Precarious work: recent research and policy challenges

The past three and half decades have witnessed profound and global changes in the organisation of work. The ‘standard’ employment model of the post-1945 period ‐ whereby most workers (though not most women workers) within Europe, North America and Australasia held ongoing jobs ‐ went into decline. In its place emerged what is often labelled the ‘new world of work’. We will not use this term because some of the work arrangements seen to be new actually represent the re-emergence of far older types of work organisation. 1 That matter aside, the changes that this term sought to describe were marked by the growth of more temporary work arrangements (fixed-term contracts, direct-hire temporary work, temporary agency work, on-call and casual work), self-employment and work remote from formal workplaces (including various forms of remote and home-based work, such as homecare). Further, even workers retaining notionally permanent jobs increasingly experienced insecurity as the result of repeated rounds of downsizing/restructuring and outsourcing/offshoring of activities by large private and public sector employers (in the public sector, these changes were also often associated with privatisation). In short, the growth of ‘flexible’ work arrangements marked by more irregular working hours and limited tenure has essentially made the jobs of a growing body of workers precarious. In tandem with this trend has been the growth of informal or undeclared work arrangements, often using migrant/undocumented workers, in Europe, North America and elsewhere. Since the 1990s, a rapidly growing body of international research has indicated that job insecurity and precarious work arrangements are associated with significant adverse effects on health and safety outcomes, as measured by the incidence of injury, catastrophic events (such as the AZF factory fire in Toulouse in 2001), exposure to hazardous substances, occupational violence, psychological distress, work‐life imbalance and non-compliance with workplace safety rules and regulations. 2‐9

[1]  이수정 해외산업간호정보 - 미국 산업안전보건연구원(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 소개 , 2009 .

[2]  K. Lippel,et al.  Women and Homework: The Canadian Legislative Framework , 2001 .

[3]  David Walters,et al.  Regulating Workplace Risks: A Comparative Study of Inspection Regimes in Times of Change , 2011 .

[4]  Temporary workers in Washington state. , 2010, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  K. Messing,et al.  Precarious employment conditions affect work content in education and social work: results of work analyses. , 2007, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[6]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  Overstretched and Unreciprocated Commitment: Reviewing Research on the Occupational Health and Safety Effects of Downsizing and Job Insecurity , 2009, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[7]  Elfi Baillien,et al.  Why is Organizational Change Related to Workplace Bullying? Role Conflict and Job Insecurity as Mediators , 2009 .

[8]  Annie Thébaud-Mony,et al.  Nuclear Servitude: Subcontracting and Health in the French Civil Nuclear Industry , 2011 .

[9]  Kaj Frick,et al.  Regulating Workplace Risks , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  Under Pressure, Out of Control, or Home Alone? Reviewing Research and Policy Debates on the Occupational Health and Safety Effects of Outsourcing and Home-Based Work , 2008, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[11]  M. Quinlan Workers’ compensation and the challenges posed by changing patterns of work: evidence from Australia , 2004 .

[12]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  Temporary employment and health: a review. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  P. Bohle,et al.  Working hours, work-life conflict and health in precarious and "permanent" employment. , 2004, Revista de saude publica.