Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances.

The promotion of biofuels as energy for transportation in the industrialized countries is mainly driven by the perspective of oil depletion, the concerns about energy security and global warming. However due to sustainability constraints, biofuels will replace only 10 to 15% of fossil liquid fuels in the transport sector. Several governments have defined a minimum target of GHG emissions reduction for those biofuels that will be eligible to public incentives, for example a 35% emissions reduction in case of biofuels in Members States of the European Union. This article points out the significant biases in estimating GHG balances of biofuels stemming from modelling choices about system definition and boundaries, functional unit, reference systems and allocation methods. The extent to which these choices influence the results is investigated. After performing a comparison and constructive criticism of various modelling choices, the LCA of wheat-to-bioethanol is used as an illustrative case where bioethanol is blended with gasoline at various percentages (E5, E10 and E85). The performance of these substitution options is evaluated as well. The results show a large difference in the reduction of the GHG emissions with a high sensitivity to the following factors: the method used to allocate the impacts between the co-products, the type of reference systems, the choice of the functional unit and the type of blend. The authors come out with some recommendations for basing the estimation of energy and GHG balances of biofuels on principles such as transparency, consistency and accuracy.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases , 2008 .

[3]  Tim Grant,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of emissions from fuel ethanol and blends in Australian heavy and light vehicles , 2007 .

[4]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[5]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation , 2006 .

[6]  B. Weidema Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Choices in calculating life cycle emissions of carbon containing gases associated with forest derived biofuels , 2003 .

[8]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Sustainable Liquid Biofuels Development for Transport: Frequently Asked Questions and Review of Initiatives , 2008 .

[9]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  A Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for California, Part 1: Technical Analysis , 2007 .

[10]  R. Frischknecht ecoinvent Data v1.1 (2004): From heterogenous databases to unified and transparent LCI data , 2005 .

[11]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[12]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[13]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Accounting for indirect land-use changes in GHG balances of biofuels , 2008 .

[14]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Estimating Energy and Greenhouse gas balances of biofuels: Concepts and methodologies , 2008 .

[15]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – What determines this? , 2009 .

[16]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from indirect land-use change in biofuels production: concepts and exploratory analysis for soybean-based biodiesel production , 2008 .

[17]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain i. system expansion , 2002 .

[18]  D. Spracklen,et al.  Carbon Mitigation by Biofuels or by Saving and Restoring Forests? , 2007, Science.

[19]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[20]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[21]  P Watson,et al.  Carbon reporting within the renewable transport fuel obligation - methodology , 2007 .

[22]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[23]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree , 2004 .

[24]  P. Kaparaju,et al.  Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[26]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[27]  M. A. Elsayed,et al.  CARBON AND ENERGY BALANCES FOR A RANGE OF BIOFUELS OPTIONS , 2003 .

[28]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[29]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[30]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Etude comparative de carburants par analyse de leur cycle de vie , 2002 .

[31]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update , 2002 .

[32]  Electo Eduardo Silva Lora,et al.  Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security , 2009 .

[33]  E. Gnansounou,et al.  Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export , 2009 .