Experiments toward non-contact safety standards for automated industrial vehicles

The performance evaluation of an obstacle detection and segmentation algorithm for Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) navigation in factory-like environments using a new 3D real-time range camera is the subject of this paper. Our approach expands on the US ASME B56.5 Safety Standard, which now allows for non-contact safety sensors, by performing tests on objects specifically sized in both the US and the British Safety Standards. These successful tests placed the recommended, as well as smaller, material-covered and sized objects on the vehicle path for static measurement. The segmented (mapped) obstacles were then verified in range to the objects and object size using simultaneous, absolute measurements obtained using a relatively accurate 2D scanning laser rangefinder. These 3D range cameras are expected to be relatively inexpensive and used indoors and possibly used outdoors for a vast amount of mobile robot applications building on experimental results explained in this paper.

[1]  B. Achiriloaie,et al.  VI REFERENCES , 1961 .

[2]  George K. Papakonstantinou,et al.  Localized qualitative navigation for indoor environments , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  i-Fork: a flexible AGV system using topological and grid maps , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[4]  Charles E. Thorpe,et al.  A trinocular stereo system for highway obstacle detection , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[5]  Clark F. Olson,et al.  Robust stereo ego-motion for long distance navigation , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[6]  Sanjiv Singh,et al.  Obstacle detection using adaptive color segmentation and color stereo homography , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[7]  Tommy Chang,et al.  Feature detection and tracking for mobile robots using a combination of ladar and color images , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[8]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Passive night vision sensor comparison for unmanned ground vehicle stereo vision navigation , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[9]  Abder Koukam,et al.  A voting stereo matching method for real-time obstacle detection , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[10]  William C. Stone,et al.  Performance Analysis of Next-Generation LADAR for Manufacturing , 2004 .

[11]  R Madhavan,et al.  Obstacle Detection using a TOF Range Camera for Indoor AGV Navigation , 2004 .

[12]  Massimo Bertozzi,et al.  Artificial vision in road vehicles , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  Marilyn N. Abrams,et al.  Concealment and Obstacle Detection for Autonomous Driving , 1999 .

[14]  Raj Madhavan,et al.  Obstacle detection using a Time-of-Flight range camera for Automated Guided Vehicle safety and navigation , 2005, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[15]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Laser intensity-based obstacle detection , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[16]  V. Willhoeft,et al.  Laser scanners for obstacle detection in automotive applications , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8511).