Microaneurysm turnover is a predictor of diabetic retinopathy progression

Aim To analyse retinopathy phenotypes and microaneurysm (MA) turnover in mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) as predictors of progression to diabetic central-involved macular oedema (CIMO) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in two different ethnic populations. Methods 205 patients with type 2 DM and mild NPDR were followed in a prospective observational study for 2 years or until development of CIMO, in two centres from different regions of the world. Ophthalmological examinations, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus photography with RetmarkerDR analysis, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), were performed at baseline and 6 12 and 24 months. Results 158 eyes/patients reached either the study endpoint, CIMO (24) or performed the last study visit (24-month visit) without developing CIMO (134). From the eyes/patients in analysis, 27 eyes (17.1%) progressed to more advanced ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) levels: 6 progressed to mild NPDR (level 35), 15 progressed to moderate NPDR (level 43), 5 progressed to moderately severe NPDR (level 47) and 1 progressed to high risk PDR (level 71). Worsening in ETDRS level is associated with phenotype C (p=0.005). From the 130 eyes/patients with a low MA turnover, 18 (13.8%) eyes/patients had an increase in ETDRS level, and from the 19 eyes/patients with a high MA turnover, 9 (47.4%) had an increase in ETDRS level (p<0.001). Conclusion Eyes in the initial stages of diabetic retinopathy show different phenotypes with different risks for progression to CIMO. In phenotype C, MA turnover correlates with ETDRS grading worsening and development of CIMO.

[1]  R. Elston,et al.  Heritability of the severity of diabetic retinopathy: the FIND-Eye study. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. Cunha-Vaz,et al.  Different Phenotypes of Mild Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy with Different Risks for Development of Macular Edema (C-TRACER Study) , 2017, Ophthalmic Research.

[3]  T. Sano,et al.  [Diabetic retinopathy]. , 2001, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  Toke Bek,et al.  The relationships between risk factors and the distribution of retinopathy lesions in type 2 diabetes. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[5]  U. Chakravarthy,et al.  Molecular genetics of microvascular disease in diabetic retinopathy , 2003, Eye.

[6]  José Cunha-Vaz,et al.  Three different phenotypes of mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with different risks for development of clinically significant macular edema. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  J. Gerss,et al.  MICROANEURYSM FORMATION RATE AS A PREDICTIVE MARKER FOR PROGRESSION TO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT MACULAR EDEMA IN NONPROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY , 2014, Retina.

[8]  J. Cunha-Vaz,et al.  Subclinical Macular Edema as a Predictor of Progression to Clinically Significant Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetes , 2013, Ophthalmologica.

[9]  N. Bressler,et al.  TOPICAL NEPAFENEC IN EYES WITH NONCENTRAL DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA , 2015, Retina.

[10]  Rui Bernardes,et al.  Microaneurysm Turnover Is a Biomarker for Diabetic Retinopathy Progression to Clinically Significant Macular Edema: Findings for Type 2 Diabetics with Nonproliferative Retinopathy , 2009, Ophthalmologica.

[11]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Long-term Effects of Intravitreal 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant on Progression and Regression of Diabetic Retinopathy. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[12]  C. Forsblom,et al.  Heritability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy , 2008, Diabetes.

[13]  J. Cunha-Vaz,et al.  Genetic Variants in ICAM1, PPARGC1A and MTHFR Are Potentially Associated with Different Phenotypes of Diabetic Retinopathy , 2014, Ophthalmologica.

[14]  J. Ehrlich,et al.  The Clinical Importance of Changes in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[15]  H. Lund‐Andersen,et al.  Retinal Layer Location of Increased Retinal Thickness in Eyes with Subclinical and Clinical Macular Edema in Diabetes Type 2 , 2015, Ophthalmic Research.

[16]  M. C. Leske,et al.  The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. Pyke,et al.  Diabetic Retinopathy in Identical Twins , 1982, Diabetes.