Product-state approximations to quantum ground states

The local Hamiltonian problem consists of estimating the ground-state energy (given by the minimum eigenvalue) of a local quantum Hamiltonian. It can be considered as a quantum generalization of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and has a key role in quantum complexity theory, being the first and most natural QMA-complete problem known. An interesting regime for the local Hamiltonian problem is that of extensive error, where one is interested in estimating the mean ground-state energy to constant accuracy. The problem is NP-hard by the PCP theorem, but whether it is QMA-hard is an important open question in quantum complexity theory. A positive solution would represent a quantum analogue of the PCP theorem. A key feature that distinguishes quantum Hamiltonians from classical CSPs is that the solutions may involve complicated entangled states. In this paper, we demonstrate several large classes of Hamiltonians for which product (i.e. unentangled) states can approximate the ground state energy to within a small extensive error. First, we show the mere existence of a good product-state approximation for the ground-state energy of 2-local Hamiltonians with one of more of the following properties: (1) super-constant degree, (2) small expansion, or (3) a ground state with sublinear entanglement with respect to some partition into small pieces. The approximation based on degree is a new and surprising difference between quantum Hamiltonians and classical CSPs, since in the classical setting, higher degree is usually associated with harder CSPs. The approximation based on expansion is not new, but the approximation based on low entanglement was previously known only in the regime where the entanglement was close to zero. Since the existence of a low-energy product state can be checked in NP, this implies that any Hamiltonian used for a quantum PCP theorem should have: (1) constant degree, (2) constant expansion, (3) a ``volume law'' for entanglement with respect to any partition into small parts. Second, we show that in several cases, good product-state approximations not only exist, but can be found in deterministic polynomial time: (1) 2-local Hamiltonians on any planar graph, solving an open problem of Bansal, Bravyi, and Terhal, (2) dense k-local Hamiltonians for any constant k, solving an open problem of Gharibian and Kempe, and (3) 2-local Hamiltonians on graphs with low threshold rank, via a quantum generalization of a recent result of Barak, Raghavendra and Steurer. Our work involves two new tools which may be of independent interest. First, we prove a new quantum version of the de Finetti theorem which does not require the usual assumption of symmetry. Second, we describe a way to analyze the application of the Lasserre/Parrilo SDP hierarchy to local quantum Hamiltonians.

[1]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[2]  Noga Alon,et al.  Random sampling and approximation of MAX-CSP problems , 2002, STOC '02.

[3]  Irit Dinur,et al.  The PCP theorem by gap amplification , 2006, STOC.

[4]  Aram W. Harrow,et al.  The Church of the Symmetric Subspace , 2013, 1308.6595.

[5]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[6]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  Quantum simulation of many-body Hamiltonians using perturbation theory with bounded-strength interactions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[7]  Julia Kempe,et al.  The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem , 2004, FSTTCS.

[8]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification , 2008, STOC '09.

[9]  Benjamin Schlein,et al.  Quantum Fluctuations and Rate of Convergence Towards Mean Field Dynamics , 2007, 0711.3087.

[10]  F. Brandão,et al.  Faithful Squashed Entanglement , 2010, 1010.1750.

[11]  N. Linial,et al.  Expander Graphs and their Applications , 2006 .

[12]  Grant Schoenebeck,et al.  Linear Level Lasserre Lower Bounds for Certain k-CSPs , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[13]  Ran Raz,et al.  A parallel repetition theorem , 1995, STOC '95.

[14]  E. Størmer Symmetric states of infinite tensor products of C*-algebras , 1969 .

[15]  Dong Yang A simple proof of monogamy of entanglement , 2006, quant-ph/0604168.

[16]  R. Werner An application of Bell's inequalities to a quantum state extension problem , 1989 .

[17]  Sandy Irani,et al.  The Quantum and Classical Complexity of Translationally Invariant Tiling and Hamiltonian Problems , 2009, 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[18]  Barbara M. Terhal,et al.  The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice , 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[19]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Commutative version of the local Hamiltonian problem and common eigenspace problem , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[20]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[21]  Tillmann Baumgratz,et al.  Lower bounds for ground states of condensed matter systems , 2012 .

[22]  M. Hastings,et al.  Markov entropy decomposition: a variational dual for quantum belief propagation. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[23]  Barbara M. Terhal Is entanglement monogamous? , 2004, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[24]  Aram Wettroth Harrow,et al.  Quantum de Finetti Theorems Under Local Measurements with Applications , 2012, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[25]  W. Vega,et al.  MAX-CUT has a randomized approximation scheme in dense graphs , 1996, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[26]  A. Montanaro Some applications of hypercontractive inequalities in quantum information theory , 2012, 1208.0161.

[27]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Computational complexity of interacting electrons and fundamental limitations of density functional theory , 2007, 0712.0483.

[28]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation , 2001, quant-ph/0104088.

[29]  Dong Yang,et al.  Squashed Entanglement for Multipartite States and Entanglement Measures Based on the Mixed Convex Roof , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[30]  Thomas Barthel,et al.  Solving condensed-matter ground-state problems by semidefinite relaxations. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[31]  A. Winter,et al.  Robustness of Quantum Markov Chains , 2006, quant-ph/0611057.

[32]  M. B. Plenio,et al.  A paradox in bosonic energy computations via semidefinite programming relaxations , 2012, 1203.3777.

[33]  Quantum de Finetti Theorems under Local Measurements with Applications , 2012 .

[34]  Cécilia Lancien,et al.  Distinguishing Multi-Partite States by Local Measurements , 2012, 1206.2884.

[35]  D. Poulin,et al.  Quantum Markov Networks and Commuting Hamiltonians , 2012, 1206.0755.

[36]  Julia Kempe,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for QMA-Complete Problems , 2011, 2011 IEEE 26th Annual Conference on Computational Complexity.

[37]  T. Osborne Hamiltonian complexity , 2011, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[38]  Brenda S. Baker,et al.  Approximation algorithms for NP-complete problems on planar graphs , 1983, 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1983).

[39]  Itai Arad,et al.  A note about a partial no-go theorem for quantum PCP , 2010, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[40]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  On the Complexity of Commuting Local Hamiltonians, and Tight Conditions for Topological Order in Such Systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[41]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  Convergence of SDP hierarchies for polynomial optimization on the hypersphere , 2012, ArXiv.

[42]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  Commuting Local Hamiltonians on Expanders, Locally Testable Quantum codes, and the qPCP conjecture , 2013, 1301.3407.

[43]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , 2005, cond-mat/0505140.

[44]  Marek Karpinski,et al.  Polynomial time approximation schemes for dense instances of NP-hard problems , 1995, STOC '95.

[45]  M. Fannes,et al.  Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains , 1992 .

[46]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[47]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of NP , 1998, JACM.

[48]  Nikhil Bansal,et al.  Classical approximation schemes for the ground-state energy of quantum and classical ising spin hamiltonians on planar graphs , 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[49]  Moses Charikar,et al.  Integrality gaps for Sherali-Adams relaxations , 2009, STOC '09.

[50]  R. Renner Symmetry of large physical systems implies independence of subsystems , 2007 .

[51]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Convergent Relaxations of Polynomial Optimization Problems with Noncommuting Variables , 2009, SIAM J. Optim..

[52]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems , 1992, Proceedings., 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[53]  David A Mazziotti,et al.  Realization of quantum chemistry without wave functions through first-order semidefinite programming. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[54]  Matthew B. Hastings,et al.  Quantum systems on non-k-hyperfinite complexes: a generalization of classical statistical mechanics on expander graphs , 2013, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[55]  Marek Karpinski,et al.  Polynomial time approximation schemes for dense instances of minimum constraint satisfaction , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[56]  Renato Renner Symmetry implies independence , 2007 .

[57]  Norbert Schuch,et al.  Complexity of commuting Hamiltonians on a square lattice of qubits , 2011, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[58]  G. Vidal Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[59]  R. Renner,et al.  A de Finetti representation for finite symmetric quantum states , 2004, quant-ph/0410229.

[60]  M. Hastings Matrix product operators and central elements: Classical description of a quantum state , 2012, 1207.1671.

[61]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  One-and-a-Half Quantum de Finetti Theorems , 2007 .

[62]  D. Freedman,et al.  Finite Exchangeable Sequences , 1980 .

[63]  Sandy Irani,et al.  The Power of Quantum Systems on a Line , 2007, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[64]  A. Winter,et al.  Communications in Mathematical Physics Structure of States Which Satisfy Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy with Equality , 2022 .

[65]  John Watrous,et al.  Quantum Computational Complexity , 2008, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[66]  J. Ignacio Cirac,et al.  Ground states of fermionic lattice Hamiltonians with permutation symmetry , 2013, 1305.4577.

[67]  Matthew B. Hastings,et al.  Trivial low energy states for commuting Hamiltonians, and the quantum PCP conjecture , 2012, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[68]  Norbert Schuch,et al.  Entropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[69]  J. Eisert,et al.  Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review , 2008, 0808.3773.

[70]  Yasuda,et al.  Direct determination of the quantum-mechanical density matrix using the density equation. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[71]  Prasad Raghavendra,et al.  Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies , 2011, SODA.

[72]  R. Werner,et al.  Quantum Statistical Mechanics of General Mean Field Systems , 1989 .

[73]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  The regularity lemma and approximation schemes for dense problems , 1996, Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.

[74]  Matthew B Hastings,et al.  Area laws in quantum systems: mutual information and correlations. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[75]  Madhur Tulsiani,et al.  SDP Gaps from Pairwise Independence , 2012, Theory Comput..

[76]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Tensor decomposition and approximation schemes for constraint satisfaction problems , 2005, STOC '05.

[77]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  Guest column: the quantum PCP conjecture , 2013, SIGA.

[78]  Adam D. Bookatz QMA-complete problems , 2012, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[79]  R. Hudson,et al.  Locally normal symmetric states and an analogue of de Finetti's theorem , 1976 .

[80]  Prasad Raghavendra,et al.  Rounding Semidefinite Programming Hierarchies via Global Correlation , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.