derived circulating tumor cells from liquid biopsies using a CTC microfluidic culture device , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[5]  J. R. Cressman,et al.  Microfluidic generation of physiological oxygen gradients in vitro , 2017, 2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT).

[6]  A. Barra,et al.  Organs on chip approach: a tool to evaluate cancer -immune cells interactions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  B. Prabhakarpandian,et al.  A Biomimetic Microfluidic Tumor Microenvironment Platform Mimicking the EPR Effect for Rapid Screening of Drug Delivery Systems , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Steven C George,et al.  Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Endothelial Cells for Three-Dimensional Microphysiological Systems. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[9]  P. Netti,et al.  3D tumor microtissues as an in vitro testing platform for microenvironmentally-triggered drug delivery systems. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  Stephanie L. Ham,et al.  Advanced biomaterials and microengineering technologies to recapitulate the stepwise process of cancer metastasis. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[11]  J M García-Aznar,et al.  Quantifying 3D chemotaxis in microfluidic-based chips with step gradients of collagen hydrogel concentrations. , 2017, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[12]  Lidong Qin,et al.  Bridging the gap: microfluidic devices for short and long distance cell-cell communication. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[13]  S. Sant,et al.  The production of 3D tumor spheroids for cancer drug discovery. , 2017, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[14]  D. Landis,et al.  Microfluidic Biopsy Trapping Device for the Real-Time Monitoring of Tumor Microenvironment , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Jos Jonkers,et al.  Genetically engineered mouse models in oncology research and cancer medicine , 2016, EMBO molecular medicine.

[16]  Doheon Lee,et al.  Normalization of Tumor Vessels by Tie2 Activation and Ang2 Inhibition Enhances Drug Delivery and Produces a Favorable Tumor Microenvironment. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[17]  U. Demirci,et al.  Dynamic Microenvironment Induces Phenotypic Plasticity of Esophageal Cancer Cells Under Flow , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[18]  R. Cleveland,et al.  Microvessels-on-a-Chip to Assess Targeted Ultrasound-Assisted Drug Delivery. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[19]  M. Yamada,et al.  Fabrication of multilayered vascular tissues using microfluidic agarose hydrogel platforms , 2016, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Beom-Jin Lee,et al.  Investigation of biomimetic shear stress on cellular uptake and mechanism of polystyrene nanoparticles in various cancer cell lines , 2016, Archives of Pharmacal Research.

[21]  N. Annabi,et al.  Microengineered cancer-on-a-chip platforms to study the metastatic microenvironment. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[22]  G. Turcatti,et al.  Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[23]  T. Lyden,et al.  Generation and comparative analysis of choriocarcinoma tumor organoids using a new hanging-drop culture method , 2016 .

[24]  L. Yeo,et al.  Acoustically-driven thread-based tuneable gradient generators. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[25]  Mary C. Regier,et al.  Transitions from mono- to co- to tri-culture uniquely affect gene expression in breast cancer, stromal, and immune compartments , 2016, Biomedical microdevices.

[26]  G. Devi,et al.  Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model. , 2016, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[27]  C. Lim,et al.  Liquid biopsy and therapeutic response: Circulating tumor cell cultures for evaluation of anticancer treatment , 2016, Science Advances.

[28]  Travis S. Emery,et al.  Circulatory shear flow alters the viability and proliferation of circulating colon cancer cells , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Matthew Y. H. Tang,et al.  Stemness and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells under shear stress , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Quantification of angiogenic sprouting under different growth factors in a microfluidic platform. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Y. Meng,et al.  Developing multi-cellular tumor spheroid model (MCTS) in the chitosan/collagen/alginate (CCA) fibrous scaffold for anticancer drug screening. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[32]  Brian F. Bender,et al.  Digital microfluidics for spheroid-based invasion assays. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[33]  Qi Wang,et al.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote non-small cell lung cancer cell invasion by upregulation of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) expression in an integrated bionic microfluidic device , 2016, Oncotarget.

[34]  C. Nelson,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure regulates collective invasion in engineered human breast tumors via Snail, vimentin, and E-cadherin. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[35]  S. Curley,et al.  Generation of Homogenous Three-Dimensional Pancreatic Cancer Cell Spheroids Using an Improved Hanging Drop Technique. , 2016, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[36]  C. Murphy,et al.  Recent Progress in Cancer Thermal Therapy Using Gold Nanoparticles , 2016 .

[37]  Chien-Chung Peng,et al.  Drug testing and flow cytometry analysis on a large number of uniform sized tumor spheroids using a microfluidic device , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Akif I. Ibraguimov,et al.  A review of chemical gradient systems for cell analysis. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[39]  Q. Fang,et al.  Microfluidics for cell-based high throughput screening platforms - A review. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[40]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Biomimetic channel modeling local vascular dynamics of pro-inflammatory endothelial changes. , 2016, Biomicrofluidics.

[41]  A. Mes-Masson,et al.  Micro-dissected tumor tissues on chip: an ex vivo method for drug testing and personalized therapy. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[42]  Abdel Kareem Azab,et al.  The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy , 2015, Hypoxia.

[43]  U. Demirci,et al.  Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models , 2015, Materials today.

[44]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Chemotherapy-induced antitumor immunity requires formyl peptide receptor 1 , 2015, Science.

[45]  Qionglin Liang,et al.  Investigation into the hypoxia-dependent cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs under oxygen gradient in a microfluidic device , 2015 .

[46]  Mingming Wu,et al.  Interstitial flows promote amoeboid over mesenchymal motility of breast cancer cells revealed by a three dimensional microfluidic model. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[47]  Peter T C So,et al.  Simultaneous or Sequential Orthogonal Gradient Formation in a 3D Cell Culture Microfluidic Platform. , 2015, Small.

[48]  Johan Karlsson,et al.  Review: in vitro microvessel models. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[49]  S. Thomas,et al.  Analytical cell adhesion chromatography reveals impaired persistence of metastatic cell rolling adhesion to P-selectin , 2015, Journal of Cell Science.

[50]  Peng-fei Liu,et al.  A bladder cancer microenvironment simulation system based on a microfluidic co-culture model , 2015, Oncotarget.

[51]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Identification of drugs as single agents or in combination to prevent carcinoma dissemination in a microfluidic 3D environment , 2015, Oncotarget.

[52]  Satoshi Hirakawa,et al.  Microcirculation-on-a-Chip: A Microfluidic Platform for Assaying Blood- and Lymphatic-Vessel Permeability , 2015, PloS one.

[53]  Steven C George,et al.  Microfluidic device to control interstitial flow-mediated homotypic and heterotypic cellular communication. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[54]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  A multilayered microfluidic blood vessel-like structure , 2015, Biomedical Microdevices.

[55]  D. Huh,et al.  A microengineered pathophysiological model of early-stage breast cancer. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[56]  Noo Li Jeon,et al.  Engineering of a Biomimetic Pericyte-Covered 3D Microvascular Network , 2015, PloS one.

[57]  A. Hierlemann,et al.  3D spherical microtissues and microfluidic technology for multi-tissue experiments and analysis. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[58]  Mengsu Yang,et al.  Microfluidic Platform for Studying Chemotaxis of Adhesive Cells Revealed a Gradient-Dependent Migration and Acceleration of Cancer Stem Cells. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[59]  Xuexia Lin,et al.  Oxygen-induced cell migration and on-line monitoring biomarkers modulation of cervical cancers on a microfluidic system , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[60]  T. Mukohara,et al.  Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer. , 2015, Oncology reports.

[61]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Integrins and cancer: regulators of cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[62]  H. Kuh,et al.  Improving drug delivery to solid tumors: priming the tumor microenvironment. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[63]  G. Hu,et al.  New horizons in tumor microenvironment biology: challenges and opportunities , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[64]  Zhuolin Xiang,et al.  A convection-driven long-range linear gradient generator with dynamic control. , 2015, Lab on a Chip.

[65]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[66]  J. Neimark Line of attack. , 2015, Science.

[67]  Yong Chen,et al.  3D printing of soft lithography mold for rapid production of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic devices for cell stimulation with concentration gradients , 2015, Biomedical microdevices.

[68]  Yan Li,et al.  An artificial blood vessel implanted three-dimensional microsystem for modeling transvascular migration of tumor cells. , 2015, Lab on a Chip.

[69]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Engineered in vitro disease models. , 2015, Annual review of pathology.

[70]  G. Dubini,et al.  Human 3D vascularized organotypic microfluidic assays to study breast cancer cell extravasation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  H. Kleinman,et al.  Matrigel: from discovery and ECM mimicry to assays and models for cancer research. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[72]  Elena M De-Juan-Pardo,et al.  In vitro modeling of the prostate cancer microenvironment. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[73]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Hydrogels to model 3D in vitro microenvironment of tumor vascularization. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[74]  Yuejun Kang,et al.  A microfluidic co-culture system to monitor tumor-stromal interactions on a chip. , 2014, Biomicrofluidics.

[75]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Tumour genomic and microenvironmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[76]  Dong Choon Hyun,et al.  Engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer therapy. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[77]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  A quantitative microfluidic angiogenesis screen for studying anti-angiogenic therapeutic drugs. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[78]  Matthew T. Leslie,et al.  Methods to study the tumor microenvironment under controlled oxygen conditions. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[79]  Hui Jiang,et al.  Expansion of CTCs from early stage lung cancer patients using a microfluidic co-culture model , 2014, Oncotarget.

[80]  Martin D. Brennan,et al.  Oxygen control with microfluidics. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[81]  H. Niu,et al.  Far from resolved: stromal cell-based iTRAQ research of muscle-invasive bladder cancer regarding heterogeneity. , 2014, Oncology reports.

[82]  J. Friend,et al.  In Situ Generation of Tunable Porosity Gradients in Hydrogel‐Based Scaffolds for Microfluidic Cell Culture , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[83]  Marissa Nichole Rylander,et al.  Flow shear stress regulates endothelial barrier function and expression of angiogenic factors in a 3D microfluidic tumor vascular model , 2014, Cell adhesion & migration.

[84]  Peter C Searson,et al.  Live-cell imaging of invasion and intravasation in an artificial microvessel platform. , 2014, Cancer research.

[85]  Linda G. Griffith,et al.  Human Vascular Tissue Models Formed from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Endothelial Cells , 2014, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[86]  Y. Tung,et al.  A polydimethylsiloxane-polycarbonate hybrid microfluidic device capable of generating perpendicular chemical and oxygen gradients for cell culture studies. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[87]  S. Baylin,et al.  Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[88]  Huei-Jyuan Pan,et al.  Modulating chemotaxis of lung cancer cells by using electric fields in a microfluidic device. , 2014, Biomicrofluidics.

[89]  P. Wong,et al.  A microfluidic model for organ-specific extravasation of circulating tumor cells. , 2014, Biomicrofluidics.

[90]  H. Dogus Akaydin,et al.  Three Dimensional Microfluidic Cell Arrays for ex Vivo Drug Screening with Mimicked Vascular Flow , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[91]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3D cell migration , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  M. Ghert,et al.  Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. , 2014, American journal of translational research.

[93]  Yan Li,et al.  Collagen as a double-edged sword in tumor progression , 2013, Tumor Biology.

[94]  A. Ridley,et al.  Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis , 2013, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[95]  M. Matin,et al.  Immortality of cell lines: challenges and advantages of establishment , 2013, Cell biology international.

[96]  P. Johnston,et al.  Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm , 2013, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[97]  M. Junttila,et al.  Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response , 2013, Nature.

[98]  Thomas Hankemeier,et al.  Microfluidic titer plate for stratified 3D cell culture. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[99]  A. Orimo,et al.  Carcinoma‐associated fibroblasts: Non‐neoplastic tumour‐promoting mesenchymal cells , 2013, Journal of cellular physiology.

[100]  Yu-Hsiang Hsu,et al.  A microfluidic platform for generating large-scale nearly identical human microphysiological vascularized tissue arrays. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[101]  Wenxin Wang,et al.  Application of a microfluidic chip-based 3D co-culture to test drug sensitivity for individualized treatment of lung cancer. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[102]  Wei Yin,et al.  The Identification and Characterization of Breast Cancer CTCs Competent for Brain Metastasis , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[103]  Hyunjae Lee,et al.  Engineering of functional, perfusable 3D microvascular networks on a chip. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[104]  C. Lewis,et al.  Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[105]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[106]  Y. Hida,et al.  Tumour endothelial cells acquire drug resistance in a tumour microenvironment. , 2013, Journal of biochemistry.

[107]  M. King,et al.  Computational and Experimental Models of Cancer Cell Response to Fluid Shear Stress , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[108]  Meng Sun,et al.  Generation of chemical concentration gradients in mobile droplet arrays via fragmentation of long immiscible diluting plugs. , 2013, Analytical Chemistry.

[109]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[110]  Annamaria Gerardino,et al.  Cross talk between cancer and immune cells: exploring complex dynamics in a microfluidic environment. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[111]  K. Vousden,et al.  p53 mutations in cancer , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[112]  S. Takayama,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[113]  T. Hagemann,et al.  The tumor microenvironment at a glance , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[114]  Daniel C Leslie,et al.  A Human Disease Model of Drug Toxicity–Induced Pulmonary Edema in a Lung-on-a-Chip Microdevice , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[115]  Kunwei Shen,et al.  Stromal cells in tumor microenvironment and breast cancer , 2012, Cancer Metastasis Review.

[116]  C. Swanton Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time. , 2012, Cancer research.

[117]  Yasuhiro Miki,et al.  The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment , 2012, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[118]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[119]  R. Kamm,et al.  Microfluidic assay for simultaneous culture of multiple cell types on surfaces or within hydrogels , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[120]  Mallika Singh,et al.  Genetically engineered mouse models: closing the gap between preclinical data and trial outcomes. , 2012, Cancer research.

[121]  T. Golub,et al.  Tumor microenvironment induces innate RAF-inhibitor resistance through HGF secretion , 2012, Nature.

[122]  Ulrike Haessler,et al.  Migration dynamics of breast cancer cells in a tunable 3D interstitial flow chamber. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[123]  R. Jain,et al.  Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the delivery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[124]  M. Swartz,et al.  Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: linking mechanobiology with immunity , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[125]  Z. Werb,et al.  The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[126]  Rakesh K Jain,et al.  Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[127]  M. Troester,et al.  Gene Expression Analysis of In Vitro Cocultures to Study Interactions between Breast Epithelium and Stroma , 2011, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[128]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Micro-ring structures stabilize microdroplets to enable long term spheroid culture in 384 hanging drop array plates , 2011, Biomedical Microdevices.

[129]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Tumor Metastasis: Molecular Insights and Evolving Paradigms , 2011, Cell.

[130]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Design and development of microbioreactors for long-term cell culture in controlled oxygen microenvironments , 2011, Biomedical Microdevices.

[131]  G. Coukos,et al.  The parallel lives of angiogenesis and immunosuppression: cancer and other tales , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[132]  Bjoern Rodday,et al.  Semiautomatic Growth Analysis of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[133]  Lance L. Munn,et al.  Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[134]  Tim Pohlemann,et al.  The liquid overlay technique is the key to formation of co-culture spheroids consisting of primary osteoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. , 2011, Cytotherapy.

[135]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Tumour hypoxia promotes tolerance and angiogenesis via CCL28 and Treg cells , 2011, Nature.

[136]  Lei Xu,et al.  Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[137]  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos,et al.  Delivery of molecular and nanoscale medicine to tumors: transport barriers and strategies. , 2011, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[138]  W. Wilson,et al.  Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[139]  J. Heath,et al.  A clinical microchip for evaluation of single immune cells reveals high functional heterogeneity in phenotypically similar T cells , 2011, Nature Network Boston.

[140]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis , 2011, Nature.

[141]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[142]  M. Oren,et al.  New plays in the p53 theater. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[143]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Combination of fluid and solid mechanical stresses contribute to cell death and detachment in a microfluidic alveolar model. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[144]  Josephine C. Adams,et al.  The Evolution of Extracellular Matrix , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[145]  B. Nelson,et al.  CD20+ B Cells: The Other Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[146]  Jennifer Barrila,et al.  Organotypic 3D cell culture models: using the rotating wall vessel to study host–pathogen interactions , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[147]  A. Criado Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals , 2010 .

[148]  Stephen J. Florczyk,et al.  Chitosan-alginate 3d Scaffolds as a Mimic of the Glioma Tumor Microenvironment , 2022 .

[149]  Z. N. Demou Gene Expression Profiles in 3D Tumor Analogs Indicate Compressive Strain Differentially Enhances Metastatic Potential , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[150]  Taisuke Masuda,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture device utilizing thin membrane deformation by decompression , 2010 .

[151]  Z. Werb,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinases: Regulators of the Tumor Microenvironment , 2010, Cell.

[152]  Jeffrey W. Pollard,et al.  Macrophage Diversity Enhances Tumor Progression and Metastasis , 2010, Cell.

[153]  I. Huijbers,et al.  A Role for Fibrillar Collagen Deposition and the Collagen Internalization Receptor Endo180 in Glioma Invasion , 2010, PloS one.

[154]  R. Huang,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease , 2009, Cell.

[155]  R. Hynes The Extracellular Matrix: Not Just Pretty Fibrils , 2009, Science.

[156]  Bjoern Rodday,et al.  Test System for Trifunctional Antibodies in 3D MCTS Culture , 2009, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[157]  A. Lee,et al.  Engineering microscale cellular niches for three-dimensional multicellular co-cultures. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[158]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Microfluidic Endothelium for Studying the Intravascular Adhesion of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells , 2009, PloS one.

[159]  J. Pollard,et al.  Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[160]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Why are tumour blood vessels abnormal and why is it important to know? , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[161]  P. Allavena,et al.  Cancer-related inflammation , 2008, Nature.

[162]  M. Paoloni,et al.  Translation of new cancer treatments from pet dogs to humans , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[163]  I. Tannock,et al.  Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[164]  Alan J. Man,et al.  Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[165]  Hongseok Moses Noh,et al.  Micropatterns of Matrigel for three-dimensional epithelial cultures. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[166]  Wei Liu,et al.  Tissue engineering of blood vessel , 2007, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[167]  R. Gaynor,et al.  Mechanical force modulates global gene expression and β-catenin signaling in colon cancer cells , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[168]  Genee Y. Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[169]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. , 2007, Cancer research.

[170]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion , 2006, BMC medicine.

[171]  Robert D Burke,et al.  The echinoderm adhesome. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[172]  A. Ivascu,et al.  Rapid Generation of Single-Tumor Spheroids for High-Throughput Cell Function and Toxicity Analysis , 2006, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[173]  J. Bereiter-Hahn,et al.  Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure reduces tumor cell proliferation in a xenograft tumor model. , 2006, Neoplasia.

[174]  Napoleone Ferrara,et al.  Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target , 2005, Nature.

[175]  J. Healey,et al.  Cell Proliferation of Cultured Human Cancer Cells are Affected by the Elevated Tumor Pressures that Exist In Vivo , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[176]  Dennis C. Sgroi,et al.  Stromal Fibroblasts Present in Invasive Human Breast Carcinomas Promote Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis through Elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 Secretion , 2005, Cell.

[177]  Rui Yang,et al.  Elevated Physiologic Tumor Pressure Promotes Proliferation and Chemosensitivity in Human Osteosarcoma , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[178]  S. Eccles,et al.  Targeting key steps in metastatic tumour progression. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[179]  R. Jain Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[180]  J. Block,et al.  Hypoxia induces HIF‐1α and VEGF expression in chondrosarcoma cells and chondrocytes , 2004 .

[181]  C. Lewis,et al.  Mechanisms regulating the recruitment of macrophages into hypoxic areas of tumors and other ischemic tissues. , 2004, Blood.

[182]  P. Jaakkola,et al.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) promotes its degradation by induction of HIF-alpha-prolyl-4-hydroxylases. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[183]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[184]  Olivier De Wever,et al.  Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[185]  Elissa J Chesler,et al.  Identification and ranking of genetic and laboratory environment factors influencing a behavioral trait, thermal nociception, via computational analysis of a large data archive , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[186]  Y. Hegerfeldt,et al.  Collective cell movement in primary melanoma explants: plasticity of cell-cell interaction, beta1-integrin function, and migration strategies. , 2002, Cancer research.

[187]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[188]  R. Jain,et al.  Absence of functional lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. , 2000, Cancer research.

[189]  R K Jain,et al.  Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: clinical implications. , 1999, Cancer research.

[190]  J. Risteli,et al.  Aberrant type I and type III collagen gene expression in human breast cancer in vivo , 1998, The Journal of pathology.

[191]  Paolo A. Netti,et al.  Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[192]  K. S. Narayan,et al.  Three-dimensional growth patterns of various human tumor cell lines in simulated microgravity of a NASA bioreactor , 1997, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[193]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Cell Adhesion: The Molecular Basis of Tissue Architecture and Morphogenesis , 1996, Cell.

[194]  J. Risteli,et al.  Immunohistochemical study of type I collagen and type I pN‐collagen in benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms , 1995, Cancer.

[195]  R Fodde,et al.  A targeted chain-termination mutation in the mouse Apc gene results in multiple intestinal tumors. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[196]  S. Nathanson,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions, and breast parenchyma , 1994, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[197]  D. Longo,et al.  Interstitial pressure of subcutaneous nodules in melanoma and lymphoma patients: changes during treatment. , 1993, Cancer research.

[198]  R K Jain,et al.  Interstitial hypertension in human breast and colorectal tumors. , 1992, Cancer research.

[199]  K Messmer,et al.  Interstitial hypertension in head and neck tumors in patients: correlation with tumor size. , 1992, Cancer research.

[200]  R K Jain,et al.  Interstitial hypertension in superficial metastatic melanomas in humans. , 1991, Cancer research.

[201]  R K Jain,et al.  Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. , 1990, Cancer research.

[202]  P. Mozetic,et al.  Combining Type I Interferons and 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycitidine to Improve Anti-Tumor Response against Melanoma. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[203]  Cheng-Hsien Liu,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy μ-environment LabChip: taking advantage of optoelectronic tweezers. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[204]  John W. Park,et al.  Circulating Tumor Cells , 2017, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[205]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Erratum: A three-dimensional engineered tumour for spatial snapshot analysis of cell metabolism and phenotype in hypoxic gradients. , 2016, Nature Materials.

[206]  Jacques Prost,et al.  Supplements to : Isotropic stress reduces cell proliferation in tumor spheroids , 2011 .

[207]  Juergen Friedrich,et al.  Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[208]  Nicholas E. Timmins,et al.  Generation of multicellular tumor spheroids by the hanging-drop method. , 2007, Methods in molecular medicine.

[209]  A. Hart,et al.  Molecular markers of breast cancer metastasis , 2005 .

[210]  J. Folkman Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[211]  B. H. Cook,et al.  Blood Vessel Structure , 1976 .