On the value of management history: Absorbing the past to understand the present and inform the future

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the value of management history as a contributor to the development of the theory and practice of management and, to the extent that it is necessary to absorb the past in order to understand the present and inform the future, consider what happens to the knowledge base when the surviving “contributions” to the knowledge base are partial and, indeed, erroneous.Design/methodology/approach – The articles that constitute this special issue form the launching‐pad for this discussion, with the ideas presented here combined with previous research and commentaries on the issues raised.Research limitations/implications – In The Life of Reason, Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”. Managers looking for the “next big thing”, without being able to incorporate it effectively into their experience, and the experience of those who are long gone, are condemned to repeat not just the past, but also the mistakes of the past. Accor...

[1]  D. Wren.  The History of Management Thought , 2004 .

[2]  A. Mills,et al.  Maslow: man interrupted: reading management theory in context , 2005 .

[3]  D. Lamond.  A matter of style: reconciling Henri and Henry , 2004 .

[4]  George Santayana,et al.  The Life of Reason , 1936 .

[5]  L. Bolman,et al.  Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. Jossey-Bass Management Series, Social and Behavioral Science Series, and Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1991 .

[6]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development , 2004 .

[7]  T. Boyns,et al.  British management theory and practice: the impact of Fayol , 2005 .

[8]  Fremont E. Kast,et al.  Organization and Management , 1985 .

[9]  M. Jackson.  The eighteenth century antecedents of bureaucracy, the Cameralists , 2005 .

[10]  Richard T. Mowday,et al.  Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development , 2004 .

[11]  N. Carter.  General and Industrial Management , 1986 .

[12]  W. Whyte,et al.  The Manager ’ s Job : Folklore and Fact , 2002 .

[13]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[14]  M. Smith.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact. , 1975 .

[16]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[17]  D. Lamond.  THE IRRATIONAL USE OF WEBER'S IDEAL TYPES , 1990 .

[18]  D. Lamond.  Henry Mintzberg vs Henri Fayol: Of Lighthouses, Cubists and the Emperor's New Clothes , 2003 .

[19]  W. Siffin,et al.  Bureaucracy , 1971 .

[20]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[21]  J. Spender,et al.  Speaking about management education , 2005 .

[22]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Business School Business: Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience , 2004 .

[23]  M. Buckley,et al.  Barnard on conflicts of responsibility: Implications for today's perspectives on transformational and authentic leadership , 2005 .

[24]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  Fads, stereotypes and management gurus: Fayol and Follett today , 2005 .

[25]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Timeless advice: Daniel Defoe and small business management , 2005 .

[26]  J. Humphreys.  Contextual implications for transformational and servant leadership , 2005 .

[27]  Robert F. Grattan.  Strategy in the Battle of Britain and strategic management theory , 2005 .

[28]  A C HAYDEN,et al.  Organization and management. , 1947, Hospital Council bulletin.

[29]  C. Nyland,et al.  Mary van Kleeck, Taylorism and the control of management knowledge , 2005 .