Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Melissa L Rethlefsen | Tara J Brigham | Ann M. Farrell | Leah C Osterhaus Trzasko | M. Rethlefsen | Ann M Farrell
[1] Kaisra Esmail,et al. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? , 2013, Radiology.
[2] Su Golder,et al. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews. , 2014, Health information and libraries journal.
[3] A. Weller,et al. Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[4] Peter R. Nelson,et al. The Analysis of Means: A Graphical Method for Comparing Means, Rates, and Proportions , 1987 .
[5] Li Zhang,et al. Reporting of the Role of the Expert Searcher in Cochrane Reviews , 2006 .
[6] David Moher,et al. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[7] P. Major,et al. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004). , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[8] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9] I. Olkin,et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .
[10] Christine Urquhart,et al. Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample , 2011, Research synthesis methods.
[11] Jenny Craven,et al. Recording Database Searches for Systematic Reviews - What is the Value of Adding a Narrative to Peer-Review Checklists? A Case Study of NICE Interventional Procedures Guidance , 2011 .
[12] David Moher,et al. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[13] Falk Scholer,et al. Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..
[14] Su Golder,et al. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[15] David Moher,et al. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[16] R. Haynes,et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[17] David Moher,et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[18] P. Major,et al. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[19] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[20] Adriana Yoshii,et al. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[21] D. Moher,et al. EPC Response to IOM Standards for Systematic Reviews , 2013 .
[22] K. Shojania,et al. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. , 2001, Effective clinical practice : ECP.
[23] Laura A. Levit,et al. Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .
[24] Dean Giustini,et al. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.
[25] S. Golder,et al. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[26] R Brian Haynes,et al. BMC Medicine BioMed Central , 2003 .
[27] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[28] P. Tugwell,et al. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. , 2006, The Journal of rheumatology.
[29] H. Bastian,et al. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? , 2010, PLoS medicine.
[30] Julie Glanville,et al. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? , 2013, Systematic Reviews.
[31] C. Faggion,et al. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. , 2013, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[32] D Fitzgerald,et al. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. , 1990, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.
[33] J. McGowan,et al. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[34] D. Moher,et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[35] Laura A. Levit,et al. COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH , 2011 .
[36] J. McGowan,et al. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[37] David Moher,et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[38] Thomas Kaiser,et al. Routine development of objectively derived search strategies , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[39] Nancy H Tannery,et al. Reproducibility of Literature Search Reporting in Medical Education Reviews , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[40] Melissa L Rethlefsen,et al. Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles. , 2014, JAMA.
[41] Joyce A. Mitchell,et al. Evidence-based retrieval in evidence-based medicine. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[42] Robin A. Paynter,et al. Peer Review of Search Strategies , 2012 .
[43] G. Bartley,et al. Publishing systematic reviews in ophthalmology: new guidance for authors. , 2014, Ophthalmology.
[44] Klaus Krippendorff,et al. Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .
[45] F. Boop,et al. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.