Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Use During Pregnancy: A Brief Review and Concise Guide for Clinicians.

Compared to the general population, women with histories of psychotic and affective illnesses are at increased risk of psychiatric symptoms during pregnancy.1,2 Although maintenance antipsychotic therapy is important to prevent relapses both in patients with schizophrenia3 and in many patients with bipolar disorder,4 clinicians are more likely to discontinue oral antipsychotic prescriptions for pregnant women as compared to nonpregnant women.5 This trend is likely due to concerns of teratogenicity5 even though current pregnancy safety data of oral antipsychotics are largely reassuring, with no significant increased risk for major congenital malformations.6 In the case of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), we have observed an even greater tendency for clinicians either to not begin or to discontinue LAI prescriptions during pregnancy. This phenomenon occurs even in women with extremely high risk for psychiatric illness recurrence despite the established value of LAIs in the treatment of such individuals7 and despite the fact that use of these medications is supported by the current research, which has identified no clear contraindication to LAI use in pregnancy.8–10 In this article, we will discuss the judicious use of LAIs in pregnant women. LAIs are injectable forms of antipsychotics designed to improve medication adherence and prevent psychiatric symptom recurrence. There are currently 6 antipsychotics available in LAI formulation in the US: aripiprazole, fluphenazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone. LAI formulations differ in their dosing schedule, ranging from 2 weeks to several months for newer, extended release formulations. Compared to oral forms of antipsychotics, LAIs are superior in preventing psychiatric hospitalization.11 Other advantages of LAIs include increased clinician knowledge around medication adherence, reduced risk of overdose, and more frequent and standardized contact between clinicians and patients.7 Current data show that overall, the side effects of LAI medications reflect those of their oral counterparts.12 An exception to this finding is long-acting olanzapine, which requires a 3-hour observation period after administration to monitor for symptoms of post-injection sedation syndrome.13 As with all psychopharmacologic decisions in pregnant patients, when considering prescribing an LAI during pregnancy, it is important to identify the known and potential risks versus known and potential benefits associated with either providing or withholding psychopharmacologic treatment. Women with histories of severe psychiatric illness who are nonadherent with antipsychotic medication during the first trimester are almost twice as likely to relapse as compared to women who are adherent.14 These psychiatric relapses during the perinatal period are not insignificant, as severe psychiatric symptoms during pregnancy are associated with poor outcomes for mother and infant. Untreated schizophrenia or bipolar disorder may be an independent risk factor for congenital malformations in the newborn,15 and antepartum psychosis can lead to the psychotic denial of pregnancy.16 We suggest that the appropriate patient to receive an LAI during pregnancy should not differ significantly from the appropriate patient to receive an LAI when they are not pregnant. Women with histories of hospitalizations precipitated by medication nonadherence are appropriate candidates. Women with histories of frequent and extended psychiatric hospitalizations associated with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and, for some women, bipolar disorder should also be considered. Also, psychiatric decompensation during previous pregnancies or the immediate postpartum period or a history of illicit substance use are additional clinical risk factors that would tip clinical decision-making toward LAI use over an oral antipsychotic. Prior to prescribing the LAI, the psychiatrist should establish that the patient has the capacity to engage in a discussion of informed consent. Ideally, this discussion would include the woman’s partner and should occur prior to conception. Known antipsychotic risks in nonpregnant populations in addition to pregnancy-related risks of oral antipsychotics should be reviewed together with the limited safety data for LAI formulations in pregnancy. For a balanced and comprehensive informed consent process to take place, the psychiatrist should also review and document the current limitations of known safety data and the risks of psychiatric decompensation from untreated or undertreated illness. When choosing LAI formulations for the pregnant patient, it is important to first consider the same factors as when treating the nonpregnant patient. Important factors for the treating psychiatric clinician to consider include previous efficacy of the oral formulation, the patient’s ability to be compliant with the needed time for overlap with the oral formulation, potential side effects, and cost.17 When the symptoms are primarily affective in nature, a clinician should be reminded that the first line of treatment for bipolar disorder is lithium, with an antipsychotic recommended only as second-line therapy.18 If an LAI is indicated, the clinician should also consider that the FDA has only approved long-acting formulations of aripiprazole and risperidone for the treatment of bipolar disorder. There are, however, several additional factors to consider when administering an LAI to a pregnant woman. Table 1 lists several aDepartment of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York bDepartments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York cFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York *Corresponding author: Kristina M. Deligiannidis, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, 75-59 263rd St, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 (kdeligian1@northwell.edu). J Clin Psychiatry 2020;81(6):20ac13597