Carotenoid-based ornamentation and status signaling in the house finch

The status signaling hypothesis (SSH) was devised primarily to explain the adaptive significance of avian ornamental coloration during the nonbreeding season. It proposes that conspicuous male plumage serves as an honest signal of social status within a population of birds. However, to date this hypothesis has been well tested and supported for only one type of plumage coloration, melanin-based coloration. Carotenoid-based pigmentation is known to positively reveal male health and condition during molt in a variety of species, but it is poorly understood whether this ornament type can also function as a status signal during the winter. We tested the SSH in male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) by manipulating the carotenoid-based plumage brightness of first-year males and then pairing unfamiliar birds of differing coloration in a series of dominance trials in captivity. Manipulated plumage color was unrelated to win/loss outcome in these trials. Similarly, the natural pigmentation of males was a poor predictor of winter dominance; as in other studies with this species, we found only a weak tendency for naturally drab males to dominate naturally bright males. These results suggest that carotenoid-based coloration is not a reliable indicator of social status in male house finches during the nonbreeding season. In fact, carotenoid-based coloration may function only in mate choice in this species, and it may be retained throughout the year either because time constraints preclude a second plumage molt or because it aids in pair formation that begins in late winter.

[1]  O. Hogstad.  Social organization and dominance behavior in some Parus species , 1989 .

[2]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Dominance relationships between resident and transient wintering Siskins , 1990 .

[3]  Sievert Rohwer,et al.  THE SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AVIAN WINTER PLUMAGE VARIABILITY , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Status signaling in Dark-eyed Juncos : Perceived status of other birds affects dominance interactions , 1996 .

[5]  M. Brown,et al.  Access to Winter Food Resources by Bright- versus Dull-Colored House Finches , 1988 .

[6]  D. Whitfield.  Plumage variability, status signalling and individual recognition in avian flocks , 1987 .

[7]  P. Hammerstein.  The role of asymmetries in animal contests , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  G. Hill,et al.  Plumage redness predicts breeding onset and reproductive success in the House Finch: A validation of Darwin's theory , 2001 .

[9]  G. Hill,et al.  Pairing success relative to male plumage redness and pigment symmetry in the house finch: temporal and geographic constancy , 1999 .

[10]  J. C. Senar.  Plumage coloration as a signal of social status , 1999 .

[11]  D. L. Fox.  Animal biochromes and structural colours , 1953 .

[12]  G. Hill.  Proximate basis of variation in carotenoid pigmentation in male house finches , 1992 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  A. Dufty,et al.  Plumage Variation, Plasma Steroids and Social Dominance in Male House Finches , 1994 .

[15]  G. Hill,et al.  Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  B. Enoksson.  Age- and sex-related differences in dominance and foraging behaviour of nuthatches Sitta europaea , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  S. Gauthreaux,et al.  Aggression and dominance in house finches , 1991 .

[18]  G F Oster,et al.  Pattern formation models and developmental constraints. , 1989, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[19]  G. Hill,et al.  PLUMAGE BRIGHTNESS AND BREEDING-SEASON DOMINANCE IN THE HOUSE FINCH: A NEGATIVELY CORRELATED HANDICAP? , 2000 .

[20]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Variation in Black Bib of the Eurasian Siskin (Carduelis spinus) and Its Role as a Reliable Badge of Dominance , 1993 .

[21]  A. Brush.  Metabolism of carotenoid pigments in birds , 1990, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[22]  D. A. Gray.  Carotenoids and Sexual Dichromatism in North American Passerine Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[23]  G. Hill,et al.  Melanin–based plumage coloration in the house finch is unaffected by coccidial infection , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  A. Møller.  Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  G. Hill,et al.  Evolution of sexual dichromatism: contribution of carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration , 2000 .

[26]  A. Møller.  Natural and sexual selection on a plumage signal of status and on morphology in house sparrows, Passer domesticus , 1989 .

[27]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G. Hill,et al.  EFFECTS OF COCCIDIAL AND MYCOPLASMAL INFECTIONS ON CAROTENOID-BASED PLUMAGE PIGMENTATION IN MALE HOUSE FINCHES , 2000 .

[29]  L. L. Wolfenbarger.  Is red coloration of male Northern Cardinals beneficial during the nonbreeding season?: A test of status signaling , 1999 .

[30]  G. Hill.  Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality , 1991, Nature.

[31]  S. Rohwer.  The Evolution of Reliable and Unreliable Badges of Fighting Ability , 1982 .

[32]  I. Owens,et al.  Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait , 1999, Nature.

[33]  G. Hill.  Energetic constraints on expression of carotenoid-based plumage coloration , 2000 .

[34]  J. Veiga,et al.  Nutritional constraints determine the expression of a sexual trait in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. Senar,et al.  Status signalling and the ability to recognize dominants: an experiment with siskins (Carduelis spinus) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  G. Hill,et al.  Ultraviolet reflectance of colored plastic leg bands , 1999 .

[37]  G. Hill.  Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection , 1994 .

[38]  Frank C. Rohwer,et al.  Status signalling in harris sparrows: Experimental deceptions achieved , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  A. Poole,et al.  House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) , 1993 .

[40]  J. S. Collins,et al.  The ultraviolet receptor of bird retinas. , 1984, Science.

[41]  K. Norris.  Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major , 1993, Nature.

[42]  G. Hill.  Redness as a measure of the production cost of ornamental coloration , 1996 .

[43]  K. Able,et al.  Age-related dominance in male dark-eyed juncos: effects of plumage and prior residence , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  T. Goodwin.  The biochemistry of the carotenoids , 1980 .

[45]  G. Butcher,et al.  The Evolution of Conspicuous and Distinctive Coloration for Communication in Birds , 1989 .

[46]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[47]  Geoffrey E. Hill,et al.  Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  Matthias Leu,et al.  High Parasite Load in House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is Correlated with Reduced Expression of a Sexually Selected Trait , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[49]  G. Hill.  Geographic variation in the carotenoid plumage pigmentation of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) , 1993 .

[50]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of fighting behaviour: The effect of variation in resource value , 1987 .

[51]  Craig W. Osenberg,et al.  Signals of status in wintering white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  V. Olson,et al.  Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  Kris H. Johnson,et al.  Preferences of female American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) for natural and artificial male traits , 1993 .