The neural basis of temporal preparation: Insights from brain tumor patients

When foreperiods (FPs) of different duration vary on a trial-by-trial basis equiprobably but randomly, the RT is faster as the FP increases (variable FP effect), and becomes slower as the FP on the preceding trial gets longer (sequential effects). It is unclear whether the two effects are due to a common mechanism or to two different ones. Patients with lesions on the right lateral prefrontal cortex do not show the typical FP effect, suggesting a deficit in monitoring the FP adequately [Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Picton, T. W., Binns, M. A., Macdonald, R., et al. (2005). Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia, 43, 396-417]. The aim of this study was two-fold: (1) to replicate this neuropsychological result testing cerebral tumor patients before and after surgical removal of the tumor located unilaterally in the prefrontal, premotor or parietal cortex, respectively and (2) to investigate whether the sequential effects would change together with the FP effect (supporting single-process accounts) or the two effects can be dissociated across tumor locations (suggesting dual-process views). The results of an experiment with a variable FP paradigm show a significant reduction of the FP effect selectively after excision of tumors on right prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, the sequential effects were reliably reduced especially after surgical removal of tumors located in the left premotor region, despite a normal FP effect. The latter dissociation between the two effects supports a dual-process account of the variable FP phenomena. This study demonstrates that testing acute cerebral tumor patients represents a viable neuropsychological approach for the fractionation and localisation of cognitive processes.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[2]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The Fractionation of Supervisory Control , 2004 .

[3]  E. Soetens,et al.  Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time , 1985 .

[4]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in time reproduction: an investigation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  D. Heslenfeld,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: electrophysiological evidence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  A. Riehle,et al.  The predictive value for performance speed of preparatory changes in neuronal activity of the monkey motor and premotor cortex , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[8]  Pío Tudela,et al.  The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: determinants and attributes , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  T. Shallice,et al.  Right prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval: a functional MRI test of the monitoring hypothesis. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[12]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[14]  R. Henson,et al.  Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time , 1971 .

[17]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.). , 2000 .

[18]  Donald T Stuss,et al.  Frontal lobes and attention: Processes and networks, fractionation and integration , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[19]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Keeping time: Effects of focal frontal lesions , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  B. Hommel,et al.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task , 2004, Psychological research.

[21]  J. Grafman,et al.  Sustained attention deficits in pat ients with right frontal lesions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Distributed neural systems for temporal production: A functional MRI study , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[23]  K. Lange,et al.  Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[24]  K. Shenoy,et al.  Delay of movement caused by disruption of cortical preparatory activity. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Selective deficit of time perception in a patient with right prefrontal cortex lesion , 2002, Neurology.

[26]  Katya Rubia,et al.  A right hemispheric frontocerebellar network for time discrimination of several hundreds of milliseconds , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  T. Shallice,et al.  Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[29]  H. Woodrow The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[30]  D. Stuss,et al.  Principles of frontal lobe function , 2002 .

[31]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D H DRAZIN,et al.  Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Jesus Alegria Iscoa,et al.  Sequential effects of foreperiod duration: some strategical factors in tasks involving time uncertainty , 1975 .

[34]  F. Vidal,et al.  Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. Rabbitt,et al.  Selected complications in neuro-oncology patients. , 1998, Seminars in Oncology Nursing.

[36]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[38]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[39]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[41]  T. Shallice,et al.  Frontal lesions and sustained attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  S. Los,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  R. Knight,et al.  Cortical Networks Underlying Mechanisms of Time Perception , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  T. Shallice,et al.  Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Alick Elithorn,et al.  Central Inhibition—Some Refractory Observations , 1955 .

[46]  L. Karlin Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  R Näätänen,et al.  The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Sara Torriero,et al.  Underestimation of time perception after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Neurology.

[50]  Frank Agter,et al.  Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Fractionation of the supervisory system. , 2002 .

[52]  R. Miall,et al.  Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[54]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .