Does the Business Case Matter? The Effect of a Perceived Business Case on Small Firms’ Social Engagement

The business case for social responsibility (BCSR) is one of the most widely studied topics in the business and society literature that focuses on large firms. This attention is understandable because large firms have an obligation to shareholders who, as commonly assumed, seek to maximize returns on their investments, in turn, pressing corporate managers to show that firms’ expenditures in social engagement would pay off. Small firms, on the other hand, rarely face such pressures, yet the BCSR logic is increasingly applied to small firms as well. Our primary objective in this paper is to examine whether and how much do small firm owners’ perceptions of BCSR affect the firm’s social engagement. In finding a fine-grained answer to those questions, we consider BCSR as a two-dimensional construct consisting of tangible and intangible benefits, and also integrate the BCSR perspective with the slack resource perspective to offer a motivation-capacity lens to examine firm’s social engagement. Drawing on a multi-industry sample of 478 small firms in the US, we find that while small firm owners’ perceptions about potential tangible benefits of social engagement are not related to the firm’s social engagement, perceptions about potential intangible are positively related. Firm's financial performance is also positively related to its social engagement, but there is no interaction between potential benefits and financial performance. This study contributes to an improved understanding about small firms’ social engagement, which still remains an understudied area. Our results are in line with studies which argue that firms’ social engagement is a response to institutional factors.

[1]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[2]  Gordon E. Greenley,et al.  A Comparison of Slack Resources in High and Low Performing British Companies , 1998 .

[3]  C. W. Moore,et al.  Ethical Attitudes in Small Businesses and Large Corporations: Theory and Empirical Findings from a Tracking Study Spanning Three Decades , 2006 .

[4]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[5]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  A. Carroll,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice , 2010 .

[7]  Louis H. Amato,et al.  The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving , 2007 .

[8]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Strategy as action : industry rivalry and coordination , 1997 .

[9]  G. Haynes,et al.  Socially Responsible Processes of Small Family Business Owners: Exploratory Evidence from the National Family Business Survey , 2010 .

[10]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute? , 2010 .

[11]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[12]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[14]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[15]  Kai Hockerts.  A Cognitive Perspective of the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability , 2013 .

[16]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[17]  H. Jenkins.  Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[18]  T. Baker,et al.  Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage , 2005 .

[19]  James Weber,et al.  Rethinking the Corporate Financial–Social Performance Relationship: Examining the Complex, Multistakeholder Notion of Corporate Social Performance , 2014 .

[20]  Wei Nurn Chong,et al.  Obtaining Intangible And Tangible Benefits From Corporate Social Responsibility , 2010 .

[21]  G. George.  Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms , 2005 .

[22]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Philanthropy as Strategy , 2003 .

[23]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms , 2012 .

[24]  P. Shrivastava.  The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[25]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[26]  Michael J. Maloni,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry , 2006 .

[27]  Ruth Hillary,et al.  Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment : Business Imperatives , 2017 .

[28]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict, Potency, and Consensus , 2005 .

[29]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2006 .

[30]  S. Waddock,et al.  Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources , 2010 .

[31]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning , 2007 .

[32]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[33]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  Under the Tip of the Iceberg: Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Strategy, and Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[34]  R. Buchholz,et al.  Research Notes. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND STOCK MARKET PERFORMANCE. , 1978 .

[35]  John L. Campbell.  Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[36]  Arieh A. Ullmann.  Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[37]  Ravi Dharwadkar,et al.  Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Moderating Roles of Attainment Discrepancy and Organization Slack , 2011 .

[38]  S. Brammer,et al.  Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance , 2008 .

[39]  Sarah Burton.  Making the Business Case for Sustainability , 2014 .

[40]  T. Luca,et al.  The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[41]  B. Husted,et al.  Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience , 2007 .

[42]  Anil Menon,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy , 1988 .

[43]  Allan R. Ryan,et al.  Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change , 2004 .

[44]  Y. Fassin.  SMEs and the Fallacy of Formalising CSR , 2008 .

[45]  L. Spence.  CSR and Small Business in a European Policy Context: The Five “C”s of CSR and Small Business Research Agenda 2007 , 2007 .

[46]  Joseph L. C. Cheng,et al.  Organizational Slack and Response to Environmental Shifts: The Impact of Resource Allocation Patterns , 1997 .

[47]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[48]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[49]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[50]  D. W. Thompson,et al.  The Legitimacy of CSR Actions of Publicly Traded Companies Versus Family-Owned Companies , 2014 .

[51]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[52]  Xiaohua Yang,et al.  Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective , 2009 .

[53]  A. I. Goldberg,et al.  Reputation Building: Small Business Strategies for Successful Venture Development* , 2003 .

[54]  S. Julian,et al.  Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis , 2013 .

[55]  J. McGuire,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance , 1988 .

[56]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance , 2014 .

[57]  F. Perrini.  SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective , 2006 .

[58]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[59]  H. R. Fogler,et al.  A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation , 1975 .

[60]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[61]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[62]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance , 2012 .

[63]  Reginald A. Litz,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration , 2003 .

[64]  Even Fallan.  Evaluating Social and Environmental Issues by Integrating the Legitimacy Gap with Expectational Gaps: An Empirical Assessment of the Forest Industry , 2015 .

[65]  Manuela Weber,et al.  The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR , 2008 .

[66]  R. Buchholz,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance , 1978 .

[67]  Jay J. Janney,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[68]  W. Pan,et al.  A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011 , 2014 .

[69]  R. M. Beal.  Competing Effectively: Environmental Scanning, Competitive Strategy, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms , 2000 .

[70]  D. Baden,et al.  Terminology Matters: A Critical Exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility Terms , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[71]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[72]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Organizational Restructuring And Economic Performance In Leveraged Buyouts: An Ex Post Study , 1995 .

[73]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Legitimacy, Visibility, and the Antecedents of Corporate Social Performance: An Investigation of the Instrumental Perspective , 2011 .

[74]  K. File,et al.  Cause Related Marketing and Corporate Philanthropy in the Privately Held Enterprise , 1998 .

[75]  A. Scherer,et al.  Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Large Firms: Size Matters , 2011 .

[76]  M. Hartmann.  Corporate social responsibility in the food sector , 2011 .

[77]  D. Wood.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review , 2010 .

[78]  Charles J. Fornaciari,et al.  Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis☆ , 2004 .

[79]  R. Morgan,et al.  Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation , 2003 .

[80]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[81]  Jose M. Arau.  Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2002 .

[82]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[83]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[84]  Patricia L. Smith,et al.  A Study of the Ethical Values of Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Small Business Owners , 1994 .

[85]  Robert Blackburn,et al.  The business case for sustainability? An examination of small firms in the UK's construction and restaurant sectors , 2007 .

[86]  Robert E. Carpenter,et al.  Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance? , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[87]  Philipp Schreck,et al.  Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis , 2011 .

[88]  Jan Lepoutre,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review , 2006 .

[89]  D. Williamson,et al.  Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR , 2006 .

[90]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation , 2009 .

[91]  Søren Jeppesen,et al.  SMEs and CSR in Developing Countries , 2017 .

[92]  T. Gössling,et al.  The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2008 .

[93]  Laura J. Spence,et al.  Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial , 2003 .

[94]  Barbara R. Bartkus,et al.  Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance , 2004 .

[95]  Laurence G. Weinzimmer.  A Replication and Extension of Organizational Growth Determinants , 2000 .

[96]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[97]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[98]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[99]  D. Siegel,et al.  Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability , 2011 .

[100]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[101]  高橋 進.  サイアート, マーチの「A Behavioral Theory of the Firm」 , 1995 .

[102]  Ulrich Steger,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:: Literature Review and Research Options , 2005 .

[103]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[104]  Phil Harris,et al.  Communicating corporate social responsibility: an exploratory case study of a major UK retail centre , 2006 .

[105]  Niklas Egels-Zandén.  7 The corporate social performance dilemma , 2006 .

[106]  H. Jenkins,et al.  A Business Opportunity Model of Corporate Social Responsibility for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2009 .

[107]  Wan Saiful Wan-Jan.  Defining corporate social responsibility , 2006 .

[108]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[109]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[110]  Shailendra Vyakarnam,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms , 1997 .

[111]  D. Jamali,et al.  Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR , 2009 .

[112]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms , 2009 .