Regulation of the specialized DNA polymerase eta: Revisiting the biological relevance of its PCNA‐ and ubiquitin‐binding motifs

During translesion synthesis (TLS), low‐fidelity polymerases of the Y‐family polymerases bypass DNA damages that block the progression of conventional processive DNA polymerases, thereby allowing the completion of DNA replication. Among the TLS polymerases, DNA polymerase eta (polη) performs nucleotide incorporation past ultraviolet (UV) photoproducts and is deficient in cancer‐prone xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) syndrome. Upon UV irradiation, the DNA sliding clamp PCNA is monoubiquitylated on its conserved Lys‐164. This event is considered to facilitate the TLS process in vivo since polη preferentially interacts with monoubiquitylated PCNA through its ubiquitin‐binding domain (UBZ) as well as its PCNA interacting peptide (PIP)‐box. However, recent observations questioned this model. Therefore, in this study, we re‐examined the relative contribution of the regulatory UBZ and PIP domains of polη in response to UVC. We show that simultaneous invalidation of both motifs confers sensitivity to UVC, sensitization by low concentrations of caffeine, prolonged inhibition of DNA synthesis and persistent S phase checkpoint activation, all characteristic features of XPV cells. While each domain is essential for efficient accumulation of polη in replication factories, mutational inactivation of UBZ or PIP motif only confers a slight sensitivity to UVC indicating that, although informative, polη focus analysis is not a reliable tool to assess the polη's ability to function in TLS in vivo. Taken together, these data indicate that PIP and UBZ motifs are not required for recruitment but for retention of polη at sites of stalled replication forks. We propose that this is a way to ensure that a sufficient amount of the protein is available for its bypass function. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  V. Gottifredi,et al.  Kinase-independent function of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in the replication of damaged DNA , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  N. de Wind,et al.  PCNA ubiquitination-independent activation of polymerase η during somatic hypermutation and DNA damage tolerance. , 2011, DNA repair.

[4]  Z. Livneh,et al.  PCNA Ubiquitination Is Important, But Not Essential for Translesion DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[5]  Alexander A. Ishchenko,et al.  The hMsh2-hMsh6 complex acts in concert with monoubiquitinated PCNA and Pol η in response to oxidative DNA damage in human cells. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[6]  D. Carroll Genome Engineering With Zinc-Finger Nucleases , 2011, Genetics.

[7]  Kyle A. Barlow,et al.  A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  A. Lehmann,et al.  ATR-mediated phosphorylation of DNA polymerase η is needed for efficient recovery from UV damage , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  S. D’Souza,et al.  The unusual UBZ domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae polymerase η. , 2010, DNA repair.

[10]  J. Wagner,et al.  Role of the ubiquitin-binding domain of Polη in Rad18-independent translesion DNA synthesis in human cell extracts , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  J. Hurwitz,et al.  DNA polymerase η lacking the ubiquitin-binding domain promotes replicative lesion bypass in humans cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  F. Daboussi,et al.  ATR/Chk1 pathway is essential for resumption of DNA synthesis and cell survival in UV-irradiated XP variant cells. , 2010, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  M. Méchali,et al.  Programming DNA replication origins and chromosome organization , 2010, Chromosome Research.

[14]  L. Prakash,et al.  Highly error-free role of DNA polymerase η in the replicative bypass of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mouse and human cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  S. Nakajima,et al.  DNA polymerase ζ cooperates with polymerases κ and ι in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Toshiyuki Shimizu,et al.  Structural Basis for Novel Interactions between Human Translesion Synthesis Polymerases and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Ubiquitin-binding motif of human DNA polymerase η is required for correct localization , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  K. Cimprich,et al.  DNA damage tolerance: when it's OK to make mistakes. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[19]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Roles of PCNA-binding and ubiquitin-binding domains in human DNA polymerase η in translesion DNA synthesis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Andreu Alibés,et al.  Molecular basis of xeroderma pigmentosum group C DNA recognition by engineered meganucleases , 2008, Nature.

[21]  A. Yasui,et al.  Regulation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen ubiquitination in mammalian cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  O. Podhajcer,et al.  p21 differentially regulates DNA replication and DNA-repair-associated processes after UV irradiation , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[23]  J. Weill,et al.  Role of DNA polymerases eta, iota and zeta in UV resistance and UV-induced mutagenesis in a human cell line. , 2008, DNA repair.

[24]  D. Cortez,et al.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  L. Prakash,et al.  Mutations in the Ubiquitin Binding UBZ Motif of DNA Polymerase η Do Not Impair Its Function in Translesion Synthesis during Replication , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  P. V. D. van den Berk,et al.  A/T mutagenesis in hypermutated immunoglobulin genes strongly depends on PCNAK164 modification , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  Xiaohua Wu,et al.  The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 Complex Acts Both Upstream and Downstream of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated and Rad3-related Protein (ATR) to Regulate the S-phase Checkpoint following UV Treatment* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  S. Jentsch,et al.  PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork , 2007, Cell.

[29]  S. Li,et al.  Structure of the ubiquitin‐binding zinc finger domain of human DNA Y‐polymerase η , 2007, EMBO reports.

[30]  J. Parker,et al.  Contributions of ubiquitin- and PCNA-binding domains to the activity of Polymerase η in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  E. Fanning,et al.  RPA2 Is a Direct Downstream Target for ATR to Regulate the S-phase Checkpoint* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases ι and η via interactions with ubiquitin , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[33]  J. Ford,et al.  Opposing effects of the UV lesion repair protein XPA and UV bypass polymerase η on ATR checkpoint signaling , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[34]  G. Oakley,et al.  UV-induced RPA phosphorylation is increased in the absence of DNA polymerase eta and requires DNA-PK. , 2006, DNA repair.

[35]  G. Wider,et al.  Ubiquitin-Binding Domains in Y-Family Polymerases Regulate Translesion Synthesis , 2005, Science.

[36]  T. Ørntoft,et al.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis , 2005, Nature.

[37]  Dimitris Kletsas,et al.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions , 2005, Nature.

[38]  Michio Kawasuji,et al.  Rad18 guides polη to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[39]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[40]  A. Stary,et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variant and error-prone DNA polymerases. , 2003, Biochimie.

[41]  A. Sarasin,et al.  Role of DNA Polymerase η in the UV Mutation Spectrum in Human Cells* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  N. Walworth,et al.  Phosphorylation activates Chk1 and is required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest , 2002, Journal of Cell Science.

[43]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[44]  W. Kaufmann,et al.  DNA damage responses protect xeroderma pigmentosum variant from UVC-induced clastogenesis. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[45]  W. Kaufmann,et al.  Enhanced S phase delay and inhibition of replication of an undamaged shuttle vector in UVC-irradiated xeroderma pigmentosum variant. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.

[46]  L. Mullenders,et al.  Domain structure, localization, and function of DNA polymerase eta, defective in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells. , 2001, Genes & development.

[47]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Mechanisms of accurate translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase η , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[48]  J. Cleaver,et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells are resistant to immortalization. , 1995, Mutation research.

[49]  J. Mccormick,et al.  Frequency of ultraviolet light-induced mutations is higher in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells than in normal human cells , 1976, Nature.

[50]  C. Arlett,et al.  The influence of caffeine on cell survival in excision-proficient and excision-deficient xeroderma pigmentosum and normal human cell strains following ultraviolet-light irradiation. , 1975, Mutation research.

[51]  C. Reynaud,et al.  Pcna uBiquitination-indePendent activation oF PolyMeraSe eta durinG , 2013 .

[52]  C. Vaziri,et al.  Separate roles of structured and unstructured regions of Y-family DNA polymerases. , 2009, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[53]  N Sunter,et al.  DNA damage responses. , 2008 .

[54]  M. Paterson,et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum cells with normal levels of excision repair have a defect in DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  M. Mann,et al.  Regulation of Translesion Synthesis Dna Polymerase by Η Monoubiquitination Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Molecular Cell Manuscript Draft Title: Regulation of Translesion Synthesis Dna Polymerase Η by Monoubiquitination Molecular Signaling Cancer Cell Signaling M. Innocenti, Phd Regulation of Tra , 2022 .